· Private foundation
Tr Edna Wardlaw Charitable Tr Ua Magnolia Trust Company Trustee
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k40 grants · $189k
- $10k–50k67 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC | $80,000 |
| BARNABAS HORSE FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| SODA MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS COUNCIL | $60,000 |
| EARTHJUSTICE | $40,000 |
| ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL | $40,000 |
| PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC | $40,000 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION | $40,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $40,000 |
| MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE | $39,000 |
| A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE INC | $39,000 |
| GLOBAL RESISTANCE | $36,500 |
| SF CARES | $30,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $25,000 |
| FOUR HORSESHOES YOUTH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC | $23,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
154 repeat relationships — 87 still active in FY2025, 67 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBarnabas Horse Foundation Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $355k · revenue +15%
- ASAtlanta Speech School Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $315k · revenue +37%
- NDNEW DIRECTIONS OF HORRY COUNTY INC6× · 2020–2025 · $192k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- HBHEALING BRIDGE COUNSELING CENTERone grant, 2020 · $55k
- FPFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH - MRYTLE BEACHone grant, 2024 · $50k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families for Justice As Healing Inc and the most unlike its peers is Florida Humane Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
150 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 150 of the 218 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Barnabas Horse Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Speech School Inc ↗
- Who funds FOUR HORSESHOES YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS OF HORRY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SODA MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT ↗
- Who funds WILD HOPE INC SIERRA TREKS/LITTLEFOOT EXPEDITIONS ↗
- Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds GEOS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds Upstream Policy Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THOUSAND CURRENTS ↗
- Who funds KIND INC ↗
- Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
- Who funds HEALING BRIDGES ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL EXCHANGE ↗
- Who funds WACCAMAW YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Fernbank Inc ↗
- Who funds SUNNY WOLF CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Make Your Mark Media Inc ↗
- Who funds PEACE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Redwood Justice Fund ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HORRY COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Patagoniaorg · Ryan Ida Alice Tuw Main · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · AEC Trust · The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Georgia Power Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tr Edna Wardlaw Charitable Tr Ua Magnolia Trust Company Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Works Inc — 59% of income from government
- The Diaper Bank of Connecticut Inc — 49% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Sunny Wolf Charter School — 26% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- The Sundari Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- Hope Equestrian Center — 3% of income from government
- Infact Dba Corporate Accountability — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.