Skip to content
The Jacquemin Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Jacquemin Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$858k
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.0MHealth$1.0MArts & Culture$961kHousing & Shelter$436kFood & Nutrition$271kCrime & Legal$249kYouth Development$237kHuman Services$220kOther$0
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $568k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pennsylvania State University$100,000
University at Buffalo Foundation In$75,000
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Cent$50,000
Rappahannock Pantry$30,000
Child Care Learning Center of Rappa$30,000
Kenya Education Fund KEF$30,000
Kid Pan Alley$25,000
Raap Center for Education$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Foothills Forum$25,000
Solar Community Housing Association$25,000
Health Tree Foundation$25,000
Multiple Myeloma Research Foundatio$20,000
International Myeloma Foundation$20,000
Acclerated Cure Project$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $505k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Kids in Distress: $10k → 13%Homestretch: $15k → 4%Kids in Distress: $10k → 13%Homestretch: $15k → 4%Kids in Distress: $10k → 13%Homestretch: $15k → 4%Homestretch: $15k → 4%Homeless Children's Playtime Projec: $5k → 14%Homestretch: $15k → 4%Homestretch: $10k → 4%Homestretch: $8k → 4%Miriam's Kitchen: $5k → 14%Homestretch: $8k → 4%ALIVE: $10k → 9%Miriam's Kitchen: $5k → 14%ALIVE: $10k → 9%Miriam's Kitchen: $5k → 14%ALIVE: $10k → 9%Miriam's Kitchen: $5k → 14%ALIVE: $5k → 9%Sexual Minority Youth Assistance Le: $8k → 14%Sexual Minority Youth Assistance Le: $8k → 14%Reach Incorporated: $5k → 14%Second Story: $20k → 6%Reach Incorporated: $5k → 14%Second Story: $15k → 6%Reach Incorporated: $5k → 14%Second Story: $15k → 6%Serendipity Equine Inc: $5k → 10%Sexual Minority Youth Assistance Le: $5k → 14%Second Story: $15k → 6%Serendipty Equine Inc: $5k → 10%Reach Incorporated: $5k → 14%Second Story: $15k → 6%Serendipity Equine Inc: $5k → 10%Serendipity Equine Inc: $5k → 10%Second Story: $15k → 6%Serendipity Equine Inc: $5k → 10%Second Story: $10k → 6%Main Street Child Development Cente: $10k → 6%Main Street Child Development Cente: $10k → 6%Main Street Child Development Cente: $10k → 6%Main Street Child Development Cente: $5k → 6%Rappahannock Benevolent Fund: $20k → 10%Rapp at Home: $10k → 10%Rapp at Home: $10k → 10%Rapp at Home: $10k → 10%Rapp at Home: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
NV
SD
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of The Jacquemin Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 49%.

The Jacquemin Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 107 repeat orgs$465k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

107 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2024, 63 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

107
29

Total granted

$5.7M
$270k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+29%

Still filing today

64%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $140k · revenue +23%
  • BB
    BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $120k · revenue +249%
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $106k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • TS
    Tuck School of Business
    one grant, 2019 · $60k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • AR
    Artist Relief via United States Art
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
4
Moveable Feast Inc

Moveable feast's mission is to improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and…

—
5
Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition
6
Act for Alexandria

Amplify the work of our community by bringing people and resources together.

Community Improvement
7
Virginia Maryland and Delaware Association of Electric Cooperatives

Trade association for electric cooperatives

—
8
Volunteer Legal Advocates

To advocate for domestic violence victims, at-risk children, and other vulnerable individuals by providing over $22.8m in pro bono legal services, social service referrals, and on-going support; to train and support a strong network of…

Housing & Shelter
9
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
10
The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services
11
Anne Arundel County Casa Inc

Advocate for and support abused and neglected children to ensure their right to safe, stable and permanent homes.

