Skip to content

Colorado · Nonprofit

GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT

GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT (Colorado) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,854,247 to it, the largest being ROCKEFELLER FAMILY FUND INC ($600,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 59% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$1.3M
Funders on record
18
Grants received
$1.9M
Net assets
$864k
10/18 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 80%
01What it does

What Global Warming Mitigation Project does

Mission

Awarding the keeling curve prize to organizations or individuals who make a substantial impact in efforts to mitigate global warming as it affects the united states and elsewhere.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The keeling curve prize (kcp) recognizes and supports innovative climate solutions that aim to bend the keeling curve downward, ultimately reducing the concentration of atmospheric co2 and other greenhouse gases. Our prize acknowledges projects and initiatives from around the globe that are making significant strides in addressing climate change, promoting sustainability, and advancing decarbonization efforts. By celebrating these advancements, we hope to inspire continued progress in the fight against global warming and encourage the adoption of impactful climate solutions.

    $1,172,986 spentof which $500,000 as grants
    79% of program spending
  2. The constellations fellowship provides students and recent graduates with professional virtual internships within our global network of keeling curve prize laureates and finalists. Through this program we are fostering the next generation of climate leaders by connecting students and recent graduates to professional opportunities within our global network of climate organizations. The constellations fellowship offers 12-14 weeks of 100% remote entry-level career experience in the field. Fellows gain real-life, hands-on professional development and career-building skills.

    $126,600 spent
    9% of program spending
  3. The climate impact conduit is an impact-driven program designed to unlock greater flows of capital to some of the world's best climate solutions. Investors, donors, and corporations can connect with entrepreneurs and nonprofit leaders from around the globe to make meaningful investments that create returns for people, the planet and the bottom line.

    $71,218 spent
    5% of program spending
  4. General programs impacting organizations or individuals who make a substantial impact in efforts to mitigate global warming as it affects the united states and elsewhere.

    $113,587 spent
    8% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,484,391.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($750k) Expenses 100 ($422k) Net assets 100 ($416k)2019 Revenue 81 ($609k) Expenses 128 ($540k) Net assets 117 ($485k)2020 Revenue 167 ($1.3M) Expenses 164 ($691k) Net assets 253 ($1.1M)2021 Revenue 109 ($818k) Expenses 157 ($664k) Net assets 290 ($1.2M)2022 Revenue 140 ($1.1M) Expenses 224 ($946k) Net assets 315 ($1.3M)2023 Revenue 196 ($1.5M) Expenses 366 ($1.5M) Net assets 296 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 169 ($1.3M) Expenses 388 ($1.6M) Net assets 208 ($864k)
2018201920202021202220232024
Revenue (169)Expenses (388)Net assets (208)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $485k to $1.1M (+117%).

$441k
$485k
$1.1M
$1.2M
$1.3M
$1.2M
$864k
2018201920202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

99% of GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$328k
’18
$69k
’19
$565k
’20
$154k
’21
$104k
’22
−$76k
’23
−$368k
’24
6.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jacquelyn Francis

Executive director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

2018201920202021202220232024
Listed2225597
Joined····+0+4+0
No longer listed····002
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 11 funders, grant income rose $50k → $355k.

8 of 18 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 59% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 32% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

59% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT.

32%
largest funder
65%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 50% · 2021 62% · 2022 59% · 2023 28% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

59% of GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $760k that is directly attributable, 65% of it comes from funders outside Colorado, across 5 states.

WA
NY
CO
MD
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT is better cushioned than half of the 2,186 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−29% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve6.3mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,186 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 8%Fundraising 2%

Governance

7
board members
86%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

47%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CO

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT?
GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT (Colorado) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,854,247 to it, the largest being ROCKEFELLER FAMILY FUND INC ($600,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 59% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT have?
IRS filings report 18 organizations giving $1,854,247 in grants to GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT?
ROCKEFELLER FAMILY FUND INC is the largest funder on record, with $600,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 18 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing