· Private foundation
The Richard and Elizabeth Boggio Fo
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $89k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $127k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PETS ALIVE | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| GIVE ME SHELTER PROJECT | $20,400 |
| GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER | $12,000 |
| MIDDLETOWN HUMANE SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| POSH PETS RESCUE | $10,000 |
| FNE INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| UPPER KEYS HUMANE SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,000 |
| WINDHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| BOBBI AND THE STRAYS | $5,000 |
| THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER | $5,000 |
| CATSKILL ANIMAL RESCUE | $5,000 |
| SPRINGFIELD HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| KITTY KIND | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GMGive Me Shelter Project Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $165k · revenue +232%
- WCWINDHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY8× · 2017–2024 · $109k · revenue +47%
- OWORPHANED WILDLIFE CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTYone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -45%
- WOWINGS OF RESCUE INCone grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +17%
- UAUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS (REDROVER)one grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.
We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…
Animal Welfare
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
Animal care and rescue
The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…
Animal Welfare
Battling against the overpopulation of homeless pets and improving the lives of companion animals through rescue, fostering programs, adoption, pet care, educational programs and of course spaying and neutering.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is The Whelan Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Give Me Shelter Project Inc ↗
- Who funds RUFF HOUSE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds WINDHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ORPHANED WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds BOBBI AND THE STRAYS INC ↗
- Who funds FNE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PETS ALIVE INC ↗
- Who funds The Lowell School ↗
- Who funds DOGS DESERVE BETTER INC ↗
- Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds SULLIAN COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds Springfield Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CATSKILL ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds WOODLANDS WILDLIFE REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds Posh Pets Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER ↗
- Who funds UPPER KEYS HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds Pets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWS ↗
- Who funds OLLIES ANGELS ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds PATRICIA H LADEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ANIMAL RESCUE US INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA KEYS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds WINGS OF RESCUE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Petsmart Charities Inc · American Express Foundation · Greater Good Charities · Pet Peeves Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Salesforce Foundation · Humane Society of Monroe Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Richard and Elizabeth Boggio Fo funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Harbor House of Central Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
- Upper Keys Humane Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.