Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McKelvey Daugherty Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$64kAnimals$49kYouth Development$43kReligion$30kPhilanthropy$25kFood & Nutrition$24kEmployment$12kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,889
Median grant
7
States reached
$634k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREAKAWAY RANCH FOUNDATION$4,834
BTN COMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATION$3,917
HORSES WITH HEART AZ$2,917
EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER FUND$2,917
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$2,917
FOOD FORWARD$2,917
GRAND CANYON YOUTH$2,889
ALS ASSOCIATION$2,445
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST$2,334
LAKEWOOD CHURCH$2,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,458
FATHER JOE'S VILLAGE$1,458
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$1,000
PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUTH HOMES: $4k → 9%JACKS HELPING HAND: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
AZ
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$289k · 21 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
19

Total granted

$289k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+45%

Still filing today

43%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionEnvironmentPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOOD FORWARD INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $27k · revenue +373%
  • GC
    GRAND CANYON YOUTH INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +48%
  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • TW
    TOMMY WALTER MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • YH
    YOUTH HOMES
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue -6%
  • RC
    RESONATE CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
7
The Jmt Wilderness Conservancy

Working to restore the watersheds, wilderness, and wildlife in the high sierra nevada following the john muir trail (est. 1915) for all life in california.

Environment
8
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
9
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
10
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
11
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
12
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Children's Healthcare Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Missoula Church of Christ. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BTN COMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATION: $28,759 · OtherBTN COMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATIONIDAHO YOUTH ADVOCATES: $27,638 · OtherIDAHO YOUTH ADVOCATESEISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER FUND: $24,759 · OtherEISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER FUNDFOREVER HOME ANIMAL RESCUE: $21,050 · OtherFOREVER HOME ANIMAL RESCUEBREAK AWAY RANCH FOUNDATION: $16,168 · OtherBREAK AWAY RANCH FOUNDATIONGOODWILL INDUSTRIES: $12,100 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIESFATHER JOE'S VILLAGE: $8,578 · OtherSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,828 · Other+22 more: $49,722 · Other+22 moreAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $17,350 · HealthAMYOTROPHI…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $12,275 · HealthALZHEIMER'…VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthFOOD FORWARD INC: $27,109 · Food & NutritionFOOD FORW…MIO Frontiers: $12,100 · ReligionST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $7,850 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,834 · ReligionPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $13,275 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,240 · PhilanthropyTHE CDM FOUNDATION: $1,250 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyGRAND CANYON YOUTH INC: $17,867 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $500 · Recreation & SportsHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST INC: $13,266 · Animals
Other$196,602Health$31,125Food & Nutrition$27,109Religion$25,784Philanthropy$19,265Recreation & Sports$18,367Animals$13,266

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FORWARD INC: $27,109 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND CANYON YOUTH INC: $17,867 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $17,350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $13,275 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST INC: $13,266 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $12,275 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMIO Frontiers: $12,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $7,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,828 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,834 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,240 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH HOMES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $1,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACKS HELPING HAND INC: $1,532 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA SURF MUSEUM: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CDM FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMISSOULA CHURCH OF CHRIST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKATHYS LEGACY INC: $700 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $523 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE RIVER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DUNES: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMBOLDT AREA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CANYON YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HOMES ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JACKS HELPING HAND INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA SURF MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE CDM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA CHURCH OF CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds KATHYS LEGACY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McKelvey Daugherty Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McKelvey Daugherty Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McKelvey Daugherty Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph