Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nature Sacred

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$171k
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$266kEnvironment$182kRecreation & Sports$99kHealth$81kCommunity Improvement$38kArts & Culture$31kHuman Services$29kHousing & Shelter$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k41 grants · $103k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $69k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF PATTERSON PARK$16,500
BACKYARD BASECAMP INC$15,500
FRIENDS OF KIRBY LANE PARK$15,500
BROOKLYN GREENWAY INITIATIVE$11,000
JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
INTERSECTION OF CHANGE$9,730
Village Learning Place$8,500
Marian House Inc$8,500
Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama$8,000
GEDCO$7,500
THE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,500
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$5,000
HOSPITALITY HUB MEMPHIS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Urban Dreams: $7k → 10%HOSPITALITY HUB MEMPHIS: $5k → 17%LANGTON GREEN INC: $5k → 6%LANGTON GREEN INC: $4k → 6%LANGTON GREEN INC: $2k → 6%LANGTON GREEN INC: $2k → 6%BON SECOURS COMMUNITY WORKS: $3k → 19%BON SECOURS COMMUNITY WORKS: $2k → 19%THE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $6k → 19%ROBERTA'S HOUSE INC: $500 → 19%Marian House Inc: $9k → 19%MARIAN HOUSE: $2k → 19%Marian House Inc: $2k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OR
IA
PA
MO
MD
KS
TN
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$535k · 27 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
20

Total granted

$535k
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+18%

Still filing today

74%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    2× · 2017–2019 · $81k · revenue +56%
  • FO
    Friends of Patterson Park Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $24k · revenue +260%
  • TV
    THE VILLAGE LEARNING PLACE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $22k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • DU
    Drury Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $64k · revenue +34%
  • EM
    EMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $41k · revenue -76%
  • UD
    URBAN DREAMS
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue -23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baltimore Green Space

Baltimore Green Space is a land trust that partners with communities to preserve and support community gardens , forest patches , pocket parks , and other community-managed spaces.

Environment
2
Greater Baybrook Alliance Inc

Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…

Community Improvement
3
Greater Baltimore Committee Inc

Greater Baltimore Committee, Inc. is a not-for-profit, civic-interest corporation comprised of business and professional organizations located within the Greater Baltimore Area. Its purpose is to provide a strong, unified and effective…

4
Baltimore Washington Medical Center Inc

The mission of baltimore washington medical center (bwmc) is to provide the highest quality healthcare services to the communities we serve. our vision is to be the preferred regional medical center through nationally recognized quality,…

Health
5
Baltimore Corps Inc

To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…

Employment
6
Blue Water Baltimore

To restore the quality of baltimore's rivers, streams and harbor to foster a healthy environment, a strong economy, and thriving communities.

Environment
7
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
8
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians Inc

Johns hopkins community physicians, inc (jhcp), a valued member of johns hopkins medicine, is a network of medical practices strategically positioned throughout communities in maryland and dc. we strive to meet the needs of each community…

9
University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical System Inc

The mission of umbwms is to provide the highest quality healthcare services to the communities we serve. our vision is to be the preferred regional medical center through nationally recognized quality, personalized service and outstanding…

10
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
11
Baltimore Area Health Education Center

To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings to transform the health of underserved…

Health
12
Baltimore Washington Healthcare Services Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare services to the community we serve through our vision statement: outstanding people, exceptional service and uncompromising quality.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baltimore Washington Medical Center Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Georgetown Waterfront Pa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%32%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/53
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,512

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
27/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Chicago — $80,675 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoDrury University — $64,022 · EducationDrury UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PEN…THE VILLAGE LEARNING PLACE INC — $21,500 · EducationTHE VILLAGE LEARNING PLACE INCBackyard Basecamp Inc — $19,500 · EducationBackyard Basecamp Inc+2 more — $1,500 · EducationBROOKLYN GREENWAY INITIATIVE — $175,321 · EnvironmentBROOKLYN GREENWAY INITIATIVEFriends of Patterson Park Inc — $23,500 · EnvironmentFriends of Patterson Park In…+1 more — $3,000 · EnvironmentEMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $40,896 · OtherEMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF KIRBY LANE PARK LTD — $40,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF KIRBY LANE PARK LTDJACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF WANGARI GARDENS — $9,060 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND — $9,000 · OtherRESERVOIR HILL IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL INC — $9,000 · OtherCommunity Foundation of Northeast Alabama — $12,500 · Other+42 more — $109,485 · Other+42 moreLANGTON GREEN INC — $13,000 · Human ServicesMARIAN HOUSE INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesURBAN DREAMS — $7,000 · Human ServicesTHE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — $5,500 · Human ServicesTHE HOSPITALITY HUB OF MEMPHIS — $5,000 · Human ServicesBon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc — $4,200 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesWashington Parks & People — $27,500 · Community ImprovementREBUILD JOHNSTON SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION INC — $3,500 · Community ImprovementINTERSECTION OF CHANGE INC — $21,240 · HealthJOHNS HOPKINS BAYVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC — $4,000 · HealthFRANKLIN SQUARE HOSPITAL CENTER INC — $2,500 · Health+2 more — $1,000 · HealthGOVANS ECUMENICAL DEVELOPMENT CORP — $16,500 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $500 · Housing & Shelter
Education$237,197Environment$201,821Other$239,941Human Services$47,200Community Improvement$31,000Health$28,740Housing & Shelter$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBROOKLYN GREENWAY INITIATIVE — $175,321 over 5y, 14% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $80,675 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDrury University — $64,022 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $40,896 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWashington Parks & People — $27,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFriends of Patterson Park Inc — $23,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE VILLAGE LEARNING PLACE INC — $21,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetINTERSECTION OF CHANGE INC — $21,240 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBackyard Basecamp Inc — $19,500 over 3y, 62% of budgetGOVANS ECUMENICAL DEVELOPMENT CORP — $16,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLANGTON GREEN INC — $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northeast Alabama — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN HOUSE INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRESERVOIR HILL IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL INC — $9,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetURBAN DREAMS — $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCITY BLOSSOMS INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANNAPOLIS MARITIME MUSEUM INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAsylee Women Enterprise Inc — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARYLAND HALL FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOSPITALITY HUB OF MEMPHIS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc — $4,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS BAYVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF GEORGETOWN WATERFRONT PA — $3,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetREBUILD JOHNSTON SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFILBERT STREET GARDEN — $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBaltimore Washington Medical Center Foundation Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBALTIMORE CLAYWORKS INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRANKLIN SQUARE HOSPITAL CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStillmeadow Community Projects Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTalladega College — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY BUILDERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKS AND PEOPLE INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JAMES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROBERTA'S HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KEY SCHOOL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATING INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRENTON ARBORETUM INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD44.8× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · Chesapeake Bay Trust · Baltimore Civic Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nature Sacred funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • St James Development Corporation Inc100% of income from government
  • Reservoir Hill Improvement Council Inc68% of income from government
  • Parks and People Inc43% of income from government
  • Govans Ecumenical Development Corp28% of income from government
  • Asylee Women Enterprise Inc26% of income from government
  • Roberta's House Inc21% of income from government
  • Intersection of Change Inc20% of income from government
  • The Village Learning Place Inc6% of income from government
  • The American Visionary Art Museum Inc6% of income from government
  • Baltimore Clayworks Inc5% of income from government
  • Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc3% of income from government
  • Maryland Hall for the Creative Arts Inc3% of income from government
  • Marian House Inc2% of income from government
  • Annapolis Maritime Museum Inc2% of income from government
  • Franklin Square Hospital Center Inc0% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph