Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hunt Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
144
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$3.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Education$21MCommunity Improvement$9.0MSocial Science$3.6MArts & Culture$3.0MHealth$2.4MHuman Services$2.0MPublic Benefit$1.9MPhilanthropy$1.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 144 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k52 grants · $179k
  • $10k–50k47 grants · $954k
  • $50k–250k39 grants · $4.3M
  • $250k+6 grants · $7.0M
$20,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$52k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO$3,200,000
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC$2,250,000
NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$500,000
THE EPC MUSEUM$500,000
SW FOUNDATION FOR OSTEOPATHIC ED RES$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO$200,000
PASO DEL NORTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$200,000
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE$200,000
UNIV OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CTR$200,000
CREEED FOUNDATION$187,500
CREEED FOUNDATION$187,500
WESTERN RESOURCE ADVOCATES$150,000
TEXAS 2036$150,000
CREEED$130,353
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $478k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FII-NATIONAL: $100k → 10%THINK NEW MEXICO: $3k → 12%LATINO ACTION FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%THINK NEW MEXICO: $2k → 12%FII-NATIONAL: $100k → 10%THINK NEW MEXICO: $2k → 12%FII-NATIONAL: $100k → 10%THINK NEW MEXICO: $3k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $3k → 12%PROJECT AMISTAD: $5k → 21%PROJECT AMISTAD: $3k → 21%EL PASO CIVIC EDUCATION ORGANIZATION: $75k → 21%PROJECT AMISTAD: $3k → 21%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $25k → 21%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $25k → 21%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
ID
MT
MN
IL
NY
WY
IN
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
NM
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of The Hunt Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 80% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Hunt Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$46M · 114 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

114 repeat relationships — 71 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

114
40

Total granted

$46M
$715k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
0%

Still filing today

80%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10M · revenue +14%
  • NM
    New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +148%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +193%

Funded once

  • CE
    COMMUNITY EN ACCION
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -66% · 50% of their budget
  • BB
    BORDERPLEX BI-NATIONAL ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION FKA EL PASO REGgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $135k · revenue +47% · 54% of their budget
  • CG
    Claremont Graduate University
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Borderplex Bi-National Economic Alliance

To recruit new industry and facilitate the retention and expansion of new jobs and capital investment in the greater el paso, las cruces and juarez region.

Community Improvement
2
El Paso Chamber of Commerce Foundation

The el paso chamber exists to operate exclusively for charitable, educational, scientific, and literary purposes relating to the city of el paso. the chamber foundation serves as its supporting organization to pursue grants to fund…

—
3
El Paso Community Action Program Project Bravo Inc

Our mission:project bravo builds bridges to opportunities that help individuals and families thrive in our community.

Community Improvement
4
El Paso Leadership Academy

The mission of El Paso Leadership Academy is to prepare its students to obtain a four year college degree and to become engaged leaders in their community.

Education
5
El Paso Museum of Art Foundation

To create a permanent endowment fund to support the el paso museum of art. a portion of the capital appreciation and earnings are distributed annually to the el paso museum of art and used for acquisitions, conservation and preservation,…

Arts & Culture
6
El Paso Chamber of Commerce

The mission of el paso chamber of commerce is to support business and our community by providing opportunities for connecting, coaching, advocating, and innovating.

—
7
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
8
Paso Del Norte Health Information Exchange

Paso del Norte Health Information Exchange exists to promote the health of El Paso County and surrounding communities by facilitating the creation and operation of a health information exchange. The central activity of the organization is…

Health
9
El Paso Community College Foundation

The foundation was formed to receive gifts and to invest, manage and distribute such gifts for the benefit of the el paso community college and its students. the foundation promotes education and other related activities of the college.

Education
10
El Paso Education Initiative Inc

The purpose of the organization is to develop and facilitate the implementation of goals and programs that will enhance educational opportunities.

Education
11
El Paso Symphony Foundation

El paso symphony foundation is a separate corporation which provides the el paso symphony orchestra association with charitable and educational support.

—
12
Council On Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation

Lead efforts to identify and support initiatives that improve college readiness and ensure more students graduate with a college degree or certification. partner with education leaders, funders, and regional, state, and national…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community En Accion and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsLocal History MuseumsCommunity College Foundatio…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Women & Girls Leadership De…Health Access Advocacy and …Animal Rescue and ShelterPolicy Research and AdvocacySchool Parent OrganizationsYouth Sports ProgramsElementary Literacy TutoringUnited Way AffiliatesCancer Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Dance Arts OrganizationsDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity Food PantriesJewish Community Organizati…Youth Development CentersCommunity Arts CentersIndependent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Environmental Conservation …School District FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Community FoundationsFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%2%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr10%18%35–55yr13%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%9%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr10%7%35–55yr13%44%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/147
the rest of the field
15%
20,231/136,657

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

136 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 136 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
131/136
Grantees still filing
96/136
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO — $10,033,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASOCOUNCIL OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC EXPANSION AND EDUCATION — $2,864,942 · OtherCOUNCIL OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC EXPANSION AND EDUCATIONCREEED FOUNDATION — $2,079,573 · OtherCREEED FOUNDATIONCOUNCIL OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC EXPANSION AND EDUCATI — $1,849,020 · OtherCOUNCIL OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC EXPANSION AND EDUCATICREEED — $1,733,561 · OtherCREEEDUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN — $1,687,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINUNIV OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CTR — $1,060,000 · Other+96 more — $6,960,503 · Other+96 moreTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $10,065,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INCNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc — $2,575,000 · EducationNew Mexico State Univ Fdn IncSW FOUNDATION FOR OSTEOPATHIC — $550,000 · Education+21 more — $1,645,563 · Education+21 moreTHE EPC MUSEUM DBA LA NUBE — $1,675,000 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS — $139,500 · Arts & CultureKIDS EXCEL EL PASO INC — $100,000 · Arts & Culture+16 more — $310,050 · Arts & CultureTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $1,355,000 · Social Science+1 more — $25,000 · Social SciencePaso del Norte Community Foundation — $744,720 · HealthMAYO CLINIC — $300,000 · HealthMEDICAL CENTER OF THE AMERICAS FOUNDATION — $150,000 · HealthASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $79,800 · Health+10 more — $96,500 · HealthTexas 2036 — $725,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN BUSINESS IMMIGRATION COALITION — $306,315 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE — $165,000 · Public BenefitEL PASO MATTERS INC — $80,000 · Public Benefit+2 more — $20,000 · Public BenefitEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $525,393 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF EL PASO COUNTY — $161,227 · PhilanthropyTEXAS STATE HISTORY MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $80,000 · PhilanthropyTexas Cultural Trust Council — $58,700 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE — $30,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $8,500 · Philanthropy
Other$28,268,099Education$14,835,563Arts & Culture$2,224,550Social Science$1,380,000Health$1,371,020Public Benefit$1,296,315Philanthropy$863,820

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $10,065,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc — $2,575,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetTHE EPC MUSEUM DBA LA NUBE — $1,675,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $1,355,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPaso del Norte Community Foundation — $744,720 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTexas 2036 — $725,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER — $722,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSW FOUNDATION FOR OSTEOPATHIC — $550,000 over 4y, 55% of budgetEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $525,393 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetWestern Resource Advocates — $462,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetEl Paso Zoological Society — $320,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetLydia Patterson Institute — $319,778 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetAMERICAN BUSINESS IMMIGRATION COALITION — $306,315 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC — $300,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFII - NATIONAL — $300,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYSLETA EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $226,161 over 3y, 32% of budgetFoundation for a Globally Competitive Texas — $218,685 over 2y, 87% of budgetCOMMUNITY EN ACCION — $200,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetEl Paso Civic Education Organization — $195,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetPROJECT ARRIBA — $190,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetEl Paso Museum of History Foundation — $181,177 over 5y, 46% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $165,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EL PASO COUNTY — $161,227 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetST PAUL'S SCHOOL — $160,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL CENTER OF THE AMERICAS FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetEL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER — $150,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS — $139,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBORDERPLEX BI-NATIONAL ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION FKA EL PASO REG — $135,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetCOMPASS FOR LIFELONG DISCOVERY — $103,420 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — $103,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS EXCEL EL PASO INC — $100,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetEL PASO BORDER YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC — $95,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetTEXAS STATE HISTORY MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetEL PASO MATTERS INC — $80,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetYucca Council Boy Scouts of America — $80,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $79,800 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetChildren At Risk — $79,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCREATIVE KIDS INC — $75,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetClaremont Graduate University — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC — $70,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetEL PASO BRIDGES ACADEMY — $61,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetWOMEN'S PUBLIC LEADERSHIP NETWORK — $60,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTHE BRIDGE OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO — $60,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetTexas Cultural Trust Council — $58,700 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetThe Opera Company Inc — $58,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE EPC MUSEUM DBA LA NUBE ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Paso del Norte Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Texas 2036 ↗
  • Who funds EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds SW FOUNDATION FOR OSTEOPATHIC ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Western Resource Advocates ↗
  • Who funds El Paso Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds Lydia Patterson Institute ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BUSINESS IMMIGRATION COALITION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TRIBUNE INC ↗
  • Who funds FII - NATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds YSLETA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for a Globally Competitive Texas ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY EN ACCION ↗
  • Who funds El Paso Civic Education Organization ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ARRIBA ↗
  • Who funds El Paso Museum of History Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF EL PASO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ST PAUL'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL CENTER OF THE AMERICAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paso del Norte Commun…El Paso Community Fou…Hervey FoundationThe Electric Company …Robert E & Evelyn McK…Paul L Foster Family …United Way of El Paso…Gecu FoundationWilma Donohue Moleen …Paso del Norte Health…Feinberg FoundationThe Shiloff Family Fo…
Paso del Norte Community FoundationTX94.5× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paso del Norte Community Foundation · El Paso Community Foundation · Hervey Foundation · The Electric Company Charitable Foundation · Robert E & Evelyn McKee Foundation · Paul L Foster Family Foundation · United Way of El Paso County · Gecu Foundation · Wilma Donohue Moleen Foundation Xxxxx7003 · Paso del Norte Health Foundation · Feinberg Foundation · The Shiloff Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hunt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hunt Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hunt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 176 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home