Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Rosewood Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2022
14
Grants FY2022
14
Organizations funded FY2022
29%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Rosewood Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Rosewood Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $16k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’17
7
’18
8
’19
15
’20
11
’21
11
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2022
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$4,120
Organizations funded a year
12 to 16
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
4
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 29% of the organizations The Rosewood Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 33% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
PhilanthropyInternationalEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202214$16k29%
FY202114$14k43%
FY202016$15k69%
FY201912$21k33%
FY201812$14k17%
FY201716$14kn/a
93% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$294kFood & Nutrition$30kEducation$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kRecreation & Sports$5kCommunity Improvement$5kEmployment$5kArts & Culture$4kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
KY
MD
DC
OK

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 32 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($16k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Rosewood Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHidden Harvest Corporation: $26,120 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetColgate University: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetReading in Motion: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJobtrain Inc: $4,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWorld Central Kitchen Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMax and Marion Caldwell Foundation: $3,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetDowntown College Prep Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding San Diego: $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCygnet Theatre Company: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPreparatory Foundation Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBrightfocus Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest of Silicon Valley: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetScripps Health: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRising Treetops at Oakhurst: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Kentucky Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRotary Camp Pendleton Foundation fka Pendleton Community Service Fund: $750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSchool the World Inc: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Wildlife Fund Inc: $525 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Center of San Francisco: $518 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetValle Monte League: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Boston Food Bank Inc: $475 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMid Hudson Animal Aid Inc: $325 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFolds of Honor Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTheatreworks Silicon Valley: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Innocence Project Inc: $210 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrevor Project Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHispanic Federation Inc: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInspire Arts and Music Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWikimedia Foundation Inc: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 31.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Rosewood Foundation with peer funders

About The Rosewood Foundation

How much does The Rosewood Foundation give?
The Rosewood Foundation reported 14 grants totaling $15,938 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 16 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does The Rosewood Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Philanthropy (76%), Food & Nutrition (8%), Education (7%).
Who are The Rosewood Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Hidden Harvest Corporation ($26k), Colgate University ($13k), Reading in Motion ($5k).
Does The Rosewood Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 29% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Rosewood Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Rosewood Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Chicago Community Trust, Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc, Silicon Valley Community Foundation.
Where is The Rosewood Foundation based?
The Rosewood Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosewood’s filings →

More from the funding graph