· Public charity
The Institute for Intergovernmental Research Inc
Iir's mission is to respond to the needs of criminal justice agencies across the country through the administration of grant funded programs that have a positive impact on local, state, federal, tribal, and territorial law enforcement and criminal justice agencies.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of THE INSTITUTE FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $372k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+1 grant · $2.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTEGRATED JUSTICE INFORMATION STSTEMS INSTITUTE INC | $2,535,775 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK | $185,603 |
| UNIVEERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA | $168,183 |
| NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC | $160,541 |
| RULO STRATEGIES | $131,776 |
| INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE INCORPORATED | $130,822 |
| HAMILTON COUNTY OH | $113,188 |
| NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF BLACK LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVES | $106,798 |
| SANTA FE COUNTY | $104,183 |
| ADVOCATES FOR HUMAN POTENTIAL | $91,790 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $89,661 |
| FELLOWSHIP HOUSE INC | $80,566 |
| HARNETT COUNTY | $74,986 |
| CITY OF LUBBOCK | $73,392 |
| STEVENS COUNTY DBA NORTHEAST WASHINGTON ALLIANCE COUNSELING SERVICES | $62,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $414k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 20% of The Institute for Intergovernmental Research Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
79 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $383k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPORTER-STARKE SERVICES INC2× · 2022–2023 · $640k · revenue +23%
- PHPrisma Health-Upstate2× · 2022–2023 · $480k · revenue +22%
- SMST MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER2× · 2022–2023 · $374k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- COCITY OF PORTSMOUTHone grant, 2023 · $531k
- EDEBCI DIVISION OF COMMERCEone grant, 2023 · $474k
- TNTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF COMMUNITY VIOLENCEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $388k · revenue +54%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…
The association actively researches, monitors, and supports legislation designed to increase the effectiveness or narcotic enforrcement
The national association of state workforce agencies (naswa) mission is to enhance the state workforce agencies' ability to accomplish their goals, statutory roles and responsibilities.
Advancing a national community to foster equity in dual and concurrent enrollment through accreditation, advocacy, research, and professional development.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Prim&r advances the highest ethical standards in the conduct of biomedical, behavioral and social science research. prim&r accomplishes this mission through education, membership services, professional certification, public policy…
To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.
The National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) is organized to reflect and advocate for the collective interest of state mental health authorities and their directors at the national level. NASMHPD analyzes…
Search is dedicated to improving the quality of justice and public safety through the use, management, and exchange of information, application of new technologies, and responsible law and policy, while safeguarding security and privacy.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Policing Institute and the most unlike its peers is Coastlands Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Integrated Justice Information Systems Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds PORTER-STARKE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Prisma Health-Upstate ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF COMMUNITY VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE ↗
- Who funds WESTCARE TENNESSEE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF BLACK LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVES ↗
- Who funds National District Attorneys Association ↗
- Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS RURAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds SMA HEALTHCARE INC ↗
- Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MSTEPP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Center for Technology and Civic Life · Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · American Public Health Association · American Bar Association · National Environmental Health Association · National Recreation and Park Association · North American Association of Central Cancer Registries · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · Investor Protection Trust · Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs · Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Institute for Intergovernmental Research Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Sma Healthcare Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.