Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stricof Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$164kInternational$59kArts & Culture$50kReligion$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$39kHuman Services$39kEducation$32kHealth$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$720k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NO KILL PROJECT PLANET INC$15,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
B'NAI SHALOM$5,000
LELAND YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION$5,000
LEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC$5,000
AFRICAN ANGEL ALLIANCE$3,500
MADISON SCHOOL DISTRICT$3,000
JEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METRO WEST INC$3,000
MILAGRO CENTER$3,000
211 COMMUNITY IMPACT$3,000
TRAVERSE AREA PICKLEBALL ASSOCIATION$2,500
CHILDS PTO INC$2,500
JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER$2,000
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $4k → 10%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FOSTER CARE OPTIONS: $2k → 13%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $5k → 9%FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN ENSLAVED IN WAR: $6k → 7%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $3k → 10%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $4k → 9%FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN ENSLAVED IN WAR: $6k → 7%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $2k → 10%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $3k → 9%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 10%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $1k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $1k → 9%JEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METRO WEST INC: $3k → 16%FRIENDS OF LAKE LEELANAU: $4k → 7%FRIENDS OF LAKE LEELANAU: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$426k · 30 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
30

Total granted

$426k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+47%

Still filing today

67%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +98%
  • MF
    MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $33k · revenue +15%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • BH
    BOCA HELPING HANDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +121%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • MT
    MILTON TOWNSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
5
Air Transport Association of America Inc

Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…

—
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
9
Organ Procurement Agency of Michigan

We honor life through donation.

—
10
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation

The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…

Health
11
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Women and Children Enslaved in War. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
30/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $46,676 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBNAI SHALOM: $37,000 · OtherBNAI SHALOMNO KILL PROJECT PLANET INC: $15,000 · OtherNO KILL PROJECT PLANET INCMADISON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10,500 · OtherTRAVERSE CITY PARKS AND RECREATION: $9,545 · OtherLEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC: $10,000 · OtherFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · Other+38 more: $104,060 · Other+38 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $37,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KIT…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDA…ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $5,000 · InternationalACTION AGAINST HU…Friends of Herman Park Inc: $74,340 · Recreation & SportsFriends of Herm…4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $13,500 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR …FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN ENSLAVED IN WAR: $12,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION …JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesJEANNE GEIG…FRIENDS OF LAKE LEELANAU: $5,030 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF …JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $4,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMI…JEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METROWEST INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH SERV…Jewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc: $2,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,103 · Human ServicesMILAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 · Arts & CultureMILAGRO F…INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $9,500 · Arts & CultureINTERLOCH…+1 more: $1,060 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC: $1,000 · HealthNational Stuttering Association: $1,000 · Health+2 more: $750 · HealthTRAVERSE AREA PICKLEBALL ASSOCIATION: $11,215 · Community ImprovementAFRICAN ANGEL ALLIANCE: $4,500 · Community Improvement
Other$243,781International$84,000Recreation & Sports$74,340Human Services$51,633Arts & Culture$43,560Health$18,250Community Improvement$15,715

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFriends of Herman Park Inc: $74,340 over 5y, 83% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $37,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMILAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN ENSLAVED IN WAR: $12,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKE LEELANAU: $5,030 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLELAND YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN ANGEL ALLIANCE: $4,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEE COUNTY JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHosts for Hospitals: $3,250 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLIVINGSTON FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $3,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTUCSON PARKS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetJEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METROWEST INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,150 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLIE GOLF ONE: $1,600 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $1,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Stuttering Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE LEELANAU LAKE ASSOCIATION: $650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA CHANCE IN LIFEINC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stricof Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stricof Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 40%
  • Jeanne Geiger Crisis Center Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stricof Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph