· Private foundation
The Norwood Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $238k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $693k
- $250k+5 grants · $5.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Rapha Foundation Fund | $2,800,000 |
| Pikes Peak Community Foundations | $1,566,337 |
| Individual grant recipient | $275,000 |
| Advance Colorado | $250,000 |
| American Red Cross | $250,000 |
| QED Foundation | $225,000 |
| Care & Share | $125,000 |
| Baptists on Mission | $100,000 |
| Mt Carmel Veterans Center | $100,000 |
| Dream Centers of Colorado Springs | $92,615 |
| Penrose St Francis Health Foundation | $50,000 |
| First Presbyterian Church | $35,000 |
| St Helena Hospital Foundation | $33,500 |
| Empty Stocking Fund | $30,000 |
| Cheyenne Village | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $598k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
49 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YLYOUNG LIFE6× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +39%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches4× · 2018–2024 · $552k · revenue +9%
- IJINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION4× · 2018–2023 · $475k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- WRWorld Renewone grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue -15%
- CCCS Community Cultural Collectiveone grant, 2022 · $50k
- FFFounds for Hurricane Mariaone grant, 2018 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
The vision of the csfc is to partner with the fire service and supplier partners across the state of colorado in their efforts to protect all of colorado's life and property from fire and other disasters. it is a dynamic organization,…
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
S.e.t. of colorado springs is made up of a small multi-skilled staff and a large corps of volunteers, including many in the medical professions. s.e.t. of colorado springs collaborates with other care-givers in the pikes peak area to teach…
The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
We make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
To build a lasting connection to the pikes peak region by preserving and sharing our cultural history. this mission is accomplished through our support of the colorado springs pioneers museum, owned and operated by the city of colorado…
To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Home Front Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is A Daughters Journey. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH FOUNDATION OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC ↗
- Who funds SIGMA PHI EPSILON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds QED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ADVANCE COLORADO ↗
- Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds World Renew ↗
- Who funds StableStrides ↗
- Who funds THE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DREAM CENTERS OF COLORADO SPRINGS ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUDI'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ULI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Cheyenne Village ↗
- Who funds Pikes Peak Range Riders Foundation ↗
- Who funds St Helena Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds TOUCH OF LOVE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK OR BUST RODEO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Crossfire Ministries Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Ent Credit Union · Pikes Peak United Way · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Daniels Fund · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Norwood Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.