Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Taishoff Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$515k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$5.4MHuman Services$2.1MPhilanthropy$1.1MPublic Benefit$847kHealth$800kAnimals$659kReligion$501kRecreation & Sports$333kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $184k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $553k
  • $250k+2 grants · $891k
$25,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Syracuse University$515,000
Promise Landing Farm Inc$375,500
St Dunstan's Episcopal Church$140,000
Syracuse - Lacrosse Hall of Fame$100,000
Messiah University$100,000
Annapolis Area Christian School$58,000
Broadcaster's Foundation of America$55,000
Bay Ridge Christian Church$50,000
National Down Syndrome Society$50,000
Frontline Pheonix Foundation$40,000
Eagle Mount - Bozeman$36,000
Samaritan's Purse$25,000
Gigi's Playhouse$23,800
Nami of Collier County$23,000
CRAB$16,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%WOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND: $1k → 11%Melwood: $5k → 11%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $3k → 10%Promise Landing Farm Inc: $376k → 11%Promise Landing Farm Inc: $227k → 11%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $3k → 10%Promise Landing Farm Inc: $184k → 11%CAMP GRATITUTE: $4k → 11%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $3k → 10%Golden Paw's Assistance Dogs: $11k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $1k → 10%PAWS Assistance Dogs: $2k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $1k → 10%PROMISE LANDING FARM INC: $305k → 6%PROMISE LANDING FARM INC: $301k → 6%BAY COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES: $38k → 6%PROMISE LANDING FARM INC: $247k → 6%BAY COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES: $20k → 6%PROMISE LANDING FARM INC: $125k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of The Taishoff Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 4% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Taishoff Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 39 repeat orgs$694k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
22

Total granted

$12M
$389k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+54%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $305k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +45%
  • PL
    PROMISE LANDING FARM INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +163% · 98% of their budget
  • AA
    ANNAPOLIS AREA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • WC
    WHOLE CHILD LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $80k
  • N
    NDSC
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • NE
    NAPLES EQUESTRIAN CHALLENGE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $75k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

2
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

6
Easter Seals Massachusetts Inc

Easter seals massachusetts is a statewide community-based organization that has been helping people with disabilities to live full and independent lives for over 75 years. our mission is to provide services to ensure that children and…

Health
7
Minnesota Paralyzed Veterans of America

The minnesota paralyzed veterans of america (mnpva) a minnesota nonprofit organization, is an officially recognized paralyzed veterans of america chapter. mnpva assists veterans with spinal cord injuries or spinal cord diseases, such as ms…

8
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
9
Lakeshore Foundation

To provide opportunity for individuals with disability to live a healthy lifestyle through physical activity, research, advocacy and health promotion.

Health
10
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
11
Paralyzed Veterans of America

Paralyzed veterans of america (pva) was founded by a group of world war ii veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders in 1947. following decades of dedicated advocacy and service for other similarly situated veterans, pva was…

Health
12
Special Olympics Inc

Special olympics strives to create a better world by fostering the acceptance and inclusion of people of all abilities through sports, health and education programs.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Minnesota Twinstars Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersFaith-Based Senior LivingFood Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support OrganizationsHospice Care ServicesClassical Music EnsemblesVeteran Support ServicesYouth Development CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Government Accountability R…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Independent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%19%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%43%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,518

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
32/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $3,445,050 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYANNAPOLIS AREA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $1,321,349 · EducationANNAPOLIS AREA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL+3 more — $216,850 · EducationPATRIOT POINT LLC — $756,500 · OtherPATRIOT POINT LLCCRAB — $546,500 · OtherCRABBROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $475,000 · OtherBROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICAREVOLUTIONARY LEARNING CENTER — $345,000 · OtherREVOLUTIONARY LEARNING CENTERNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY — $225,537 · OtherNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETYMOUNT ZION HEBREW CONGREGATION — $175,000 · OtherBAY RIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $171,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $164,830 · OtherST DUNSTANS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $140,000 · Other+39 more — $1,028,619 · Other+39 morePROMISE LANDING FARM INC — $1,763,956 · Human ServicesPROMISE LANDING …+5 more — $89,600 · Human ServicesEagle Mount — $1,143,000 · PhilanthropyEagle Moun…MINNESOTA TWINSTARS ACADEMY — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsEASTPORT YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $47,500 · Recreation & SportsCHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATING INC — $30,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $3,000 · Recreation & SportsNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $120,000 · Community ImprovementMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION — $107,500 · AnimalsCOMO FRIENDS — $5,000 · Animals
Education$4,983,249Other$4,028,586Human Services$1,853,556Philanthropy$1,143,000Recreation & Sports$130,500Community Improvement$120,000Animals$112,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $3,445,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISE LANDING FARM INC — $1,763,956 over 7y, 98% of budgetANNAPOLIS AREA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $1,321,349 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetEagle Mount — $1,143,000 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetBROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $475,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY — $225,537 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $120,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY — $112,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION — $107,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $98,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC — $67,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe National Press Foundation Inc — $62,019 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetBAY COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $57,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $52,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILITARY BOWL FOUNDATION INC — $51,850 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLEASHES OF VALOR — $50,500 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetMINNESOTA TWINSTARS ACADEMY — $50,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetEASTPORT YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $47,500 over 3y, 27% of budgetCHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATING INC — $30,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetNAMI Collier County Inc — $28,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc — $22,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES — $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAvow Foundation Inc — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $7,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMO FRIENDS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE MASS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL STRIDES INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUKE'S WINGS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE CONNECTIONS FOR CANCER SUPPORT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED VETERANS RELIEF FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTAND AMONG FRIENDS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PROMISE LANDING FARM INC
  • Who funds ANNAPOLIS AREA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds Eagle Mount
  • Who funds BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
  • Who funds MESSIAH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC
  • Who funds The National Press Foundation Inc
  • Who funds BAY COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MILITARY BOWL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LEASHES OF VALOR
  • Who funds MINNESOTA TWINSTARS ACADEMY
  • Who funds EASTPORT YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Frontline Phoenix Foundation Inc
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATING INC
  • Who funds NAMI Collier County Inc
  • Who funds Golden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Taishoff Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Special Strides Inc2% of income from government
  • Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Taishoff Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Taishoff Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph