· Private foundation
The Lb Research and Education Foundation C/O Peter Marks
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k18 grants · $435k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $370k
- $250k+2 grants · $720k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION | $420,000 |
| OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $300,000 |
| HARMONY PROJECT OF LOS ANGELES | $100,000 |
| BLALOCK FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| CATALYST FOR CHANGE | $60,000 |
| THE LIME FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| YOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION | $50,000 |
| OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN | $50,000 |
| CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| HACK THE HOOD | $35,000 |
| UNCOMMON GOOD | $35,000 |
| EMPOWERED NETWORK | $25,000 |
| BAY AREA VIDEO COALITION | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $325k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $295k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +23%
- OSOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +3%
- YMYOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION5× · 2020–2024 · $325k · revenue +74%
Funded once
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue 0%- JBJUSTIN BLALOCK FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $100k
- GSGAYLORD SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE HOSPITALone grant, 2022 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
Ciis is an institution of higher education that encourages an interdisciplinary approach to learning. over 1,700 students are enrolled in masters, doctoral, bachelor of arts completion programs, and certifications. ours is a mosaic of…
Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.
The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…
To advance students' economic and social mobility by improving public education.
10,000 degrees is a leading college success nonprofit in the san francisco bay area. we help students from low-income backgrounds gain access to and complete higher education to positively impact their communities and the world.…
See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…
Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science
Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity House and the most unlike its peers is Each Moment Were Alive Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Blalock Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds FACE FORWARD INC DBA FACE FORWARD INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Hobart Shakespeareans ↗
- Who funds Mendocino Arts Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NICHOLAS CENTER LTD ↗
- Who funds Lime Foundation ↗
- Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CHAINLESS CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds UNCOMMON GOOD ↗
- Who funds BENJAMIN FRANKLIN CUMMINGS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds AHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hack the Hood Inc ↗
- Who funds CATALYST FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds AIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE ↗
- Who funds The Bay Area Video Coalition Incorporated ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH ↗
- Who funds AVALON-CARVER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR BETTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF LITERACY ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER HER NETWORK INC DBA EMPOWERED NETWORK ↗
- Who funds South Carolina Aquarium ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Lb Research and Education Foundation C/O Peter Marks funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Empower Her Network Inc Dba Empowered Network — 47% of income from government
- Central Oregon Veterans Ranch — 45% of income from government
- Aha Foundation Inc — 42% of income from government
- Ophelia's Place — 22% of income from government
- Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology — 5% of income from government
- Chainless Change Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.