· Public charity
Inland Southern California United Way
The mission of united way of the inland valleys is to unite people, ideas, and resources with our community to improve lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $34,534 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,545,714 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,511,180 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT | $34,534 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 25 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ISINLAND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED WAY3× · 2017–2019 · $3.4M · revenue +57% · 38% of their budget
- RCRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2020 · $44k · revenue +88%
- T4THRIFTING 4 GIFTING4× · 2017–2020 · $42k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- SNSPRINGBOARD NONPROFIT CONSUMER CREDIT MANAGEMENT INCone grant, 2020 · $23k · revenue -3%
- TFThessalonika Family Services Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +497%
- RARiverside Arts Academygraduatedone grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aims to reduce countywide homelessness while addressing each family's personal struggle with perpetuating homelessness and poverty in their children. Provides both transitional shelter and rapid re-housing options in addition to…
Provide social services to people with developmental disabilities.
IBHS is dedicated to helping the community achieve and maintain general good health, education and welfare through commitment in providing excellent service in the areas of physical health care, substance abuse treatment, mental health…
Creating solutions to improve housing outcomes for renters, homebuyers, homeowners, and those experiencing homelessness through education, advocacy and access to resources in the inland socal region.
Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.
Provide Independent Living Services for persons with developmental disabilities who want to live, work and socialize in the community. Including housing, assistance in entering the workforce, shopping, adult education and other community…
The mission of Family Services is to help children, adults, and families throughout Tulare County heal from violence and thrive in healthy relationships. Family Services will accomplish this mission through direct services, advocacy,…
The mission of the Family Care Network is to enhance the wellbeing of children, adults, and families in partnership with our community.
Milestone House assists disadvantaged children and young adults, primarily those who come from the foster care system, by creating and implementing innovative programs that provide a variety of need services, including treatment services,…
To provide temporary shelter and assistance to homeless families, and also to provide rental assistance in an effort to prevent families from becoming homeless. Program goal is to assist the families in their efforts to become…
On the Rise Inc. is a nonprofit Resource Family Agency dedicated to improving the lives of children in foster care by providing services that recognize the diverse backgrounds of children and non-minor dependents based on trauma informed…
The principal mission of Human Services Association is to provide families with compassionate and comprehensive care to promote wellness and build strong communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is Riverside Arts Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INLAND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THRIFTING 4 GIFTING ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds INLAND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 211 ↗
- Who funds United Way of the Desert ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
- Who funds Assistance League of Riverside California ↗
- Who funds PATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE EMPOWERMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds AXIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAROLYN E WYLIE CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SPRINGBOARD NONPROFIT CONSUMER CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds iFoster Inc ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds WALDEN ENVIRONMENT DBA WALDEN FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SAN GORGONIO PASS ↗
- Who funds Arlington Temporary Assistance Inc ↗
- Who funds INLAND EMPIRE LATINO LAWYERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Oak Grove Institute Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JANET GOESKE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Thessalonika Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Riverside Arts Academy ↗
- Who funds JURUPA MOUNTAINS CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION OF RIVERSIDE ↗
- Who funds Inspire Life Skills Training Inc ↗
- Who funds ONTARIO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JACOBS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH INC ↗
- Who funds THINK TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT PROSPECT ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHWEST COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER REDLA RIVERSIDE ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE MEDICAL CLINIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Weingart Foundation · The California Endowment · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Regional Access Project Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Inland Empire United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Inland Southern California United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.