· Private foundation
The Ruttenbergkagan Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k65 grants · $161k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $97k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO | $69,500 |
| ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE | $20,000 |
| ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK | $15,000 |
| WTTW JEWISH HERITAGE PROGRAMMING | $12,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES | $10,000 |
| CHICAGO'S WOMENS HEALTH CENTER | $10,000 |
| CHICAGO CRED | $10,000 |
| GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY | $10,000 |
| YOUTH FOR A BETTER FUTURE | $10,000 |
| TEMPLE SHALOM | $9,350 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| PROJECT EDUCATION PLUS | $6,000 |
| CHICAGO GAY MEN'S CHORUS | $6,000 |
| INVEST FOR KIDS | $5,000 |
| YOUTH GUIDANCE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
50 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JUJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO6× · 2020–2025 · $362k · revenue +13%
- ALANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE4× · 2021–2025 · $52k · revenue +34%
- YGYouth Guidance5× · 2021–2025 · $38k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- JAJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCILone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -28%
- WSWOLCOTT SCHOOLone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +14%
- FOFRIENDS OF BENNETT DAY SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +195%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.
The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Contemporary Art and the most unlike its peers is Chicago Cred Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Youth Guidance ↗
- Who funds WOLCOTT SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
- Who funds HAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds Youth for A Better Future ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds PROJECT EDUCATION PLUS ↗
- Who funds FAMILY FOCUS LEGACY ↗
- Who funds ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds BRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Chicago Gay Mens Chorus ↗
- Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
- Who funds CHRISTOPHER HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds STREET SOCCER USA INC ↗
- Who funds Chicago Cred Inc ↗
- Who funds Invest for Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
- Who funds IMERMAN ANGELS ↗
- Who funds Outreach with Lacrosse Schools ↗
- Who funds THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BENNETT DAY SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Kovler Family Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pritzker Pucker Family Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Ruttenberg Arts Foundation · Imc Chicago Charitable Foundation · Field Foundation of Illinois · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ruttenbergkagan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Ruttenbergkagan Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Ruttenbergkagan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.