Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Winthrop Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Environment$80kReligion$48kArts & Culture$39kHealth$38kEducation$31kPhilanthropy$29kFood & Nutrition$21kInternational$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$487k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUND FUTURE FOUNDATION$15,000
DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS$5,000
CRIVITZ AREA FOOD PANTRY$3,000
M&M AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,000
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$2,500
INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION$2,500
MULLEN HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
GUILD OF THE CHICAGO HISTORY MUSEUM$2,000
EVANSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
MS SOCIETY COLORADOWYOMING$2,000
KENILWORTH UNION CHURCH$1,500
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES$1,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,000
HISTORIC PRESERVATION FNDN FORTNIGHTLY$1,000
ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $1k → 14%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $1k → 14%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CO
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$290k · 23 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
11

Total granted

$290k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-3%

Still filing today

57%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalFood & NutritionAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DB
    DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $37k · revenue +28%
  • CA
    CRIVITZ AREA FOOD PANTRY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $21k · revenue +10%
  • INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +172%
  • TG
    THE GOOD SHEPHERD
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHARD FOUNDATIONS
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
3
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
Waterstep Inc

Waterstep focuses on providing safe water, sanitation, and hygiene solutions to communities in need around the world. its mission is rooted in the belief that safe water is a basic human right and a critical foundation for health,…

Youth Development
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
8
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
9
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
10
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
11
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
12
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evanston Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Crivitz Area Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MS SOCIETY COLORADOWYOMING: $29,000 · OtherMS SOCIETY COLORADOWYOMINGNORTHFIELD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $28,000 · OtherNORTHFIELD COMMUNITY CHURCHMULLEN HIGH SCHOOL: $21,500 · OtherMULLEN HIGH SCHOOLKENILWORTH UNION CHURCH: $10,500 · OtherKENILWORTH UNION CHURCHNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $7,000 · OtherStorycatchers: $7,000 · OtherGUILD OF THE CHICAGO HISTORY MUSEUM: $7,000 · OtherST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $7,000 · Other+14 more: $37,500 · Other+14 moreDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $37,000 · EnvironmentDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INCSOUND FUTURE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EnvironmentSOUND FUTURE FOUNDATIONTHE WETLANDS INITIATIVE: $8,500 · EnvironmentTHE WETLANDS INITIATIVE+2 more: $3,000 · EnvironmentM & M AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $16,000 · PhilanthropyM & M AREA…Evanston Community Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyEvanston C…BOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyBOCA GRAND…CRIVITZ AREA FOOD PANTRY: $21,000 · Food & NutritionGOOD360: $10,000 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $10,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · AnimalsHISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF THE FORTNIGHTLY: $7,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony Orchestra: $4,000 · Arts & CultureDenver Ballet Guild: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$154,500Environment$78,500Philanthropy$32,000Food & Nutrition$21,000International$20,000Animals$17,500Arts & Culture$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $37,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUND FUTURE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCRIVITZ AREA FOOD PANTRY: $21,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetM & M AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD360: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEvanston Community Foundation: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WETLANDS INITIATIVE: $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetStorycatchers: $7,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF THE FORTNIGHTLY: $7,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Foundation for Education: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT WET FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Water Efficiency: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDenver Ballet Guild: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUND FUTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRIVITZ AREA FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds M & M AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOOD360 ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds Evanston Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Storycatchers ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF THE FORTNIGHTLY ↗
  • Who funds BOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Foundation for Education ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT WET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Water Efficiency ↗
  • Who funds Denver Ballet Guild ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL16× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Charles H and Beverly E Shaw Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · AbbVie Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Winthrop Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Winthrop Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • American Antiquarian Society: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Winthrop’s filings →

More from the funding graph