Skip to content

· Private foundation

Threshold of Hope Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$242k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MFood & Nutrition$902kHousing & Shelter$477kInternational$107kReligion$66kHealth$28kCommunity Improvement$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $182k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
$7,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN CENTER$10,000
WELCOME HOME - HOMELESS VETERANS$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI$10,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$10,000
THE GATHERING TREE$10,000
BOSTON RESCUE MISSION$10,000
OZARK FOOD HARVEST$9,000
ST FRANCIS HOUSE$8,000
SALVATION ARMY - GREEN BAY$7,000
SALVATION ARMY - KIRKSVILLE$7,000
THE KITCHEN$7,000
EAST SUNSHINE CHURCH OF CHRIST - COLD WEATHER MENS SHELTER$7,000
PAUL'S PANTRY$7,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$7,000
PACIFIC GARDEN MISSION$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $526k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%LEAST OF THESE INC: $7k → 8%THE SAMARITAN CENTER: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $10k → 6%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%CARE TO LEARN: $5k → 8%THE SAMARITAN CENTER: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $10k → 6%CARE TO LEARN: $5k → 8%THE SAMARITAN CENTER: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $5k → 6%LEAST OF THESE INC: $5k → 8%THE KITCHEN: $10k → 15%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $5k → 6%LEAST OF THESE INC: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $5k → 6%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $5k → 6%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $15k → 16%COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $5k → 6%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $15k → 16%THE KITCHEN: $10k → 15%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $12k → 16%THE KITCHEN: $7k → 15%THE GATHERING TREE: $15k → 15%THE GATHERING TREE: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISS: $22k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISS: $18k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEASTERN MISSOURI - LIFE CRISIS MATERNITY HOME: $15k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISS: $15k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISS: $15k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISS: $15k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISS: $13k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISS: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI: $10k → 15%THE KITCHEN: $15k → 15%THE KITCHEN: $10k → 15%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOMES & SERVICES: $10k → 15%THE KITCHEN: $10k → 15%THE KITCHEN: $10k → 15%THE KITCHEN: $10k → 15%THE KITCHEN: $10k → 15%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $7k → 15%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 15%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 15%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 15%THE GATHERING TREE: $15k → 15%THE GATHERING TREE: $15k → 15%THE GATHERING TREE: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
NE
MO
MD
AZ
NC
SC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 55 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
22

Total granted

$2.5M
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+8%

Still filing today

53%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalHousing & ShelterHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $132k · revenue +71%
  • OF
    OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $109k · revenue +69%
  • BR
    BOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • ML
    MOROCCAN LEAGUE FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • NH
    NOURSHING HOPE - SHERIDAN MARKET
    one grant, 2024 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
4
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
7
Kansas Foodbank Warehouse Inc

To feed the hungry by soliciting and receiving food and other goods from local, regional and national food companies and other enterprises

Food & Nutrition
8
Northern Illinois Food Bank

With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…

Food & Nutrition
9
God's Pantry Food Bank Inc

The mission of god's pantry food bank is reducing hunger by working together to feed kentucky communities. god's pantry food bank envisions a nourished life for every kentuckian.

—
10
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition
11
Cares of Farmington Hills Inc

To provide comprehensive support services for individuals and families that are in need of everyday necessities due to insufficient financial resources or family instabilty. c.a.r.e.s. will offer food, clothing, job education and training…

Food & Nutrition
12
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is The Caring People. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/40
Grantees still filing
30/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $110,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYPACIFIC GARDEN MISSION: $107,000 · OtherPACIFIC GARDEN MISSIONSALVATION ARMY: $90,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMERCY HOME: $75,500 · OtherMERCY HOMENOURISHING HOPE: $71,000 · OtherWELCOME HOME INC: $67,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $57,000 · OtherCOUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF THE OZARKS INC: $56,000 · OtherVICTORY MISSION: $53,000 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SER: $50,000 · Other+38 more: $665,500 · Other+38 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC: $132,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SO…THE KITCHEN INC: $92,000 · Human ServicesTHE KITCHEN INCTHE SAMARITAN CENTER INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesTHE SAMARITAN CENTER INCTHE GATHERING TREE: $79,000 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING TREESAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $74,000 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INCCOMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $48,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSETLEAST OF THESE INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $21,000 · Human Services+4 more: $43,000 · Human Services+4 moreOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $109,000 · Food & NutritionOZARKS FOOD HAR…HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $107,000 · Food & NutritionHARVEST HOPE FO…PAUL'S PANTRY INC: $52,000 · Food & NutritionPAUL'S PANTRY I…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $46,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO…Community Food Bank Inc: $17,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $17,000 · Food & NutritionFoxboro Discretionary FundInc: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $20,000 · Food & NutritionCONVOY OF HOPE: $131,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF …AID FOR STARVING CHILDREN: $57,000 · InternationalAID FOR ST…FEED THE CHILDREN INC: $33,000 · InternationalFEED THE C…ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $25,000 · InternationalACTION AGA…BOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC: $85,000 · Housing & ShelterFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $39,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC: $13,000 · Community ImprovementRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC: $5,000 · HealthFirecracker Foundation: $3,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,402,000Human Services$598,000Food & Nutrition$383,000International$246,000Housing & Shelter$124,000Community Improvement$13,000Health$8,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC: $132,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $131,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $109,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $107,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KITCHEN INC: $92,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC: $85,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SAMARITAN CENTER INC: $85,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetTHE GATHERING TREE: $79,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $74,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $71,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWELCOME HOME INC: $67,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAID FOR STARVING CHILDREN: $57,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $57,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $52,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET: $48,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $46,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $39,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $33,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $32,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLEAST OF THESE INC: $24,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $21,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoxboro Discretionary FundInc: $15,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCare to Learn: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetELEVATE BRANSON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANTRY FOR ADAIR COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFirecracker Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIAPER BANK OF THE OZARKS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CARING PEOPLE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING TREE ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds WELCOME HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds AID FOR STARVING CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
  • Who funds LEAST OF THESE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO28.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · Roy W Slusher Charitable Foundation · Musgrave Foundation · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc · Forvis Mazars Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Threshold of Hope Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Threshold of Hope Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Saint Francis House Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Threshold of Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph