Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas Marshall Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$415k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$987kArts & Culture$699kEducation$625kHuman Services$289kPhilanthropy$158kEnvironment$118kReligion$80kHousing & Shelter$74kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOUNDLESS$100,000
Individual grant recipient$32,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$30,000
THE LINDSAY THEATER & CULTURAL CENTER$20,000
THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY$20,000
SWEETWATER CENTER FOR THE ARTS$20,000
NATIONAL FLAG FOUNDATION$20,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PA$15,000
FERN HALLOW NATURE CENTER$10,000
SEWICKLEY VALLEY YMCA$10,000
CANCER BRIDGES$10,000
WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$10,000
UNION AID SOCIETY$10,000
CRISIS CENTER NORTH$10,000
ANGEL'S PLACE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $247k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%CRISIS CENTER NORTH: $10k → 11%CRISIS CENTER NORTH: $10k → 11%CRISIS CENTER NORTH: $5k → 11%CRISIS CENTER NORTH: $5k → 11%CRISIS CENTER NORTH: $5k → 11%CRISIS CENTER NORTH: $5k → 11%CRISIS CENTER NORTH: $5k → 11%CRISIS CENTER NORTH: $5k → 11%CRISIS CENTER NORTH: $5k → 11%THE BRADLEY CENTER: $5k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%GENESIS OF PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%GENESIS OF PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%GENESIS OF PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $5k → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY: $10k → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY: $5k → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY: $5k → 11%SEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY: $5k → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY: $5k → 11%SEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY: $5k → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY: $5k → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY: $5k → 11%UNION AID SOCIETY: $5k → 11%SEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 11%SEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 11%SEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
MD
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 45 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
6

Total granted

$2.9M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+13%

Still filing today

71%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health
    6× · 2019–2024 · $600k · revenue +82%
  • SA
    SEWICKLEY ACADEMY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +41%
  • TN
    THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $95k · revenue +243%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • UI
    URBAN IMPACT
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • SV
    Sewickley Valley Community Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
Jeremiah's Place Pittsburgh Relief Nursery

Jeremiah's place will protect children and strengthen families by providing a safe haven of respite, health, renewal, and support for children and families during times of crisis. we strive to serve as a leading voice for child abuse…

Human Services
3
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
4
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
5
Center for Victims

Center for victims offers a public service in allegheny county by helping individuals, families, and communities heal from the trauma of sexual assault/abuse, intimate partner violence, community violence, and all forms of violence and…

Human Services
6
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
7
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
8
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
9
Pittsburgh Entertainment Project

To create a vibrant, responsible, and sustainable film and digital media sector in southwestern pennsylvania.

—
10
Mercy Life Center Corporation

We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life center is a member of pittsburgh mercy health system…

Health
11
World Affairs Council of Pittsburgh

The world affairs council of pittsburgh's mission is to convene and connect people around global issues to build a competitive, thriving, and inclusive pittsburgh.

International
12
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pittsburgh Kids Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is JUST1MIKE. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEarly Childhood Care and Ed…Charitable Trusts and Found…Community Support Organizat…Hospital Systems and Clinic…Professional Trade Associat…Healthcare Services & Advoc…Parks & Land ConservationTheater & Performance ArtsRegional Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%0%<5yr12%5%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr20%29%20–35yr16%32%35–55yr17%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%0%<5yr12%2%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr20%32%20–35yr16%21%35–55yr17%35%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/43
the rest of the field
8%
843/10,845

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
33/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOUNDLESS — $200,000 · OtherBOUNDLESSCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH — $200,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGHAngels Place Inc — $90,000 · OtherAngels Place IncSEWICKLEY VALLEY YMCA — $57,300 · OtherHEARTH — $48,000 · OtherSAMARITAN CENTER — $42,000 · OtherLEADING HEARTS-THE HEART FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherCASA of Allegheny County — $45,000 · OtherPITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · Other+22 more — $422,150 · Other+22 moreDartmouth-Hitchcock Health — $600,000 · HealthDartmouth-Hitchcock He…CANCER BRIDGES — $44,700 · HealthCANCER BRIDGESMARY & ALEXANDER LAUGHLIN CHILDREN'S CENTER — $26,700 · Health+2 more — $12,000 · HealthNATIONAL FLAG FOUNDATION — $445,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL FLAG FOUNDA…VILLAGE THEATER COMPANY — $80,000 · Arts & CultureVILLAGE THEATER COMP…Sweetwater Art Center — $35,000 · Arts & CultureSweetwater Art Cente…CARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $24,000 · Arts & CultureVETERANS BREAKFAST CLUB — $21,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $14,750 · Arts & CultureTrustees of Dartmouth College — $300,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartm…SEWICKLEY ACADEMY — $100,000 · EducationSEWICKLEY ACADEMYTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $95,000 · EducationTHE NEIGHBORHOOD …JUST1MIKE — $27,000 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationCRISIS CENTER NORTH INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $50,000 · Human ServicesUnion Aid Society — $50,000 · Human ServicesBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH — $45,000 · Human ServicesSEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER — $17,000 · Human ServicesGENESIS OF PITTSBURGH INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $150,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyFERN HOLLOW NATURE CENTER INC — $40,000 · EnvironmentTHE VERMONT CENTER FOR ECOSTUDIES INC — $30,000 · Environment
Other$1,184,450Health$683,400Arts & Culture$619,750Education$532,000Human Services$247,000Philanthropy$155,000Environment$70,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Health — $600,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL FLAG FOUNDATION — $445,000 over 9y, 90% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $150,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSEWICKLEY ACADEMY — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $95,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAngels Place Inc — $90,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetVILLAGE THEATER COMPANY — $80,000 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetCRISIS CENTER NORTH INC — $55,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $50,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUnion Aid Society — $50,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetCASA of Allegheny County — $45,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH — $45,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCANCER BRIDGES — $44,700 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetSAMARITAN CENTER — $42,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFERN HOLLOW NATURE CENTER INC — $40,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetPITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSweetwater Art Center — $35,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE VERMONT CENTER FOR ECOSTUDIES INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHosanna Industries Inc — $29,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE — $28,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetJUST1MIKE — $27,000 over 6y, 10.0% of budgetMARY & ALEXANDER LAUGHLIN CHILDREN'S CENTER — $26,700 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY — $26,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS BREAKFAST CLUB — $21,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetGwens Girls Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER — $17,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetGENESIS OF PITTSBURGH INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC — $14,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH FELLOWS — $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERLAND — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL NEW YORK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRADLEY CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FLAG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds SEWICKLEY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Angels Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE THEATER COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER NORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds Union Aid Society ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Allegheny County ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds CANCER BRIDGES ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FERN HOLLOW NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Sweetwater Art Center ↗
  • Who funds THE VERMONT CENTER FOR ECOSTUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Hosanna Industries Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE ↗
  • Who funds JUST1MIKE ↗
  • Who funds MARY & ALEXANDER LAUGHLIN CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS BREAKFAST CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Gwens Girls Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…Clapp G H Decd Char a…Child Health Associat…Richard King Mellon F…The United Way of Sou…Snee-Reinhardt Charit…Hillman Family Founda…The Peirce Family Fou…Aj and Sigismunda Pal…The Grable FoundationWp Snyder III Charita…Massey Charitable Tru…
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA48.5× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Clapp G H Decd Char and Ed Tr · Child Health Association of Sewickley Inc · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Peirce Family Foundation Inc · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust · The Grable Foundation · Wp Snyder III Charitable Fund · Massey Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas Marshall Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • The Vermont Center for Ecostudies Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Thomas Marshall Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Thomas Marshall Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines