· Private foundation
The Woods and Gil Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k67 grants · $172k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE OMPRAKASH FOUNDATION FISCAL AGENT FOR HUMANITY CREW | $10,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC | $9,000 |
| UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC | $7,200 |
| FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEES INC | $7,200 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC | $5,700 |
| SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC | $4,500 |
| SOMERVILLE HOMELESS COALITION INCORPORATED | $4,500 |
| WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $4,300 |
| PROJECT HOPE THE PEOPLE TO PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $4,300 |
| TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY | $4,300 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC | $4,200 |
| BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE | $4,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC | $4,000 |
| AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC | $4,000 |
| HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC | $3,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
72 repeat relationships — 67 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $51k · revenue +21%- FFFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $42k · revenue +74%
SOMERVILLE HOMELESS COALITION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +91%
Funded once
- SPSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INCone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +13%
- A(ALIGHT (AMERICAN REFUGEE COMMITTEE)one grant, 2020 · $2k
- GBGREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +93%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…
To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Refugees international advocates for lifesaving assistance, human rights, and protection for displaced people and promotes solutions to displacement crisis.
To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.
Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…
Civicus is a global alliance of civil society organisations and activists dedicated to strengthening citizen action and civil society throughout the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SCHOOLBOX PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ACLU FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds SOMERVILLE HOMELESS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
- Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
- Who funds United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SUFFOLK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds APOPO US INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds HEADING HOME INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BOSTON WOMEN'S FUND INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL MOMENTUM ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
- Who funds CONSUMER REPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds Hope For The Warriors ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds CASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ INC ↗
- Who funds BAY COVE HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES HOMEWARD INC ↗
- Who funds ROXBURY STONE HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Learning by Giving Foundation Inc · Ploughshares Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Woods and Gil Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bridges Homeward Inc — 77% of income from government
- Bay Cove Human Services Inc — 70% of income from government
- Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc — 32% of income from government
- Somerville Homeless Coalition Inc — 31% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Roxbury Stone House Inc — 29% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Boston Casa Inc — 20% of income from government
- Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
- Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Sojourner House Inc — 11% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Casa Myrna Vazquez Inc — 5% of income from government
- Arts for Learning Massachusetts Inc — 4% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
- Greater Boston Legal Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Food for Free Committee Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Caspar Inc — 1% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Museum of Science — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Woods and Gil Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Woods and Gil Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.