Skip to content
The Rosendin Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Rosendin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
125
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$1.1MHealth$765kFood & Nutrition$570kHousing & Shelter$347kYouth Development$324kCrime & Legal$301kEmployment$180kEducation$141kOther$0
02FY2024 · 125 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k25 grants · $131k
  • $10k–50k87 grants · $1.6M
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $650k
$14,100
Median grant
14
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POVERELLO HOUSE$50,000
LOVE NEVER FAILS$50,000
CHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY$50,000
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK$50,000
LAWS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES$50,000
HABILITAT INC$50,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LAS VEGAS$50,000
FAMILY HOUSE INC$50,000
HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES$50,000
HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION$50,000
LIFEMOVES$50,000
RECOVERY CAFE SAN JOSE$50,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF TEMPLE$47,932
KEATONS CHILD CANCER ALLIANCE$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $996k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $10k → 11%TEEN ESTEEM: $10k → 9%NATE'S PLACE A WELLNESS AND RECOVER CENTER: $15k → 10%GIVING 365 INC: $10k → 11%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS: $10k → 14%ELGIN CARES: $10k → 12%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $10k → 10%SHINING HOPE FARMS: $8k → 12%CARING SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $50k → 13%SECOND CHANCES GARAGE INC: $15k → 6%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $10k → 8%HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND: $20k → 19%NATE'S PLACE A WELLNESS AND RECOVER CENTER: $10k → 10%THE TEEN PROJECT INC: $20k → 14%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $8k → 11%HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC: $10k → 19%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $8k → 11%HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES: $50k → 8%HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND: $8k → 19%RECOVERY CAFE SAN JOSE: $50k → 8%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $8k → 11%SAFE ALLIANCE: $25k → 10%PATRIOTS AND PAWS: $10k → 10%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 14%SECOND STORY: $15k → 6%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA: $35k → 11%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $10k → 8%LAURA'S HOUSE: $10k → 10%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $25k → 11%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $8k → 8%LAURA'S HOUSE: $10k → 10%PROJECT 150: $25k → 13%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $10k → 11%A FARM LESS ORDINARY: $10k → 4%CORNERSTONES INC: $20k → 6%CORNERSTONES INC: $20k → 6%ONE SMALL STEP: $25k → 11%CORNERSTONES INC: $10k → 6%THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD: $15k → 14%ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FOR FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENTS: $35k → 11%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $10k → 8%ARIZONANS FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 11%LIFEOLOGY AZ INC: $25k → 11%LIFEOLOGY AZ INC: $10k → 11%BACKPACK FRIENDS INC: $25k → 10%BACKPACK FRIENDS INC: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of The Rosendin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 29% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 27%.

The Rosendin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 88 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

88 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 80 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

88
100

Total granted

$2.2M
$592k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+19%

Still filing today

94%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MOBILE HOPE ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $80k · revenue +7%
  • FH
    FAMILY HOUSE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +415%
  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $73k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +217%
  • WG
    Women Giving Back Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +9%
  • OT
    ONE TRIBE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
4
Housing Works

Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.

Housing & Shelter
5
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
6
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
7
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
8
Family Assistance Ministries

Family assistance ministries is a faith-based charitable non-profit organization assisting those in need in southern orange county with resources for food, shelter, and personalized counsel and aid, helping clients bridge the gap from…

Philanthropy
9
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
10
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
11
Sunnyvale Community Services

The mission of sunnyvale community services is to prevent homelessness and hunger for low-income sunnyvale residents facing temporary crises.

Human Services
12
Farming Hope

Farming hope's mission is three-fold: 1) the organization provides job training for homeless folks and people with criminal histories, 2) farming hope provides meals and groceries for low income families, and 3) farming hope seeks to…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is Cooking Autism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

