· Private foundation
The Stricof Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k28 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NO KILL PROJECT PLANET INC | $15,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $5,000 |
| B'NAI SHALOM | $5,000 |
| LELAND YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| LEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC | $5,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA | $5,000 |
| AFRICAN ANGEL ALLIANCE | $3,500 |
| JEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METRO WEST INC | $3,000 |
| MILAGRO CENTER | $3,000 |
| 211 COMMUNITY IMPACT | $3,000 |
| MADISON SCHOOL DISTRICT | $3,000 |
| TRAVERSE AREA PICKLEBALL ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
| CHILDS PTO INC | $2,500 |
| JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER | $2,000 |
| COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC8× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +98%- MFMILAGRO FOUNDATION INC2× · 2024–2025 · $33k · revenue +15%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- BHBOCA HELPING HANDS INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +121%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $6k
- MTMILTON TOWNSHIPone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.
Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.
We honor life through donation.
The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Women and Children Enslaved in War. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Friends of Herman Park Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN ENSLAVED IN WAR ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRAVERSE AREA PICKLEBALL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LAKE LEELANAU ↗
- Who funds LELAND YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN ANGEL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LEE COUNTY JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hosts for Hospitals ↗
- Who funds LIVINGSTON FIRST AID SQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METROWEST INC ↗
- Who funds TUCSON PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stricof Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jeanne Geiger Crisis Center Inc — 40% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.