· Public charity
Chesapeake Bay Trust
CHESAPEAKE BAY TRUST is a public, nonprofit grant-making organization created to promote public awareness of and participation in the restoration and protection of the chesapeake bay and its tributaries.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 267 grants below total $21,506,725 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $27,635,394 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,128,669 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k47 grants · $374k
- $10k–50k129 grants · $3.5M
- $50k–250k73 grants · $7.6M
- $250k+18 grants · $10.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BALTIMORE TREE TRUST | $2,274,240 |
| PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY MARYLAND | $1,085,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY | $928,350 |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION WATERSHED RESTORATION D | $769,943 |
| BALTIMORE COUNTY DEPS | $625,000 |
| SHORERIVERS INC | $599,082 |
| ARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION | $392,853 |
| CHESAPEAKE RIVERS ASSOCIATION | $364,902 |
| NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION | $336,472 |
| SCENIC RIVERS LAND TRUST | $330,324 |
| CLEAN WATER FUND | $325,474 |
| STILLMEADOW COMMUNITY PROJECTS | $316,085 |
| DEFENSORES DE LA CUENCA | $283,000 |
| BLUE WATER BALTIMORE | $281,322 |
| RESILIENCE AUTHORITY OF CHARLES COUNTY | $278,006 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $236k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to train and mobilize community leaders to drive change for sustainable landscapes and clean waters.
The Center brings together diverse interests from the agricultural, forestry, and environmental communities for the purpose of retaining Maryland's working landscapes and the industries they support while protecting and improving the…
Wicomico Environmental Trust supports protecting the environment, with special emphasis on the Wicomico River, its tributaries, and the paleochannel, and other policies that preserve and protect nature in our county and the Chesapeake Bay…
To provide vital advocacy to help maintain and restore one of marylands most valuable resources, the patuxent river.
Land Conservation and Preservation.
The chesapeake audubon society works in the maryland region to promote the stewardship of natural ecosystems through conservation, restoration, education, and advocacy.
The Western Maryland Resource Conservation and Development Councils WMRC&D mission is to build and sustain resource conservation programs which raise the quality of social economic and environmental development in our region.
Cultivating prosperity for farms, business and communities through innovative environmental solutions.
The Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust leads and inspires action to conserve and enhance the landscape of the Mountains to Sound Greenway, ensuring a long-term balance between people and nature.
To promote sound economic, land-use, and transportation policies that preserve the natural environment, open spaces, and rural lands in Montgomery County's Agricultural Reserve for the benefit of all Washington metropolitan area residents.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gunpowder Valley Conservancy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Greentrust Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
164 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 164 of the 255 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BALTIMORE TREE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY INC ↗
- Who funds SHORERIVERS INC ↗
- Who funds ARUNDEL RIVERS FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds Chesapeake Rivers Association ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds SCENIC RIVERS LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
- Who funds Stillmeadow Community Projects Inc ↗
- Who funds DEFENSORES DE LA CUENCA ↗
- Who funds BLUE WATER BALTIMORE ↗
- Who funds LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH AND EDUCATION PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF LANCASTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GREENTRUST ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Nature Forward ↗
- Who funds GREATER REMINGTON IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH PARTNERS FOR THE CHESAPEAKE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD ARTS FOCUS ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL BALTIMORE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds CATOCTIN LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SIXTH BRANCH INC ↗
- Who funds MIDTOWN COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Alice Ferguson Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SEVERN RIVER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND MILLS INTERFAITH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Virginia Environmental Endowment · Baltimore Civic Fund Inc · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Kentfields Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chesapeake Bay Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Baltimore Tree Trust Inc — 100% of income from government
- Greentrust Alliance — 100% of income from government
- World Arts Focus — 100% of income from government
- Defensores De La Cuenca — 100% of income from government
- St James Development Corporation Inc — 100% of income from government
- Maryland Reentry Resource Center — 77% of income from government
- Midtown Community Fund Inc — 73% of income from government
- Nanticoke Watershed Alliance Inc — 70% of income from government
- Civic Works Inc — 63% of income from government
- Greater Baybrook Alliance Inc — 60% of income from government
- Rock Creek Conservancy Inc — 60% of income from government
- Maryland Coastal Bays Foundation Inc — 59% of income from government
- Land and Cultural Preservation Fund Inc — 51% of income from government
- Central Baltimore Partnership Inc — 46% of income from government
- Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
- Greater Remington Improvement Association — 43% of income from government
- Afrithrive Inc — 41% of income from government
- Maryland Assoc for Environmental & Outdoor Educati — 35% of income from government
- Alice Ferguson Foundation Inc — 34% of income from government
- Nature Forward — 32% of income from government
- Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Inc — 28% of income from government
- Chesapeake Conservancy Inc — 27% of income from government
- Maryland Association of Non-Profit Organizations — 27% of income from government
- Phillips Wharf Environmental Center Inc — 21% of income from government
- Intersection of Change Inc — 20% of income from government
- Gunpowder Valley Conservancy Inc — 20% of income from government
- Arundel Rivers Federation Inc — 19% of income from government
- Moonshot Missions Inc — 16% of income from government
- Harford Land Trust Inc — 15% of income from government
- Anacostia Watershed Society Inc — 15% of income from government
- Neighborhood Design Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Shorerivers Inc — 13% of income from government
- South Baltimore Community Land Trust Inc — 11% of income from government
- Adamah Inc — 10% of income from government
- Notre Dame of Maryland University Inc — 9% of income from government
- Sultana Education Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Living Classrooms Foundation — 7% of income from government
- Howard Ecoworks Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Complete Player Charity Ltd — 6% of income from government
- The Howard County Conservancy Inc — 5% of income from government
- Rebuild Metro Inc — 5% of income from government
- Baltimore Clayworks Inc — 5% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Oyster Recovery Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Annapolis Maritime Museum Inc — 2% of income from government
- National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.