· Private foundation
Van Metre Companies Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k30 grants · $112k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $110k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $173k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITAL | $100,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON DC & NORTHERN VIRGINIA | $73,020 |
| LUKE'S WINGS | $15,000 |
| INOVA HEALTH FOUNDATION (THE BIG DIG) | $15,000 |
| ME & YOU | $10,430 |
| OUR MINDS MATTER | $10,000 |
| HOMEAID NORTHERN VIRGINIA | $10,000 |
| MANNA FOODBANK | $10,000 |
| ST JOHNS COMMUNITY SERVICES | $10,000 |
| PARKINSON FOUNDATION OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA | $10,000 |
| SECOND STORY | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| INOVA HEALTH FOUNDATION (UNITED BANK COMMUNITY FUND) | $9,020 |
| MOBILE HOPE | $7,500 |
| LOUDOUN HUNGER RELIEF | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $504k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2022 · $494k · revenue +72%
- HTHousing Trust Fund of Northern Virginia (dba Homeaid Northern Virginia)6× · 2017–2024 · $159k · revenue +2%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON DC & NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC2× · 2023–2024 · $142k · revenue +141%
Funded once
- CUCENTRAL UNION MISSIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +26%
- LCLOUDOUN COUNTY HUNGER RELIEFone grant, 2020 · $35k
- YYMCAone grant, 2019 · $33k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
For children's sake is dedicated to promoting positive environments for children and families that develop trust, stability and independence.
Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.
We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.
Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
The mission of CHSVA is to build strong permanent families and lifelong relationships for Virginia's at risk children and youth.
District alliance for safe housing, inc. (dash) is an innovator in providing access to safe housing and services to survivors of domestic and sexual violence and their families as they rebuild their lives on their own terms.
The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.
We support the holistic needs of individuals and families at risk of or experiencing homelessness. Housing is our starting point. Seeing people thrive is our finish line.
Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…
Amplify the work of our community by bringing people and resources together.
Low-income housing.
To grow community giving by fostering a community of grantmakers, promoting strategic local leadership, and investing in partnerships for the benefit of the community of loudoun and northern fauquier.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Alexandria's Children and the most unlike its peers is Cooking Autism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STILLBRAVE CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Housing Trust Fund of Northern Virginia (dba Homeaid Northern Virginia) ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON DC & NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds Shelter House Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN VIRGINIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Paytons Project ↗
- Who funds FAUQUIER FAMILY SHELTER SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HERO HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds DULLES SOUTH FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds FROM ME TO YOU ↗
- Who funds Parkinson Foundation of the National Capital Area ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL UNION MISSION ↗
- Who funds The IIIB's Foundation ↗
- Who funds BAILEY'S CROSSROADS HEALTH ACCESS PARTNE ↗
- Who funds DOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds LUKE'S WINGS ↗
- Who funds A FARM LESS ORDINARY ↗
- Who funds FACETS CARES INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LOUDOUN COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds Capital Hospice ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · Community Foundation for Loudoun and Northern Fauquier Counties · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · The Closet of the Greater Herndon Area Inc · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Alloy Family Foundation Inc · Ada L and Albert M Wibel Foundation · The Rosendin Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Van Metre Companies Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Capital Hospice — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Van Metre Companies Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Van Metre Companies Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.