239 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 239 of the 271 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
47
Early backer (in before they grew)
234/239
Grantees still filing
146/239
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES: $72,500 · Human ServicesHOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICESCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $70,000 · Human ServicesCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CP…HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $50,000 · Human ServicesRecovery Cafe San Jose: $50,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesBACKPACK FRIENDS INCORPORATED: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesSafe Alliance Inc: $37,500 · Human ServicesLIFEOLOGY AZ INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesArizona Association for Foster and Adoptive Parents: $35,000 · Human Services+37 more: $509,800 · Human Services+37 moreLIFEMOVES: $65,000 · OtherCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $72,500 · Other+79 more: $1,397,432 · Other+79 moreFAMILY HOUSE INC: $75,000 · HealthFAMILY HOUSE I…PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $50,000 · HealthPEOPLE'S COMMU…HABILITAT INC: $50,000 · HealthHABILITAT INCKEATON'S CHILD CANCER ALLIANCE: $40,000 · HealthKEATON'S CHILD…THE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT: $32,450 · HealthTHE PEACEFUL P…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $30,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FO…Carolina Breast Friends Inc: $30,000 · HealthCarolina Breas…OLIVE CREST: $20,000 · HealthCommunity Free Clinic Inc: $20,000 · Health+18 more: $178,900 · Health+18 moreMOBILE HOPE ASSOCIATION: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentFUTURE FOR KIDS: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ANNAPOLIS & ANNE ARUNDEL: $25,000 · Youth Development+7 more: $59,000 · Youth DevelopmentCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $60,000 · Food & NutritionSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $35,000 · Food & NutritionWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $25,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $20,000 · Food & NutritionANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $17,500 · Food & NutritionALOHA HARVEST: $15,000 · Food & NutritionCOASTAL BEND FOOD BANK: $12,500 · Food & NutritionHigh Desert Food & Farm Alliance: $10,000 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionTHREE SQUARE: $10,000 · Food & NutritionUnited Food Bank: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionPFOOD PFAIRNESS IN PFLUGERVILLE SCHOOLS: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $17,500 · Food & NutritionASSISTING LIVES IN LAS VEGAS: $55,000 · Community ImprovementAspiring Texas Latinos Achieving Success Together: $50,000 · Community ImprovementTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementGALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC: $27,500 · Community ImprovementURBAN COMMUNITY OUTREACH INCORPORATED: $25,000 · Community ImprovementSAHELI: $10,000 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationMARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION: $30,000 · EducationShe Built This City: $20,000 · EducationCLASSROOM CENTRAL INC: $15,000 · EducationEDUCATION SERVICE CENTER REGION XIII: $14,025 · EducationKINGDOM CAUSES BELLFLOWER: $10,000 · EducationBookSpring: $10,000 · EducationDENVER KIDS INC: $7,593 · Education+3 more: $15,000 · Education
Human Services$989,800Other$1,534,932Health$526,350Youth Development$304,000Food & Nutrition$262,500Community Improvement$197,500Education$171,618

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOBILE HOPE ASSOCIATION: $80,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $72,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetHOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES: $72,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTING LIVES IN LAS VEGAS: $55,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetHELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAspiring Texas Latinos Achieving Success Together: $50,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetLove Never Fails Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPoverello House: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHABILITAT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRecovery Cafe San Jose: $50,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCORNERSTONES INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF TEMPLE TEXAS: $47,932 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $45,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetRRUFF HEALING HEROES: $45,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetFUTURE FOR KIDS: $45,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetWEAVE INC: $42,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBACKPACK FRIENDS INCORPORATED: $40,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetSAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHEART OF OREGON CORPS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetKEATON'S CHILD CANCER ALLIANCE: $40,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetHONOR VETERANS NOW: $40,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetSafe Alliance Inc: $37,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $37,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEOLOGY AZ INC: $35,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetArizona Association for Foster and Adoptive Parents: $35,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $32,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetASHLEYS PLACE-SUMNER CHILD ADVOCACY: $32,500 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetTHE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT: $32,450 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetMARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION: $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT 150: $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCarolina Breast Friends Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGALLATIN SHALOM ZONE INC: $27,500 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY OUTREACH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVETERANS BRIDGE HOME INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

United Way for Greate…The Robert D and Marc…United Way of Greater…Van Metre Companies F…The Presbyterian Hosp…The Leon Levine Found…Speedway Children's C…The Autzen FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…Washington Federal Fo…San Jose Mercury News…Austin Community Foun…
United Way for Greater AustinTX27.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Greater Austin · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Van Metre Companies Foundation Inc · The Presbyterian Hospital · The Leon Levine Foundation · Speedway Children's Charities · The Autzen Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Washington Federal Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rosendin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rosendin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Neighborimpact: 68% of income from government
  • Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery: 60% of income from government
  • High Desert Food & Farm Alliance: 45% of income from government
  • Grow Portland: 36% of income from government
  • Portland YouthBuilders: 35% of income from government
  • Maryland Center for Construction Education and Innovation: 29% of income from government
  • Heart of Oregon Corps Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • The House of Ruth Maryland Inc: 19% of income from government
  • United Communities Against Poverty Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Homeplate Youth Services: 17% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Clubs of Bend Inc: 16% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Healing Reins Equine Assisted Services Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Casa of Central Oregon: 2% of income from government
  • The Peaceful Presence Project: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
89report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rosendin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Rosendin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 271 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosendin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home