· Private foundation
The Morton K and Jane Blaustein Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $365k
- $50k–250k48 grants · $3.8M
- $250k+2 grants · $685k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Accelerate Change | $400,000 |
| Immigrant Justice Corps | $285,000 |
| Equis Institute | $200,000 |
| American Civil Liberties Union Foundation | $150,000 |
| NEO Philanthropy | $150,000 |
| American Civil Liberties Union Foundation | $150,000 |
| Arizona Public Media | $115,000 |
| Native American Rights Fund | $113,500 |
| Ground Game Fund | $100,000 |
| Physicians for Human Rights | $100,000 |
| Ground Game Fund | $100,000 |
| The BrotherhoodSister Sol | $90,000 |
| Inside Climate News | $80,000 |
| International Medical Corps | $80,000 |
| Anera | $80,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
97 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 49 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $755k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IJIMMIGRANT JUSTICE CORPS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +161%
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +102%- ACACCELERATE CHANGE INC5× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +495%
Funded once
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INCone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -54%- COCOLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +62%
- VLVOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.
The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…
Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Middle east investment initiative, inc. (meii) stimulates sustainable economic activity and long-lasting job creation in the middle east and north africa (mena) by designing and deploying finance and technical assistance programs to…
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is B'more Clubhouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
154 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 154 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATE CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds Disability Rights Maryland Inc dba Maryland Disability Law Center Inc ↗
- Who funds West Harlem Environmental Action Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds KIND INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds OUR CLIMATE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP ↗
- Who funds THE SENTENCING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds National Economic and Social Rights Initiative ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM INC ↗
- Who funds Advocates for Children of New York ↗
- Who funds THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC ↗
- Who funds TYPE MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds JEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds INSIDE CLIMATE NEWS INC ↗
- Who funds T'RUAH ↗
- Who funds ENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS ↗
- Who funds ALIGN THE ALLIANCE FOR A GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundation to Promote Open Society · The Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Open Society Institute · Impactassetsinc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Leonard and Helen R Stulman Charitable · Clayton Baker Trust · Greater Washington Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Morton K and Jane Blaustein Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Disability Rights Maryland Inc dba Maryland Disability Law Center Inc — 49% of income from government
- Asylee Women Enterprise Inc — 26% of income from government
- Intersection of Change Inc — 20% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
- Restorative Response Baltimore Inc — 4% of income from government
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Wide Angle Youth Media Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
- Behavorial Health Systems Baltimore — 1% of income from government
- Goucher College — 0% of income from government
- Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc — 0% of income from government
- Silver Hill Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Morton K and Jane Blaustein Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Morton K and Jane Blaustein Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.