· Private foundation
The Kaylor Yetto Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $254k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MENDONOMA HEALTH ALLIANCE | $150,000 |
| PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $103,814 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| NORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| WASATCH IMMIGRATION PROJECT | $5,295 |
| WATER FOR SOUTH SUDAN | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER | $5,000 |
| GLAAD INC | $5,000 |
| THE CATIE HOCH FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| THE COASTAL KIDS FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE | $1,090 |
| ALS NETWORK | $1,020 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER | $1,000 |
| QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| REDWOOD COAST CHAMBER FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $71k · revenue +13%
- NSNORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +39%
- WFWater for South Sudan Inc3× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +25%
Funded once
SMILE TRAIN INCone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +8%
REDWOOD COAST MEDICAL SERVICES INCone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -4%- CC.A.R.E.one grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.
As the nation's premier organization, CPIC was dedicated to preventing cancer and reducing its burden where it cannot yet be prevented. CPIC's innovative cancer prevention research and outreach programs were delivering a comprehensive…
Sundance institute is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the discovery and development of independent artists and audiences.
The Womens Cancer Resource Center improves equitable access to cancer information, support and care.
Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ability Center and the most unlike its peers is Pole Mountain Lookout Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MENDONOMA HEALTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Water for South Sudan Inc ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds REDWOOD COAST MEDICAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CATIE HOCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LOVE AND SECOND CHANCES ↗
- Who funds PEPPERTREE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Gualala Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds SONOMA VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Canines With a Cause ↗
- Who funds GIRLS GARAGE ↗
- Who funds Lucky Project ↗
- Who funds Wasatch Immigration Project ↗
- Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC ↗
- Who funds GLAAD INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALS Network ↗
- Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds Redwood Coast Chamber Foundation ↗
- Who funds Kimball Art Center ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUE WEST FILM CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Park City Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Kaylor Yetto Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.