· Private foundation
Thomas Nelson Abdella MD Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k22 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k45 grants · $945k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $640k
- $250k+1 grant · $253k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Olive Crest | $252,500 |
| UNLV Foundation | $134,500 |
| Macon Area Habitat Humanity | $100,000 |
| Volunteers in Medicine | $100,000 |
| Macon Volunteer Clinic | $100,000 |
| Nevada Hand | $55,000 |
| A New Leaf | $50,000 |
| Mercer University - School of Engin | $50,000 |
| 493 Firefighter Foundation | $50,000 |
| St Jude Children's Research Hospita | $40,000 |
| St Vincent DePaul | $40,000 |
| St Mary's Food Bank | $40,000 |
| UMOM New Day Centers | $30,000 |
| Mission228 | $30,000 |
| Atlanta Community Food Bank | $25,215 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $437k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MVMACON VOLUNTEER CLINIC INC2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +39%
- UNUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $80k · revenue +9%
- ANA NEW LEAF2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Nevada Las Vegasone grant, 2023 · $204k
- HFHabitat for Humanity Incone grant, 2023 · $85k
- VIVolunteers in Medicine of Southernone grant, 2023 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.
The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…
The shade tree, inc. (organization), a nevada nonprofit corporation, provides temporary shelter for homeless and abused women and children in crisis and offers life-changing services promoting stability, dignity, and self reliance. the…
Habitat for humanity las vegas, inc. (habitat) a not-for-profit organization located in las vegas, nevada was established in 1990. habitat's purpose is to build low cost houses with the help of the homeowner families, which are transferred…
Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.
Provide christ-centered, life-transforming solutions to persons facing hunger, homelessness, addiction, and trauma. the phoenix rescue mission is a place of hope, healing, and new beginnings for men, women, and children in our community.
New vista is committed to providing people of all ages with intellectual and developmental disabilities, equitable opportunities, and supported living arrangements so that they may experience life to the fullest.
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
Save the family equips families to address poverty, overcome homelessness and acheive self-sufficiency.
Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…
Our mission is to reach in and mine the incredible potential we believe lies within the lives of at-risk youth, the homeless, and needy families of our community by restoring hope and allowing them to dream again.
Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Women's Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project 34. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 9. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 33% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds MACON VOLUNTEER CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VMSN INC ↗
- Who funds MACON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEAF ↗
- Who funds CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE GEORGIA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Mission228 Inc ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RYAN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOPE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds 100 CLUB OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds ABILITY360 INC ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds ANGELS ON PATROL INC ↗
- Who funds Southeast Gwinnett Cooperative Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds SOLDIERS BEST FRIEND ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING MACON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wynn Resorts Foundation · United Way of Southern Nevada · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Mondays Dark · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · Engelstad Family Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Raiders Foundation Nv · Speedway Children's Charities · BHHS Legacy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Thomas Nelson Abdella MD Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.