· Private foundation
The Hollander-Urbach Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of THE HOLLANDER-URBACH FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k46 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $10,000 |
| LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $9,724 |
| RACE TO ERASE MS | $5,000 |
| WALKING IN THE SPIRIT OF EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION | $2,600 |
| DEBORAH'S PLACE | $2,117 |
| GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY | $2,104 |
| ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $2,030 |
| WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS | $2,000 |
| MORRISVILLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $1,565 |
| PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $1,500 |
| CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDENS | $1,500 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA | $1,374 |
| THE PEOPLE CONCERN | $1,080 |
| A PLACE CALLED HOME | $1,049 |
| STAND WITH US | $1,037 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
79 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LFLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA GEORGIA CHAPTER INC6× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue +95%
- LALOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK6× · 2019–2025 · $29k · revenue +109%
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY7× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- DCDUKE CANCER INSTITUTEone grant, 2018 · $12k
- HIHIAS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +60%
- ACACCELERATED CURE PROJECT INCone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…
To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.
AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…
The alliance for aging research is the leading nonprofit organization dedicated to changing the narrative to achieve healthy aging and equitable access to care.
Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward and the most unlike its peers is Ex-Cons for Community and Social Change. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
112 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 112 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA GEORGIA CHAPTER INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds RACE TO ERASE MS ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds DEBORAH'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds SARAH'S CIRCLE ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds MORRISVILLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATED CURE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Selig Foundation Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Phyllis and Eliot Arnovitz Charitable Foundation Inc · The Zaban Foundation Inc · The Scharff Foundation Inc · Cooper Family Foundation Inc · Hertz Douglas J Family Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hollander-Urbach Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.