· Private foundation
The Jacquemin Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $65k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $568k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Pennsylvania State University | $100,000 |
| University at Buffalo Foundation In | $75,000 |
| Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Cent | $50,000 |
| Child Care Learning Center of Rappa | $30,000 |
| Kenya Education Fund KEF | $30,000 |
| Rappahannock Pantry | $30,000 |
| Foothills Forum | $25,000 |
| Health Tree Foundation | $25,000 |
| Solar Community Housing Association | $25,000 |
| Kid Pan Alley | $25,000 |
| Raap Center for Education | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| International Myeloma Foundation | $20,000 |
| Multiple Myeloma Research Foundatio | $20,000 |
| Acclerated Cure Project | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $505k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 13% of The Jacquemin Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in VA; read by stated purpose it is 49% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
107 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 63 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC7× · 2017–2023 · $140k · revenue +23%
- BBBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC6× · 2017–2022 · $120k · revenue +249%
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION7× · 2017–2024 · $106k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- TSTuck School of Businessone grant, 2019 · $60k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $30k
- ARArtist Relief via United States Artone grant, 2020 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.
Moveable feast's mission is to improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and…
Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.
Amplify the work of our community by bringing people and resources together.
Trade association for electric cooperatives
To advocate for domestic violence victims, at-risk children, and other vulnerable individuals by providing over $22.8m in pro bono legal services, social service referrals, and on-going support; to train and support a strong network of…
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.
Advocate for and support abused and neglected children to ensure their right to safe, stable and permanent homes.
The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Distress Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rappahannock Animal Welfare League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Kid Pan Alley ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds FOOTHILLS FORUM ↗
- Who funds ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds Homestretch Inc ↗
- Who funds CHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University at Buffalo Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATED CURE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE ART LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds THE BOSTON HOME INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MAIN STREET CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOLAR COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds INSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds RAPP AT HOME ↗
- Who funds NorCal Resist ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of the National Capital Area · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Northern Piedmont Community Foundation · Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The William and Mary Greve Foundation Inc · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jacquemin Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Boston Home Inc — 45% of income from government
- Kids in Distress Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.