Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Paso del Norte Health Foundation

The mission of the Paso del Norte Health Foundation is to lead, leverage, and invest in initiatives, programs, and policies that promote health and prevent disease in the Paso del Norte region.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$18MHealth$16MHuman Services$8.9MPhilanthropy$6.8MFood & Nutrition$6.4MYouth Development$4.6MCivil Rights$1.4MCommunity Improvement$1.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 46 grants below total $11,437,225 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $13,450,044 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,012,819 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $414k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $3.3M
  • $250k+8 grants · $7.7M
$120,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$305M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
El Paso Diabetes Association Inc$2,363,917
Texas Tech Foundation Inc$1,751,163
The University of Texas at El Paso$1,469,555
Paso del Norte Community Foundation$552,241
La Semilla Food Center$541,670
Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute Inc$500,000
Kelly Center for Hunger Relief$289,552
The EPC Museum$250,000
Project Vida Health Center$241,824
Common Threads$240,945
Paso del Norte Children's Development Center$225,652
Creative Kids$210,898
Family Service of El Paso$204,737
Texas A&M University$199,260
United Way of El Paso County$196,409
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Families and Youth Inc: $353k → 23%Families and Youth Inc: $163k → 23%Families and Youth Inc: $151k → 23%Families and Youth Inc: $90k → 23%Families and Youth Inc: $90k → 23%Families and Youth Inc: $89k → 23%Families and Youth Inc: $57k → 23%Families and Youth Inc: $46k → 23%Community Action Agency of Southern NM: $200k → 23%Community Action Agency of Southern NM: $196k → 23%Project Amistad: $38k → 21%Community Action Agency of Southern New Mexico: $126k → 23%Community Action Agency of Southern New Mexico: $115k → 23%Project Amistad: $36k → 21%Community Action Agency of Southern New Mexico: $83k → 23%Community Action Agency of Southern New Mexico: $83k → 23%Family Service of El Paso: $205k → 21%Family Service of El Paso Inc: $121k → 21%Family Service of El Paso: $104k → 21%Family Service of El Paso Inc: $98k → 21%Family Service of El Paso Inc: $97k → 21%Family Service of El Paso Inc: $97k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $1.4M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$1.4M · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: General support

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 25% of Paso del Norte Health Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Paso del Norte Health Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$62M · 90 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

90 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
46

Total granted

$62M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+24%

Still filing today

54%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $412k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    EL PASO DIABETES ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +389% · 56% of their budget
  • LS
    LA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +451% · 27% of their budget
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF EL PASO COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TE
    The EPC Museum La Nube
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • DR
    DRAPER RICHARDS KAPLAN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +38%
  • EH
    Emergence Health Network / El Paso MHMR
    one grant, 2019 · $222k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cancer Consortium of El Paso

The organization provides breast and cervical cancer screening, case management for diagnosed cancer patients, and community education on cancer to low income women that fall under the 200% poverty level and women over 50 that do not have…

Health
2
El Paso Community Action Program Project Bravo Inc

Our mission:project bravo builds bridges to opportunities that help individuals and families thrive in our community.

Community Improvement
3
El Centro Del Barrio Inc

CentroMed is a network of integrated primary care clinics providing accessible services of superior quality.

Human Services
4
Clinicas De Salud Del Pueblo Inc

Clinicas is the safety net provider for Imperial and Eastern Riverside Counties providing primary health care to low income and medically under served populations. We provide comprehensive, preventative and treatment services, pediatric,…

Health
5
El Paso Community Foundation

To establish charitable funds. To provide a vehicle for donors' varied interests. To promote local philanthropy. To provide leadership and resources in addressing local challenges and opportunities.

Philanthropy
6
La Familia Del Paso Inc

La Familia del Paso provides mental health services for adults and youth.

—
7
El Paso Pro-Musica

To present world-renowned musicians with a commitment to artisitic excellence to delight and educate the border region with chamber music.

—
8
El Paso Children's Hospital Corporation

To provide compassionate, coordinated, family-centered care for children with a dedicated commitment to excellent patient outcomes, inclusive leadership and innovative pediatric research and education.

Health
9
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
10
El Centro Family Health

El Centro Family Health (ECFH) is a non-profit New Mexico corporation that provides healthcare services primarily to people living in rural areas of northern New Mexico. ECFH operates primary care medical clinics in the communities of…

Health
11
Council On Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation

Lead efforts to identify and support initiatives that improve college readiness and ensure more students graduate with a college degree or certification. partner with education leaders, funders, and regional, state, and national…

Education
12
El Paso Area Christian Counseling Service

Counseling Services offering hope, healing, and restoration to hurting people, marriages, and families using respected therapy practices and solid biblical principles.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Paso Center for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tech Frontier Fab Lab El Paso. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%5%<5yr16%2%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr10%27%35–55yr10%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%1%<5yr16%2%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr17%7%20–35yr10%15%35–55yr10%42%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/89
the rest of the field
17%
5,324/32,062

