Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Pet Peeves Inc

To protect and help long island's abused, abandoned, and neglected pets and animals.

$49k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.

Animals$645kHousing & Shelter$30k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $9,426 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $48,852 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $39,426 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$9,426
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YORKIE 911 RESCUE$9,426
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 8% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ANIMAL LIFELINE OF BELLMORE: $15k → 6%KENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $20k → 7%FOR OUR FRIENDS: $9k → 13%PIT OF OUR SOULS RESCUE INC: $13k → 6%RIVERHEAD SHELTER VOLUNTEER PROGRAM: $11k → 7%FOR OUR FRIENDS: $8k → 13%POINEERS FOR ANIMAL: $10k → 6%RIVERHEAD SHELTER VOLUNTEER PROGRAM: $9k → 7%POINEERS FOR ANIMAL: $10k → 6%ANIMAL LIFELINE OF BELLMORE: $8k → 6%BILLYS LOVING CATS: $15k → 13%GOLDEN PAW SOCIETY INC: $8k → 7%GIVE ME SHELTER PROJECT: $10k → 13%POSH PETS RESCUE: $10k → 6%TENDER LOVING CATS INC: $10k → 7%YORKIE 911 RESCUE: $10k → 7%TENDER LOVING CATS INC: $10k → 7%YORKIE 911 RESCUE: $10k → 7%TENDER LOVING CATS INC: $10k → 7%YORKIE 911 RESCUE: $9k → 7%LAST HOPE INC: $16k → 6%LAST HOPE INC: $11k → 6%ALMOST HOME ANIMAL RESCUE: $14k → 7%LAST HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 6%ALMOST HOME ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 7%LAST HOPE INC: $10k → 6%HELPING PROMOTE ANIMAL WELFARE: $10k → 7%LONG BEACH HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 6%PAWS OF WAR FOR VETERANS: $10k → 7%LAST HOPE INC: $9k → 6%ALLEYKATTZ INC: $10k → 6%ALMOST HOME ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 7%HELPING PROMOTE ANIMAL WELFARE: $10k → 7%RUFF HOUSE RESCUE: $10k → 6%RUFF HOUSE RESCUE: $9k → 6%PROUD RESCUERS OF PR: $10k → 7%SAVE-A-PET ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $16k → 7%HOME SWEET HOME ANIMAL RESCUE OF LI: $10k → 7%SAVE-A-PET ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10k → 7%VOLUNTEERS FOR WILDLIFE INC: $10k → 6%PROUD RESCUERS OF PR: $10k → 7%SAVE-A-PET ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10k → 7%PROUD RESCUERS OF PR: $10k → 7%JAKES RESCUE RANCH INC: $10k → 6%HOME SWEET HOME ANIMAL RESCUE OF LI: $10k → 7%HOME SWEET HOME ANIMAL RESCUE OF LI: $9k → 7%AMARYLLIS FARM EQUINE RESCUE: $10k → 7%GUARDIANS OF RESCUE: $9k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$546k · 21 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
15

Total granted

$546k
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-14%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAVE A PET ANIMAL RESCUE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $48k · revenue +275%
  • LH
    LAST HOPE INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $46k · revenue +56%
  • TL
    TENDER LOVING CATS INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $38k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • BL
    BILLYS LOVING CATS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +120% · 43% of their budget
  • PO
    PIT OF OUR SOULS RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -59%
  • JR
    JAKES RESCUE RANCH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
3
Jl Animal Rescue Inc
Animals
4
All About Animals Rescue Inc

Rescue and rehome homeless cats and dogs

Animals
5
All About the Cats Rescue Inc

Rescue, save and possibly re-home animals in need.

Animals
6
Little Kitten Rescue Inc

to rescue animals in need of veterinary care and to spay and neuter

—
7
Rescued Paws Inc

Rescue neglected animals

—
8
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
9
Boardwalk Pet Rescue

Pet rescue

Animals
10
Rescuing Animals in Need Inc

Rehome dogs and cats from owner surrenders and animal shelters finding them new homes

Animals
11
Saving Animals in Need Today

Cat care and cat adoption - intake homeless owner surrendered cats provide them with veterinary care feed and house them until adopted

Animals
12
Pet Rescue Solutions

Pet rescue

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is PETS4LUV Foundation and the most unlike its peers is S and H Korn Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%16%5–10yr21%42%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr16%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%18%5–10yr21%38%10–20yr18%24%20–35yr11%15%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
2/36
the rest of the field
10%
1,700/16,512

