· Public charity
Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911
PACC911 (Phoenix Animal Care Coalition) unites and supports pet rescue organizations throughout Arizona by fostering collaboration and providing critical resources that strengthen lifesaving efforts.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 35 grants below total $405,923 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $552,818 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $146,895 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $107k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $298k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEST VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE | $28,341 |
| ALONE NO MORE DOG RESCUE | $22,653 |
| LOVE THEM ALL | $22,600 |
| SECOND-2ND CHANCE DOG RESCUE | $19,350 |
| CHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTU | $19,150 |
| HANNAH PEARL RESCUE | $17,430 |
| DAWGZ TAILZ & WAGZ | $16,350 |
| SAVING PAWS RESCURE AZ | $15,514 |
| ARIZONA POODLE RESCUE | $14,740 |
| HOME FUR GOOD ANIMAL RESCUE & | $14,521 |
| ROTTEN ROTTIE RESCUE | $13,950 |
| Individual grant recipient | $13,670 |
| PAWS 4 LIFE AZ | $13,080 |
| SAVING ONE LIFE | $11,840 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,810 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPSAVING PAWS RESCUE AZ7× · 2019–2025 · $177k · revenue +153%
- CTCHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARY6× · 2019–2024 · $100k · revenue +292%
- APARIZONA POODLE RESCUE INC5× · 2019–2025 · $86k · revenue +510%
Funded once
- AAARIZONA ANIMAL RESCUE MISSIONone grant, 2018 · $32k
- ANAlone No More Dogsone grant, 2024 · $23k
- ABAnimal Benefit Clubone grant, 2024 · $17k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Animal rescue
foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs
Rescue dogs, which includes housing, vetting, and transport.
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
Saving dogs
Dog rescue
Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,
We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Happy Tails Dachshund Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Saint Francis Feline Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAVING PAWS RESCUE AZ ↗
- Who funds LOVE THEM ALL ↗
- Who funds CHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds BOXER LUV RESCUE ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA POODLE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds ROTTEN ROTTIE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Sky Sanctuary Rescue ↗
- Who funds ALONE NO MORE DOG RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS 4 A CAUSE ↗
- Who funds Better Days Inc ↗
- Who funds HELP A DOG SMILE ↗
- Who funds Animals Benefit Club of Arizona Inc ↗
- Who funds Dawgz Tailz and Wagz Llc ↗
- Who funds HOME FUR GOOD ANIMAL RESCUE AND PLACEMENT ↗
- Who funds Hannahpearl Rescue ↗
- Who funds Living the Dream Rescue ↗
- Who funds HAPPY TAILS DACHSHUND RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds REGAL DANE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Love Connection Dog Rescue ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Two Pups Wellness Fund · Cause4paws Pet Food Bank · Timothy T Day Foundation Inc · Arizona Community Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Pedigree Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Healthy Paws Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911?
Find your warmest path to Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.