Skip to content
Tikun Olam Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Tikun Olam Foundation

The TIKUN OLAM FOUNDATION seeks to help vulnerable children by providing support to the child, the family, and the community.

$27M
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$17MHealth$9.9MEducation$2.0MPhilanthropy$1.7MArts & Culture$810kCommunity Improvement$510kCivil Rights$50kCrime & Legal$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 24 grants below total $6,104,333, the rows itemized in this filing. The $26,501,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,397,167 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+4 grants · $4.4M
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$82M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Zero To Three National Center for Infants$1,334,333
Jewish Family Svc LA$1,080,000
Children's Hospital Los Angeles$1,000,000
Venice Family Clinic$1,000,000
All For Kids Organization$225,000
President & Fellows of Harvard College$150,000
Westside Infant-Family Network$135,000
University of California San Francisco Foundation$125,000
Southern California Public Radio$120,000
Jewish Community Fnd of LA$100,000
Foothill Family Service$100,000
Allies for Every Child Inc$100,000
Los Angeles Education Partnership$100,000
Community Partners Inc$85,000
California Community Foundation$80,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $14.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Child Welfare Innovation dba Foster America: $40k → 16%Partners For Children South LA: $50k → 14%Zero To Three National Center for Infants Toddlers and Families: $1.3M → 14%Anchor House: $15k → 11%Child Welfare Innovation dba FA: $40k → 16%Partners For Children South LA: $30k → 14%Zero To Three National Center for Infants: $1.0M → 14%Children's Home Society of New Jersey: $8k → 11%Zero To Three National Center for Infants: $1.0M → 14%Zero to Three National Center for Infants: $706k → 14%Allies for Every Child Inc: $100k → 14%Zero To Three National Center for Infants: $350k → 14%Allies f Every Child Inc: $93k → 14%Children Now: $50k → 10%Allies f Every Child Inc: $93k → 14%Allies for Every Child Inc: $63k → 14%Westside Children's Center: $60k → 14%Allies for Every Child Inc: $50k → 14%Allies for Every Child Inc: $35k → 14%Foothill Fmly Srvce: $100k → 14%Para los Ninos: $90k → 14%Foothill Family Service: $100k → 14%Para Los Ninos: $63k → 14%Foothill Family Service: $100k → 14%Para Los Ninos: $60k → 14%Foothill Fmly Srvce: $100k → 14%Para Los Ninos: $60k → 14%Foothill Family Service: $50k → 14%Para Los Ninos: $50k → 14%Foothill Family Service: $50k → 14%Para Los Ninos: $45k → 14%Foothill Family Service: $40k → 14%Zero To Three National Center for Infants: $1.0M → 14%Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles: $295k → 14%Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles: $60k → 14%Children's Bureau of Southern California: $767k → 14%Children's Bureau of Southern California: $400k → 14%Children's Bureau of Southern California: $383k → 14%Children's Bureau of S CA: $375k → 14%Children's Bureau of Southern California: $350k → 14%Children's Bureau of S CA: $225k → 14%Jewish Family Svc LA: $1.1M → 14%Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles: $1.1M → 14%Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles: $785k → 14%Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles: $780k → 14%Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles: $534k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 21 repeat orgs$644k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
8

Total granted

$28M
$639k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+1%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZT
    ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $6.7M · revenue +4%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5.6M · revenue +78%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $4.6M · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • VF
    VENICE FAMILY CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $441k · revenue -21%
  • CHILDREN NOW
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +1%
  • BT
    BET TZEDEKgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +123%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
2
Catalyst Family Inc

At catalyst family, inc., we believe that strong families build strong communities. we are committed to nurturing vibrant communities where children thrive and families succeed, creating lasting change.

Education
3
Pediatric and Family Medical Center Dba Eisner Health

Eisner health is a quality-focused, federally qualified nonprofit community health center dedicated to improving the physical, social, and emotional well-being of people in the communities we serve, regardless of income.

Health
4
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
5
Children's Home Society of California

The mission of children's home society of california is to provide children, families, and communities with supportive services to thrive.

Human Services
6
Children's Hospital Los Angeles Medical Group

To be the preeminent pediatric, multispecialty medical group in the nation, dedicated to providing the highest quality medical care to infants, children and adolescents; and supporting the finest teaching and research endeavors of our…

—
7
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
8
Planned Parenthood Los Angeles

To provide convenient and affordable access to a comprehensive range of quality reproductive health care and sexual health information through patient services, education, and advocacy.

Health
9
Options for Learning

Options for learning is a leader in preparing children and supporting families for life success through innovative, quality child development programs.vision: unlocking the promise of every child.

—
10
El Nido Family Centers

Empower families in low-income communities of los angeles county to break the cycle of poverty, child abuse, violence, academic failure, and teen pregnancy through outstanding educational, youth development, health and therapeutic services.

—
11
Kidworks Community Development Corp

Kidworks inspires purpose in youth, fuels their growth, and catalyzes their impact in the community and the world.

Human Services
12
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners; the most unlike its peers is Corner House Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
31/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $6,724,066 · Human ServicesZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FA…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $4,593,863 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELESALL FOR KIDS ORGANIZATION: $2,725,000 · Human ServicesALL FOR KIDS ORGANIZATIONFoothill Family Service: $540,000 · Human Services+8 more: $1,363,000 · Human Services+8 moreChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $5,600,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $3,333,500 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK: $804,000 · HealthWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK+1 more: $29,000 · HealthPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $880,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $400,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $392,300 · EducationFAMILIES FORWARD LEARNING CENTER: $370,000 · EducationTHE MOSAIC PROJECT: $138,500 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $931,773 · PhilanthropyVENICE FAMILY CLINIC FOUNDATION: $441,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $410,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $82,250 · Philanthropy+3 more: $120,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $785,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $510,000 · Community ImprovementLOS ANGELES EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $200,000 · OtherMAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER: $80,000 · OtherCORNER HOUSE FOUNDATION: $42,000 · OtherBET TZEDEK: $35,000 · OtherINTERFAITHFAMILYCOM INC: $30,000 · OtherJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · Other
Human Services$15,945,929Health$9,766,500Education$2,180,800Philanthropy$1,985,023Arts & Culture$810,000Community Improvement$510,000Other$412,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $6,724,066 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $5,600,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $4,593,863 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $3,333,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetALL FOR KIDS ORGANIZATION: $2,725,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $931,773 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $880,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK: $804,000 over 7y, 8.9% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $785,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFoothill Family Service: $540,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $510,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAllies for Every Child Inc: $492,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC FOUNDATION: $441,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $432,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $410,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $392,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD LEARNING CENTER: $370,000 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $200,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MOSAIC PROJECT: $138,500 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $135,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR CHILDREN SOUTH LA: $130,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $82,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER: $80,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetChild Welfare Innovation Inc: $80,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN NOW: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCORNER HOUSE FOUNDATION: $42,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetANCHOR HOUSE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBET TZEDEK: $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERFAITHFAMILYCOM INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $29,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSHAREWELL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Jewish Community Foun…Baby2babyThe Ralph M Parsons F…The Deutsch FoundationWeingart FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The Rose Hills Founda…The Ahmanson Foundati…The Annenberg Foundat…The Robert Wood Johns…
California Community FoundationCA22.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Baby2baby · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Deutsch Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tikun Olam Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tikun Olam Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 43%
  • Anchor House Inc: 45% of income from government
  • The Childrens Home Society of New Jersey: 43% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tikun Olam’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home