Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hillside Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$42MFood & Nutrition$9.2MHealth$4.1MEducation$1.5MEnvironment$1.1MHuman Services$1.1MInternational$600kPhilanthropy$600kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.1M
$500,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION$1,166,667
ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE$1,000,000
UC BERKLEY FOUNDATION$500,000
DC GREENS$500,000
SYNGAP RESEARCH FUND$455,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$277,627
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$250,000
THE DEFIANT REQUIEM FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $950k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE BARKER ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $250k → 8%THE BARKER ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $200k → 8%THE BARKER ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $200k → 8%THE BARKER ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $200k → 8%THE BARKER ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Hillside Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in DC; by stated purpose, 76%.

The Hillside Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59M · 20 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$59M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+82%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    8× · 2017–2024 · $23M · revenue +25%
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12M · revenue +31%
  • DG
    DC Greens Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.4M · revenue +3% · 33% of their budget

Funded once

  • MH
    MEDSTAR HEALTH GEORGETOWN
    one grant, 2020 · $500k
  • KK
    KENNEDY KRIEGER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
  • MV
    MARTHA'S VINEYARD ICE ARENA
    one grant, 2017 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
7
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
8
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
9
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University; the most unlike its peers is SynGAP Research Fund Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $22,770,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial MuseumSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $12,098,334 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONThe Defiant Requiem Foundation: $1,750,882 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $225,000 · Arts & CultureDC Greens Inc: $5,400,000 · Community ImprovementDC Greens IncTHE KENNEDY-WARREN RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,135,000 · Community ImprovementTHE KENNEDY-WARREN …UC BERKLEY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherUC BERKLEY …Youth Invest Partners Inc: $600,000 · OtherYouth Inves…Individual grant recipient: $500,000 · OtherIndividual …MEDSTAR HEALTH GEORGETOWN: $500,000 · OtherMEDSTAR HEA…KENNEDY KRIEGER SOCIETY: $500,000 · OtherKENNEDY KRI…INOVA SCHAR CANCER INSTITUTE: $428,000 · OtherINOVA SCHAR…MV BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $266,667 · OtherMARTHA'S VINEYARD ICE ARENA: $250,000 · OtherSynGAP Research Fund Incorporated: $705,000 · OtherSynGAP Rese…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $600,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF …MARTHA'S VINEYARD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $333,333 · Other+8 more: $600,000 · Other+8 moreISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD: $3,825,000 · Food & NutritionTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $1,844,850 · HealthMercy Medical Center: $250,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $250,000 · HealthThe Barker Adoption Foundation: $950,000 · Human ServicesJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $902,627 · Education
Arts & Culture$36,844,216Community Improvement$10,535,000Other$6,283,000Food & Nutrition$3,825,000Health$2,344,850Human Services$950,000Education$902,627

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $22,770,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $12,098,334 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDC Greens Inc: $5,400,000 over 8y, 33% of budgetISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD: $3,825,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $1,844,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Defiant Requiem Foundation: $1,750,882 over 6y, 50% of budgetThe Barker Adoption Foundation: $950,000 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $902,627 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSynGAP Research Fund Incorporated: $705,000 over 2y, 65% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $600,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYouth Invest Partners Inc: $600,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $333,333 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetMercy Medical Center: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetEVERY1 CAN WORK: $50,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetDOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds DC Greens Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE KENNEDY-WARREN RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds The Defiant Requiem Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Barker Adoption Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SynGAP Research Fund Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds Youth Invest Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEYS IN FILM ↗
  • Who funds EVERY1 CAN WORK ↗
  • Who funds DOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hillside Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hillside Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Martha's Vineyard Boys & Girls Club Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Island Grown Initiative Ltd: 0% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital: 0% of income from government
  • Mercy Medical Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hillside Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Hillside Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hillside’s filings →

More from the funding graph