Skip to content
The Kaylor Yetto Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Kaylor Yetto Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$308k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$322kHealth$314kAnimals$46kInternational$37kRecreation & Sports$23kYouth Development$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kHuman Services$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $254k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENDONOMA HEALTH ALLIANCE$150,000
PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$103,814
NORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$10,000
WASATCH IMMIGRATION PROJECT$5,295
WATER FOR SOUTH SUDAN$5,000
NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER$5,000
GLAAD INC$5,000
THE CATIE HOCH FOUNDATION$4,000
THE COASTAL KIDS FOUNDATION$2,000
INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE$1,090
ALS NETWORK$1,020
REDWOOD COAST CHAMBER FOUNDATION$1,000
LOVE AND SECOND CHANCES$1,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUCKY PROJECT: $5k → 8%NORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%LUCKY PROJECT: $530 → 8%NORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%NORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%Norcal Spinal Cod Injury Foundation: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
UT
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$257k · 15 repeat orgs$254k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
18

Total granted

$257k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

80%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalAnimalsArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $71k · revenue +13%
  • NS
    NORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +39%
  • WF
    Water for South Sudan Inc
    3× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • REDWOOD COAST MEDICAL SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -4%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +8%
  • CW
    Canines With a Causegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
2
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
3
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
4
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
7
Cancer Prevention Institute of California (Cpic)

As the nation's premier organization, CPIC was dedicated to preventing cancer and reducing its burden where it cannot yet be prevented. CPIC's innovative cancer prevention research and outreach programs were delivering a comprehensive…

—
8
Sundance Institute

Sundance institute is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the discovery and development of independent artists and audiences.

Arts & Culture
9
Womens Cancer Resource Center

The Womens Cancer Resource Center improves equitable access to cancer information, support and care.

Unclassified
10
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ability Center; the most unlike its peers is Pole Mountain Lookout Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
19/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $302,814 · PhilanthropyPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCATIE HOCH FOUNDATION: $19,000 · PhilanthropyCATIE HOCH FOUNDATION+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyMENDONOMA HEALTH ALLIANCE: $150,000 · HealthMENDONOMA HEALTH ALLIANCEALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $71,200 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISO…REDWOOD COAST MEDICAL SERVICES INC: $20,000 · HealthREDWOOD COAST MEDICAL SERVICES INC+4 more: $3,833 · HealthSMILE TRAIN INC: $20,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN I…C.A.R.E.: $11,000 · OtherC.A.R.E.LIVE PC GIVE PC: $10,381 · OtherLIVE PC GIVE …SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC: $5,000 · OtherGLAAD INC: $5,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $3,500 · OtherGualala Arts Inc: $10,000 · OtherGualala Arts …SONOMA VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherSONOMA VOLUNT…Wasatch Immigration Project: $5,295 · OtherWasatch Immig…MOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Other+12 more: $10,805 · Other+12 moreLOVE AND SECOND CHANCES: $13,500 · AnimalsPEPPERTREE RESCUE INC: $11,500 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $11,000 · AnimalsCanines With a Cause: $10,000 · AnimalsNORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Human ServicesLucky Project: $5,530 · Human ServicesWater for South Sudan Inc: $30,000 · InternationalGIRLS GARAGE: $10,000 · International+2 more: $1,515 · InternationalNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $17,530 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$322,814Health$245,033Other$94,981Animals$46,000Human Services$45,530International$41,515Recreation & Sports$17,530

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $302,814 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMENDONOMA HEALTH ALLIANCE: $150,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $71,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetWater for South Sudan Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetREDWOOD COAST MEDICAL SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATIE HOCH FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $17,530 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE AND SECOND CHANCES: $13,500 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetPEPPERTREE RESCUE INC: $11,500 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCanines With a Cause: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetGIRLS GARAGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSONOMA VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetGualala Arts Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLucky Project: $5,530 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLAAD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALS Network: $1,520 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $1,090 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $1,015 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetQUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRedwood Coast Chamber Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKimball Art Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $765 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPole Mountain Lookout Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRIVERSIDE CITY FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOC INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN UTAH: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Park City Community F…Mightycause Charitabl…Sonoma County Communi…McKesson Foundation I…Silicon Valley Commun…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…
Park City Community FoundationUT19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Park City Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kaylor Yetto Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kaylor Yetto Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kaylor Yetto Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home