· Private foundation
The Nancy E Barton Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k46 grants · $188k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $154k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $385k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICARES | $55,000 |
| BUILDON | $55,000 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN | $55,000 |
| HARMONY PROJECT | $55,000 |
| TUFTS UNIVERSITY | $55,000 |
| CHILD GUIDANCE CTR OF SOUTHERN CT | $55,000 |
| BOSTON UNIVERSITY | $55,000 |
| THE COLBURN SCHOOL | $29,000 |
| ALL ROADS THEATRE COMPANY | $25,000 |
| HEARTGIFT FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| ACLU AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | $15,000 |
| VS THEATRE COMPANY | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN'S RANCH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM | $10,000 |
| LAKE CHAPALA PERFORMING ARTS COUNCIL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $259k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
77 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Trustees of Tufts College6× · 2020–2025 · $320k · revenue +39%
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY6× · 2020–2025 · $320k · revenue +34%
Save The Children Federation Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $315k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- LALOS ANGELES COUNTY DEVELOPMENTALone grant, 2020 · $4k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $4k
COMMUNITY INITIATIVESone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Deeply rooted in our local beverly hills community and influenced by cultural change, the wallis annenberg center for the performing arts, a public-private partnership with the city of beverly hills, strives to be a site for the…
To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…
The orchestra pursues its mission, "to enrich and connect our community through intimate and transformative musical experiences which exemplify and foster artistic excellence, education and innovation," through the blend of traditional…
Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.
Lookingglass theatre company is a national leader in the creation and presentation of innovative, cutting-edge theatrical work. lookingglass interweaves movement, circus arts and narrative in original and captivating ways. guided by an…
We believe theatre creates an extraordinary connection between artists and audiences that only starts on the stage. theatre creates the energy that feeds a city, a culture, and a society. theatre reflects the community it serves. our…
The latino theater company operates the los angeles theatre center, whose mission is to provide a world class arts center for those pursuing artistic excellence; a laboratory where both tradition and innovation are honored and honed; a…
Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…
A Noise Within produces classic theatre as an essential means to enrich our community by embracing universal human experiences, expanding personal awareness and challenging individual perspectives.
Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.
To celebrate the human experience while encouraging the participation of artist and audience in theatre productions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Create Now Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ensemble Shakespeare Theater. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BUILDON INC ↗
- Who funds Harmony Project ↗
- Who funds HEARTGIFT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE COLBURN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds All Roads Theatre Company ↗
- Who funds Cheshire Moon Incorporated ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER OF SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds Los Angeles Youth Orchestra ↗
- Who funds SKYLIGHT THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ENSEMBLE SHAKESPEARE THEATER ↗
- Who funds JABBERWOCKY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN THEATRE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds YWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR LIVING BEAUTY DBA LIVING BEAUTY CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIRLS IN FOCUS ↗
- Who funds ZEIDERS AMERICAN DREAM THEATER ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VENICE ARTS ↗
- Who funds TWLOHA INC ↗
- Who funds LAUREL HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES MUSIC AND ART SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds EVERYBODY DANCE LA ↗
- Who funds LEGAL MOMENTUM ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Snap Foundation · The Near and Far Association Inc · The Deutsch Foundation · Perenchio Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Green Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Nancy E Barton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Laurel House Inc — 68% of income from government
- Jewish Family Services of Greenwich — 41% of income from government
- Jeanne Geiger Crisis Center Inc — 40% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Homes With Hope — 28% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Metrowest Legal Services Inc — 10% of income from government
- Guerilla Opera Inc — 7% of income from government
- Boston Arts Academy Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Nancy E Barton Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Nancy E Barton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.