Skip to content
The Moxley Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Moxley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$970k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$780kReligion$737kHuman Services$720kFood & Nutrition$550kArts & Culture$425kHealth$333kInternational$325kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $375k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $265k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$20,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Crossroads United Methodist Church$300,000
The University of Texas Foundation$60,000
Western Fairfax Christian Ministries$55,000
John F Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts$50,000
The Cornucopia Institute$50,000
Marine Military Academy$50,000
The Chris Atwood Foundation$40,000
Northern Virginia Family Service$35,000
Water Project Inc$30,000
Doctors Without Borders$30,000
The Trevor Project$25,000
Travis Mills Foundation$25,000
World Central Kitchen Inc$25,000
OrganicEye$20,000
Flint Hill School$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $785k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $40k → 7%Boulder Crest Foundation: $10k → 7%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $40k → 7%Boulder Crest Foundation: $5k → 7%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $40k → 7%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $40k → 7%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $40k → 7%Langley Residential Support Services: $5k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $20k → 7%Third Option Foundation: $10k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $35k → 7%Third Option Foundation: $10k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $35k → 7%Third Option Foundation: $10k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $35k → 7%Third Option Foundation: $10k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $30k → 7%Third Option Foundation: $10k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $30k → 7%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $55k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $25k → 7%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $55k → 6%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $55k → 6%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $35k → 6%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $30k → 6%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $25k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MN
WI
NY
OR
CA
WV
VA
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 28 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
4

Total granted

$3.9M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+39%

Still filing today

93%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationFood & NutritionCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $425k · revenue +160%
  • MM
    MARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +8%
  • WF
    Western Fairfax Christian Ministries
    6× · 2020–2025 · $255k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TA
    Texas A&M University - Kingsville Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +43%
  • FE
    Future Economy Collective
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -63%
  • PU
    PENDER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
5
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
6
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
10
Center for a New American Security Inc

The mission of the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) is to develop strong, pragmatic and principled national security and defense policies building on the the expertise and experience of its staff and advisors. CNAS engages policy…

International
11
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
12
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROSSROADS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $727,000 · OtherCROSSROADS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $160,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCTexas A&M Kingsville Foundation: $80,000 · OtherTexas A&M Kingsville FoundationNational Coalition for the Homeless: $50,000 · OtherTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $145,000 · OtherTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATIONTREVOR PROJECT INC: $120,000 · OtherTREVOR PROJECT INC+11 more: $185,000 · Other+11 moreWestern Fairfax Christian Ministries: $255,000 · Human ServicesWestern Fairfax Chris…MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $220,000 · Human ServicesMARINE CORPS HERITAGE…NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $190,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAM…LANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesLANGLEY RESIDENTIAL S…THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATI…+1 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesMARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC: $300,000 · EducationMARINE MILITAR…Flint Hill School: $220,000 · EducationFlint Hill Sch…Texas A&M University - Kingsville Foundation Inc: $20,000 · EducationJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $425,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN F KENN…THE WATER PROJECT INC: $180,000 · InternationalTHE WATER P…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $95,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $80,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…International Rescue Committee INC: $25,000 · InternationalInternation…AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $25,000 · InternationalAMERICAN NE…THE CORNUCOPIA INSTITUTE INC: $210,000 · Food & NutritionORGANICEYE INC: $80,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CHRIS ATWOOD FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $40,000 · HealthSTOP SOLDIER SUICIDE INC: $27,500 · Health
Other$1,467,000Human Services$785,000Education$540,000Arts & Culture$425,000International$405,000Food & Nutrition$295,000Health$247,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $425,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC: $300,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWestern Fairfax Christian Ministries: $255,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetFlint Hill School: $220,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $220,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CORNUCOPIA INSTITUTE INC: $210,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $190,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC: $180,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHRIS ATWOOD FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $160,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $145,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetORGANICEYE INC: $80,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetLANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNational Coalition for the Homeless: $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBeyond Pesticides: $40,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTOP SOLDIER SUICIDE INC: $27,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTexas A&M University - Kingsville Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFuture Economy Collective: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Dominion Energy Chari…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…
The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia IncVA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Moxley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Moxley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Xerces Society Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moxley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home