· Private foundation
Threshold of Hope Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k34 grants · $182k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI | $10,000 |
| CONVOY OF HOPE | $10,000 |
| THE GATHERING TREE | $10,000 |
| WELCOME HOME - HOMELESS VETERANS | $10,000 |
| SAMARITAN CENTER | $10,000 |
| BOSTON RESCUE MISSION | $10,000 |
| OZARK FOOD HARVEST | $9,000 |
| ST FRANCIS HOUSE | $8,000 |
| NOURISHING HOPE - SHERIDAN MARKET | $7,000 |
| PAUL'S PANTRY | $7,000 |
| PACIFIC GARDEN MISSION | $7,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA | $7,000 |
| THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK | $7,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES | $7,000 |
| AID FOR STARVING CHILDREN | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $526k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
55 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC9× · 2017–2025 · $132k · revenue +71%
- OFOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC9× · 2017–2025 · $109k · revenue +69%
- BRBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- MLMOROCCAN LEAGUE FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDRENone grant, 2024 · $25k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $15k
- NHNOURSHING HOPE - SHERIDAN MARKETone grant, 2024 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.
Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
To feed the hungry by soliciting and receiving food and other goods from local, regional and national food companies and other enterprises
With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…
The mission of god's pantry food bank is reducing hunger by working together to feed kentucky communities. god's pantry food bank envisions a nourished life for every kentuckian.
We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.
To provide comprehensive support services for individuals and families that are in need of everyday necessities due to insufficient financial resources or family instabilty. c.a.r.e.s. will offer food, clothing, job education and training…
Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland and the most unlike its peers is The Caring People. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING TREE ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
- Who funds WELCOME HOME INC ↗
- Who funds AID FOR STARVING CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds LEAST OF THESE INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · Roy W Slusher Charitable Foundation · Musgrave Foundation · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc · Forvis Mazars Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Threshold of Hope Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
- Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.