Civil Rights
12
Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Distress Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rappahannock Animal Welfare League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/90
Grantees still filing
67/90
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

George Mason University: $626,000 · OtherGeorge Mason UniversityGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $291,325 · OtherGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITYPublic Education Foundation Penn Di: $250,000 · OtherPublic Education Foundation Penn DiKenya Education Fund KEF: $215,000 · OtherUniversity at Buffalo BNAC: $182,000 · OtherSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Cent: $150,000 · OtherChild Care Learning Center of Rappa: $141,000 · Other+80 more: $2,181,290 · Other+80 moreKid Pan Alley: $147,000 · Arts & CultureKid Pan Al…SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $106,300 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIA…FOOTHILLS FORUM: $105,000 · Arts & CultureFOOTHILLS …THE ART LEAGUE: $65,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ART LE…LEVINE MUSIC INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureLEVINE MUS…ARTSTREAM INC: $36,000 · Arts & CultureARTSTREAM …WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCASTLETON FESTIVAL: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $25,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC: $140,000 · HealthFRIENDS O…ACCELERATED CURE PROJECT INC: $70,000 · HealthACCELERAT…THE BOSTON HOME INC: $55,000 · HealthTHE BOSTO…INSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER: $47,500 · HealthINSIGHT M…BAILEY'S CROSSROADS HEALTH ACCESS PARTNE: $42,500 · HealthBAILEY'S …MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $40,000 · HealthMULTIPLE …MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY INC: $37,500 · HealthMENTAL HE…GENDER HEALTH CENTER: $37,500 · HealthGENDER HE…CULPEPER WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · HealthCULPEPER …NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH: $25,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesABUSED AN…Homestretch Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesHomestret…MAIN STREET CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $50,000 · Human ServicesMAIN STRE…RAPP AT HOME: $47,000 · Human ServicesRAPP AT H…ALIVE Inc: $35,000 · Human ServicesALIVE IncKIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesKIDS IN D…SERENDIPITY EQUINE INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesSERENDIPI…GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $20,000 · Human ServicesSMYAL Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesRAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesREACH EDUCATION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesMIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $20,000 · Human Services+3 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesRAPPAHANNOCK PANTRY INC: $74,000 · Food & NutritionCommon Good City Farm: $37,500 · Food & NutritionVEGAN OUTREACH INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $20,330 · Food & NutritionARCADIA FOOD INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionALLEGHENY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $12,500 · Food & NutritionKISS THE GROUND: $8,000 · Food & NutritionUniversity at Buffalo Foundation Inc: $75,000 · EducationFAMILY FUTURES: $40,000 · EducationRAPPU INC: $37,500 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationSOLAR COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterRAPPAHANNOCK COMMUNITIES: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterDISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterCROSSWAY COMMUNITY INC: $21,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more: $7,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$4,036,615Arts & Culture$564,300Health$537,500Human Services$514,500Food & Nutrition$212,330Education$177,500Housing & Shelter$158,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKid Pan Alley: $147,000 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC: $140,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $106,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $105,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetFOOTHILLS FORUM: $105,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetHomestretch Inc: $100,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC: $80,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity at Buffalo Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK PANTRY INC: $74,000 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $70,965 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetACCELERATED CURE PROJECT INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ART LEAGUE: $65,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE BOSTON HOME INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOLAR COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetMAIN STREET CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $50,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK COMMUNITIES: $50,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER: $47,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRAPP AT HOME: $47,000 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetNorCal Resist: $45,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC: $42,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBAILEY'S CROSSROADS HEALTH ACCESS PARTNE: $42,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLEVINE MUSIC INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY FUTURES: $40,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY INC: $37,500 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetGENDER HEALTH CENTER: $37,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCULPEPER WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRAPPU INC: $37,500 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetCommon Good City Farm: $37,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetARTSTREAM INC: $36,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetALIVE Inc: $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSANGO-KENYA INC: $32,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $31,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $30,250 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVEGAN OUTREACH INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetThe Arc of Northern Virginia: $30,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetKIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOPECAM INC: $28,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCastleton Community Volunteer Fire Company: $27,500 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetSERENDIPITY EQUINE INC: $27,500 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $23,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSWAY COMMUNITY INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Kid Pan Alley ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS FORUM ↗
  • Who funds Homestretch Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University at Buffalo Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ACCELERATED CURE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOSTON HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLAR COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds INSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RAPP AT HOME ↗
  • Who funds NorCal Resist ↗
  • Who funds ARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Nat…Greater Washington Co…The Morris and Gwendo…Northern Piedmont Com…Fauquier Health Found…Clark-Winchcole Found…Mightycause Charitabl…The Community Foundat…John Edward Fowler Me…Philip L Graham Fund …The William and Mary …Dimick Foundation Joh…
United Way of the National Capital AreaVA38.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the National Capital Area · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Northern Piedmont Community Foundation · Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The William and Mary Greve Foundation Inc · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jacquemin Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jacquemin Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • The Boston Home Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Kids in Distress Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
38report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jacquemin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home