· Private foundation
The Meeker Rom Grausz Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k45 grants · $192k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $185k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FORTERRA NW | $35,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES | $30,000 |
| EARTHJUSTICE | $25,000 |
| ALCHEMY ART CENTER | $20,000 |
| LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND | $15,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $15,000 |
| CATHARINE LORILLARD WOLFE ART CLUB INC | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND | $10,000 |
| THE CARL SCHURZ PARK CONSERVANCY INC | $8,000 |
| SAN JUAN ISLANDS MUSEUM OF ART | $7,500 |
| CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC | $7,500 |
| FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC | $7,000 |
| NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LOLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND9× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +353%
- MMMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +76%
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY5× · 2019–2023 · $90k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $20k
Save The Children Federation Incone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -13%- TCTHE CONSERVATION ALLIANCEone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Every Org. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FORTERRA NW ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE GENERATION ↗
- Who funds CATHARINE LORILLARD WOLFE ART CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SAN JUAN ISLAND LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds THE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds ALCHEMY ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES ↗
- Who funds LEGAL VOICE ↗
- Who funds THE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds CARL SCHURZ PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds SAN JUAN COMMUNITY HOME TRUST ↗
- Who funds STANLEY ANN DUNHAM SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RICHARD HUGO HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds SALMAGUNDI CLUB ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY ↗
- Who funds MILLS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNICEF USA Impact Fund for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds Conservation Lands Foundation ↗
- Who funds California Poets in the Schools ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS WILDERNESS ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · San Juan Island Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Artsfund · The Stocker Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Patagoniaorg · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Brooks and Suzanne Ragen Family Foundation · The Mary See Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Meeker Rom Grausz Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Institute for Sustainable Communities — 100% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Meeker Rom Grausz Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Meeker Rom Grausz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.