Skip to content
Timothy T Day Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Timothy T Day Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
66
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$9.4MHuman Services$9.4MAnimals$6.0MReligion$1.8MArts & Culture$1.7MHealth$1.3MPhilanthropy$273kInternational$265kOther$0
02FY2024 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $557k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+9 grants · $3.8M
$23,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$49M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TUN LEGACY FOUNDATION INC$1,000,000
KINGDOM X$600,000
ANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK$490,243
HBS ADVANCED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM$368,000
MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION$350,000
SEMPER FI FUND$250,000
THE TRINITY CHURCH$250,000
HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT$250,000
MAYO CLINIC$250,000
MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$150,000
DOG IS MY COPILOT$110,000
FLYING LEATHERNECK HISTORICAL FOUNDATION$100,000
MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$100,000
PAWS OF JACKSON HOLE$100,000
MARINE CORPS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $7.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1.3M → 7%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 7%NAGI FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 7%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 7%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $872k → 7%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $543k → 7%NAGI FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $350k → 7%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $310k → 7%VALLEY OF THE SUN YMCA: $5k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $6k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
NY
MA
NV
WY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29M · 75 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

75 repeat relationships: 58 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
31

Total granted

$29M
$350k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+17%

Still filing today

67%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.0M · revenue +7%
  • SF
    SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +56%
  • AG
    ANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +6% · 77% of their budget

Funded once

  • TC
    THUNDERBIRDS CHARITIES
    one grant, 2020 · $85k · revenue +9%
  • SF
    SEEK FIRST MINISTRY
    one grant, 2018 · $60k
  • SF
    SEEK FIRST MINISTRY KINGDOM X
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Animal Rescue

Rescue, rehabilitation and "re-homing" of unwanted and abandoned dogs.

Animals
2
Arizona Small Dog Rescue

To rescue and save homeless, unwanted, abandoned, neglected, and abused dogs

Animals
3
Desert Dog Rescue Inc

Animal rescue

Animals
4
Freedom Brothers Recovery and Rescue

Freedom Brothers Rescue and Recovery is a non-profit, no-kill, volunteer animal rescue and recovery organization serving the Phoenix Arizona area.

Animals
5
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
6
Raskels Rescue
Animals
7
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
8
Foothill Dog Rescue of the Sierras

Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…

Animals
9
Mountain View Animal Rescue

Rescue of abused or abandoned animals

Animals
10
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
11
Amazing Dogs

Our mission is to save dogs in distressing conditions on both sides of the California/Mexican border. We provide them with essential medical treatment and care to help them regain their health, and ultimately match them with loving homes…

Animals
12
Alliance for Arizona Animal Protection

Prevention of animal cruelty and intervention on behalf of animals being abused.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Bad Rap. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/69
Grantees still filing
56/69
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $4,392,436 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOLHBS ADVANCED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM: $2,167,704 · OtherHBS ADVANCED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMAYO CLINIC: $1,055,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICPACC911: $616,000 · OtherPACC911HBS MARINE CORPS ENTREPRENEUR FELLOWSHIP: $550,498 · OtherTRINITY CHURCH: $510,000 · Other+54 more: $2,213,753 · Other+54 moreMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6,988,610 · Human ServicesMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUN…+4 more: $65,500 · Human ServicesANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK INC: $1,365,293 · AnimalsANIMAL GUARDIAN …Animal Adoption Center Inc: $453,500 · AnimalsAnimal Adoption …PAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES: $332,500 · AnimalsPAWS - PROVIDING…DOG IS MY COPILOT: $284,500 · AnimalsDOG IS MY COPILO…AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $276,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE …THE ARIZONA PET PROJECT: $270,000 · AnimalsTHE ARIZONA PET …Lost Our Home Pet Foundation: $183,450 · Animals+24 more: $1,310,000 · Animals+24 moreSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $2,233,000 · HealthBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $120,000 · Health+1 more: $42,000 · HealthMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $950,000 · EducationMARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $805,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $145,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $80,000 · Education+3 more: $85,000 · EducationTHE TUN LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureMARINE CORPS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $500,000 · Arts & CultureFLYING LEATHERNECK HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $35,000 · Arts & CultureKINGDOM X INC: $910,000 · Religion+1 more: $15,000 · Religion
Other$11,505,391Human Services$7,054,110Animals$4,475,243Health$2,395,000Education$2,365,000Arts & Culture$1,735,000Religion$925,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6,988,610 over 8y, 13% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $2,233,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK INC: $1,365,293 over 8y, 77% of budgetTHE TUN LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $950,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetKINGDOM X INC: $910,000 over 5y, 44% of budgetMARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $805,000 over 8y, 24% of budgetMARINE CORPS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetAnimal Adoption Center Inc: $453,500 over 8y, 9.5% of budgetPAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES: $332,500 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetDOG IS MY COPILOT: $284,500 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $276,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ARIZONA PET PROJECT: $270,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetHEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC: $250,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFLYING LEATHERNECK HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetLost Our Home Pet Foundation: $183,450 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $145,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNational Mill Dog Rescue: $131,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSky Sanctuary Rescue: $127,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Aska's Animals Foundation Inc: $115,000 over 4y, 16% of budget2ND CHANCE DOG RESCUE: $109,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetPINTLER PETS: $103,800 over 8y, 11% of budgetPUG RESCUE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $97,000 over 8y, 26% of budgetPUG NATION RESCUE OF LOS ANGELES: $89,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetTHUNDERBIRDS CHARITIES: $85,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLuv of dogz fund: $81,700 over 8y, 59% of budgetTHE INNER PUP: $80,500 over 8y, 10% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOGS INC: $74,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetLittle Red Dog Inc: $72,500 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOVEPUP FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $67,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOCHISE CANINE RESCUE: $59,850 over 7y, 19% of budgetWYOMING PUG RESCUE: $53,500 over 5y, 11% of budgetBARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $50,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $42,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTREET PAWS INC: $41,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $40,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLilys Legacy Senior Dog Sanctuary: $38,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetNagi Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetTalons Reach Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetRUSTY S ANGELS SANCTUARY: $26,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $25,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP PENDLETON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 24% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL GUARDIAN NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TUN LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM X INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Animal Adoption Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOG IS MY COPILOT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ARIZONA PET PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FLYING LEATHERNECK HISTORICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Lost Our Home Pet Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds National Mill Dog Rescue ↗
  • Who funds Sky Sanctuary Rescue ↗
  • Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Aska's Animals Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds 2ND CHANCE DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds PINTLER PETS ↗
  • Who funds PUG RESCUE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PUG NATION RESCUE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds THUNDERBIRDS CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds Luv of dogz fund ↗
  • Who funds THE INNER PUP ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Phoenix Animal Care C…American Express Foun…Community Foundation …Arizona Community Fou…The Yelp FoundationBest Friends Animal S…Petsmart Charities IncGreater Good CharitiesThe Brooks FoundationPedigree FoundationPetco LoveThe Duffield Family F…
Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911AZ19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911 · American Express Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Arizona Community Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society · Petsmart Charities Inc · Greater Good Charities · The Brooks Foundation · Pedigree Foundation · Petco Love · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Timothy T Day Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Timothy T Day Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Southwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Timothy T Day Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Timothy T Day Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 114 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Timothy T Day’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home