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/74
Grantees still filing
51/74
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EL PASO DIABETES ASSOCIATION INC — $5,135,488 · OtherEL PASO DIABETES ASSOCIATION INCThe University of Texas at El Paso — $3,748,162 · OtherThe University of Texas at El PasoUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO — $1,780,436 · OtherTexas A&M University — $1,650,558 · OtherEL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER — $1,499,468 · OtherPaso del Norte Charitable Foundation — $1,263,761 · Other+98 more — $19,748,528 · Other+98 moreTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $9,785,102 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDAT…New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc — $1,230,085 · EducationNew Mexico State U…+4 more — $166,920 · EducationPaso del Norte Community Foundation — $3,125,237 · HealthPaso del Nort…MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $1,800,000 · HealthMEADOWS MENTA…PASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $1,072,437 · HealthPASO DEL NORT…PROJECT VIDA HEALTH CENTER — $726,982 · HealthPROJECT VIDA …El Paso Childrens Hospital Foundation — $529,457 · HealthEl Paso Child…THE FEMAP FOUNDATION — $277,660 · Health+7 more — $400,199 · HealthLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER — $2,748,594 · Food & NutritionKelly Center for Hunger Relief — $1,327,519 · Food & NutritionDESERT SPOON FOOD HUB — $524,590 · Food & NutritionEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER — $210,734 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $70,806 · Food & NutritionFAMILY SERVICE OF EL PASO INC — $1,947,758 · Human ServicesFAMILIES AND YOUTH INC — $1,606,626 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INC — $897,097 · Human ServicesChild Crisis Center of El Paso Inc — $184,722 · Human Services+5 more — $237,152 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF EL PASO COUNTY — $1,993,107 · PhilanthropyDRAPER RICHARDS KAPLAN FOUNDATION — $250,000 · PhilanthropyCouncil on Foundations Inc — $124,200 · Philanthropy+3 more — $40,190 · PhilanthropyCREATIVE KIDS INC — $934,380 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAS CRUCES — $565,075 · Youth Development+1 more — $33,000 · Youth Development
Other$34,826,401Education$11,182,107Health$7,931,972Food & Nutrition$4,882,243Human Services$4,873,355Philanthropy$2,407,497Youth Development$1,532,455

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $9,785,102 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetEL PASO DIABETES ASSOCIATION INC — $5,135,488 over 8y, 56% of budgetPaso del Norte Community Foundation — $3,125,237 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER — $2,748,594 over 8y, 27% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EL PASO COUNTY — $1,993,107 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF EL PASO INC — $1,947,758 over 8y, 31% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $1,800,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetFAMILIES AND YOUTH INC — $1,606,626 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetEL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER — $1,499,468 over 8y, 19% of budgetKelly Center for Hunger Relief — $1,327,519 over 8y, 51% of budgetNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc — $1,230,085 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetPASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $1,072,437 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCREATIVE KIDS INC — $934,380 over 8y, 35% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INC — $897,097 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetYucca Council Boy Scouts of America — $857,784 over 8y, 29% of budgetPROJECT VIDA HEALTH CENTER — $726,982 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetARBOL DE VIDA — $621,437 over 4y, 52% of budgetCOMMON THREADS — $607,710 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetBORDER PARTNERS — $575,130 over 4y, 59% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAS CRUCES — $565,075 over 8y, 14% of budgetCENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC — $531,577 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetEl Paso Childrens Hospital Foundation — $529,457 over 5y, 9.5% of budgetDESERT SPOON FOOD HUB — $524,590 over 4y, 35% of budgetTHE EPC MUSEUM DBA LA NUBE — $500,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EP — $290,241 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetTHE FEMAP FOUNDATION — $277,660 over 2y, 34% of budgetDRAPER RICHARDS KAPLAN FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetEL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC — $249,673 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF EL PASO — $219,934 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER — $210,734 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EL PASO INC — $190,921 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetPaso Del Norte Health Information Exchange — $189,699 over 2y, 11% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORGAN MOUNTAINS-DESERT PEAKS — $185,582 over 2y, 21% of budgetChild Crisis Center of El Paso Inc — $184,722 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH INNOVATION — $129,920 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc — $124,200 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $120,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity Medical Center Foundation of El Paso — $97,982 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetInsights-El Paso Science Center Inc — $95,839 over 3y, 17% of budgetPASO DEL NORTE CENTER OF HOPE — $91,567 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetRIO GRANDE CANCER FOUNDATION — $78,870 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetBORDERPLEX BI-NATIONAL ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION FKA EL PASO REG — $75,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetPROJECT AMISTAD INC — $74,743 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMUSTARD SEED - A COMMUNITY CAFE — $70,806 over 2y, 19% of budgetCASA OF EL PASO INC — $67,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTexans Care For Children Inc — $56,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetEL PASO HUMAN SERVICES INC — $54,336 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNAMI El Paso — $53,940 over 1y, 29% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO DIABETES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Paso del Norte Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF EL PASO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF EL PASO INC ↗
  • Who funds MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES AND YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Kelly Center for Hunger Relief ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc ↗
  • Who funds PASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INC ↗
  • Who funds Yucca Council Boy Scouts of America ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VIDA HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ARBOL DE VIDA ↗
  • Who funds COMMON THREADS ↗
  • Who funds BORDER PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAS CRUCES ↗
  • Who funds CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds El Paso Childrens Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DESERT SPOON FOOD HUB ↗
  • Who funds THE EPC MUSEUM DBA LA NUBE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paso del Norte Commun…El Paso Community Fou…United Way of El Paso…The Hunt Family Found…The Electric Company …Robert E & Evelyn McK…Wilma Donohue Moleen …Hervey FoundationCommunity Foundation …Carl C Anderson Sr an…The Shiloff Family Fo…Paul L Foster Family …
Paso del Norte Community FoundationTX77.5× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paso del Norte Community Foundation · El Paso Community Foundation · United Way of El Paso County · The Hunt Family Foundation · The Electric Company Charitable Foundation · Robert E & Evelyn McKee Foundation · Wilma Donohue Moleen Foundation Xxxxx7003 · Hervey Foundation · Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · The Shiloff Family Foundation · Paul L Foster Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Paso del Norte Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 146 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines