· Public charity
United Way of El Paso County
To improve the lives of el paso families through the caring power of our community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 21 grants below total $845,837 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,268,265 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $422,428 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $388k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $444k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROJECT VIDA | $120,099 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF EL PASO | $58,327 |
| CHILD CRISIS CENTER OF EL PASO | $56,109 |
| CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF EL PASO | $53,885 |
| FAMILY SERVICES OF EL PASO | $52,609 |
| YWCA EL PASO DEL NORTE REGION | $52,112 |
| EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN | $50,567 |
| CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE | $49,780 |
| EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER FOOD BANK | $47,071 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EL PASO | $37,711 |
| COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES | $37,567 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA YUCCA COUNCIL | $35,993 |
| PASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $34,916 |
| CREATIVE KIDS | $30,120 |
| OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS | $27,588 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of United Way of El Paso County’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 90% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PVPROJECT VIDA9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +155%
- YWYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION EL PASO DEL NORTE REGION9× · 2017–2025 · $802k · revenue +75%
- EPEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER9× · 2017–2025 · $617k · revenue ×14
Funded once
- EPEL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +90%
- VNVETERANS NON PROFITone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -35%
- KCKelly Center for Hunger Reliefgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +86%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The coalition is designated as the lead entity by hud for dozens of agencies and indivduals who provide housing, services, and support to the homeless community in el paso and carries out the responsibility of leading and managing the…
To provide compassionate, coordinated, family-centered care for children with a dedicated commitment to excellent patient outcomes, inclusive leadership and innovative pediatric research and education.
El paso human services, inc. (ephsi), a private non-profit multi-purpose organization, has been providing social services in el paso county since 1984. ephsi has extensive experience in developing, implementing and executing federal, state…
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
Counseling Services offering hope, healing, and restoration to hurting people, marriages, and families using respected therapy practices and solid biblical principles.
Engage in the highest quality independent production, publication and or distribution of orginial news and or news-based materials of community value to far west texas, southern new mexico and northern chihuahua, mexico.
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
To provide services, support, and education to all who experience the effects of family dysfunction and/or violence, past and present.
The organization provides breast and cervical cancer screening, case management for diagnosed cancer patients, and community education on cancer to low income women that fall under the 200% poverty level and women over 50 that do not have…
The el paso chamber exists to operate exclusively for charitable, educational, scientific, and literary purposes relating to the city of el paso. the chamber foundation serves as its supporting organization to pursue grants to fund…
The prevention of suffering, neglect, abuse, and cruelty of animalsby providing information, raising public awareness of animal issues,and promoting responsible pet ownership and kindness to all livingthings in west texas.
The mission of the el paso collaborative is to facilitate affordable housing and small business and economic development in el paso and contiguous counties. the collaborative implements its mission by providing loan products and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Paso Center for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tech Frontier Fab Lab El Paso. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROJECT VIDA ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION EL PASO DEL NORTE REGION ↗
- Who funds EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Child Crisis Center of El Paso Inc ↗
- Who funds EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF EL PASO ↗
- Who funds CASA OF EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds PASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds Yucca Council Boy Scouts of America ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COUNSELING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN MIGRANT & REFUGEE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds REYNOLDS HOUSE NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE DESERT SOUTHWEST SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO & WEST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS EXCEL EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE DESERT SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAS BEST CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds EL PASO VILLA MARIA INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EP ↗
- Who funds EL PASO DIABETES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds TECH FRONTIER FAB LAB EL PASO ↗
- Who funds CENTRO SAN VICENTE ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS GRIEF CENTER OF EL PASO ↗
- Who funds Place of Purpose Inc ↗
- Who funds ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE CHILDREN OF EL PASO ↗
- Who funds CANDLELIGHTERS OF THE EL PASO AREA ↗
- Who funds LOCAL INDEPENDENT CHARITIES OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds El Paso Childrens Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF EL PASO AND LAS CRUCES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: El Paso Community Foundation · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · The Hunt Family Foundation · Paso del Norte Health Foundation · The Electric Company Charitable Foundation · Hervey Foundation · Wilma Donohue Moleen Foundation Xxxxx7003 · Gecu Foundation · Robert E & Evelyn McKee Foundation · Sue Smith Harrison Family Foundation · The Shiloff Family Foundation · Cesle C & Mamie F Dues Foundation Xxxxx4003
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of El Paso County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.