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
20/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAVE A PET ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $47,872 · AnimalsSAVE A PET ANIMAL RESCUE INCLAST HOPE INC — $45,900 · AnimalsLAST HOPE INCTENDER LOVING CATS INC — $37,500 · AnimalsTENDER LOVING CATS INCALMOST HOME ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC — $33,500 · AnimalsALMOST HOME ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INCADA HOWE KENT MEMORIAL SHELTER INC — $33,250 · AnimalsADA HOWE KENT MEMORIAL SHELTER INCRUFF HOUSE RESCUE INC — $31,122 · AnimalsRUFF HOUSE RESCUE INCFOR OUR FRIENDS INC — $30,000 · AnimalsFOR OUR FRIENDS INCPROUD RESCUERS OF PR INC a/k/a Proud Rescuers of Puerto Rico — $30,000 · AnimalsPROUD RESCUERS OF PR INC a/k/a Proud Rescuers of Puerto RicoYORKIE911 RESCUE INC — $29,426 · AnimalsHOME SWEET HOME ANIMAL RESCUE OF LONG ISLAND INC — $29,000 · AnimalsPIONEERS FOR ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC — $25,872 · AnimalsANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC — $20,000 · Animals+14 more — $166,816 · Animals+14 moreANIMAL LIFELINE CORP INC — $22,500 · OtherANIMAL LIFEL…LAST HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE — $10,000 · OtherLAST HOPE AN…LONG BEACH HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 · OtherLONG BEACH H…LONG ISLAND CAT KITTEN SOLUTION INC — $6,750 · OtherLONG ISLAND …LOVING PAWS INC — $5,872 · OtherLOVING PAWS …S and H Korn Foundation — $5,872 · OtherS and H Korn…PRICELESS PARROT PRESERVE INC — $5,872 · OtherPRICELESS PA…North Shore Horse Rescue — $5,872 · OtherNorth Shore …Posh Pets Rescue Inc — $22,100 · Recreation & SportsRIVERHEAD SHELTER VOLUNTEER PROGRAM — $20,250 · Arts & Culture
Animals$560,258Other$72,738Recreation & Sports$22,100Arts & Culture$20,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAVE A PET ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $47,872 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetLAST HOPE INC — $45,900 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetTENDER LOVING CATS INC — $37,500 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetALMOST HOME ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC — $33,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetADA HOWE KENT MEMORIAL SHELTER INC — $33,250 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetRUFF HOUSE RESCUE INC — $31,122 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFOR OUR FRIENDS INC — $30,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetPROUD RESCUERS OF PR INC a/k/a Proud Rescuers of Puerto Rico — $30,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetYORKIE911 RESCUE INC — $29,426 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetHOME SWEET HOME ANIMAL RESCUE OF LONG ISLAND INC — $29,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetPIONEERS FOR ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC — $25,872 over 3y, 12% of budgetPosh Pets Rescue Inc — $22,100 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetRIVERHEAD SHELTER VOLUNTEER PROGRAM — $20,250 over 2y, 15% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMARYLLIS FARM EQUINE RESCUE INC — $17,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetPAWS OF WAR INC — $15,872 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetALLEYKATTZ INC — $15,700 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetBILLYS LOVING CATS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetGUARDIANS OF RESCUE INC — $14,872 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPETS4LUV FOUNDATION — $12,622 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetPIT OF OUR SOULS RESCUE INC — $12,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE GINNY FUNDINCORPORATED — $11,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetJAKES RESCUE RANCH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetGive Me Shelter Project Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF LONG ISLAND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLONG BEACH HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetNORTHPORT CAT RESCUE ASSOCIATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetANIMAL LOVERS LEAGUE INC — $6,750 over 1y, 13% of budgetLONG ISLAND CAT KITTEN SOLUTION INC — $6,750 over 1y, 14% of budgetS and H Korn Foundation — $5,872 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetNorth Shore Horse Rescue — $5,872 over 1y, 6.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Petsmart Charities IncThe Duffield Family F…The Richard and Eliza…Paypal Charitable Giv…Alexander M Lewyt and…Greater Good CharitiesAmerican Express Foun…Network for GoodJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…Verizon FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…
Petsmart Charities IncAZ19.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Petsmart Charities Inc · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · The Richard and Elizabeth Boggio Fo · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Alexander M Lewyt and Elisabeth Lewyt Wholly Charitable Trust · Greater Good Charities · American Express Foundation · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pet Peeves Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pet Peeves Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pet Peeves Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines