Skip to content
The Henry Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Henry Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
87
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$3.9MHealth$3.6MHuman Services$2.3MYouth Development$1.0MRecreation & Sports$993kHousing & Shelter$822kFood & Nutrition$598kPhilanthropy$493kOther$0
02FY2025 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k56 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $851k
  • $250k+2 grants · $564k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Permian Basin Behavioral Health Center$300,000
Individual grant recipient$264,000
Midland College Foundation$172,000
Our Lady of Guadalupe Catholic Church$160,000
West Texas Food Bank$125,000
Basin Dream Center of Orphans$104,000
Bush Tennis Center$80,000
United Way of Midland$55,471
Casa de Amigos of Midland Inc$55,000
Hellinghausen Hope Inc$50,000
Archway Outreach Inc$50,000
Boys and Girls Club of Midland Inc$44,000
Buckner Children and Family Services$39,000
Community Children's Clinic Ministry$39,000
Unlock Ministries Inc$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Arms of Hope: $10k → 12%Arms of Hope: $10k → 12%Manor Park: $100k → 12%Denton Assistance Center: $15k → 8%The Springboard Center: $65k → 14%Manor Park: $73k → 12%The Springboard Center: $60k → 14%Hearts For Homes: $10k → 8%The Springboard Center: $57k → 14%Buckner Children and Family Services: $39k → 14%Hearts For Homes: $10k → 8%Buckner Children and Family Services: $39k → 14%Hearts For Homes: $10k → 8%Buckner Children and Family Services: $38k → 14%Buckner Children and Family Services: $38k → 14%Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin: $40k → 14%The Springboard Center: $38k → 14%Buckner Children and Family Services: $18k → 14%Buckner Children and Family Services: $16k → 14%Journey to Dream Foundation: $10k → 8%Denton County Friends of the Family: $10k → 8%Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin: $35k → 14%Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin: $35k → 14%Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin: $35k → 14%Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin: $35k → 14%Community Partners of Denton County: $10k → 8%The Springboard Center: $32k → 14%Community Partners of Denton County: $10k → 8%Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin: $30k → 14%Cumberland Youth & Family Service: $10k → 8%Siti and Jido Park Foundation: $10k → 8%Samaritan Counseling Center of West Texas: $30k → 12%Samaritan Counseling Center of West Texas: $30k → 12%Samaritan Counseling Center of West Texas: $25k → 12%Samaritan Counseling Center of West Texas: $21k → 12%Samaritan Counseling Center of West Texas: $20k → 12%Samaritan Counseling Center of West Texas: $15k → 12%United Way of Midland: $115k → 12%United Way of Midland: $55k → 12%Greater Ideal Family Life Center: $50k → 12%Greater Ideal Family Life Center: $41k → 12%United Way of Midland: $40k → 12%United Way of Midland: $40k → 12%United Way of Midland: $38k → 12%United Way of Midland: $33k → 12%Centers for Children and Families Inc: $35k → 12%Centers for Children and Families Inc: $20k → 12%Centers for Children and Families Inc: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
AZ
TN
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 137 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

137 repeat relationships: 65 still active in FY2025, 72 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

137
80

Total granted

$14M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+16%

Still filing today

72%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $219k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +100%
  • IP
    IDEA Public Schools
    2× · 2020–2021 · $800k · revenue +78%
  • BT
    BUSH TENNIS CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $368k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • PB
    PERMIAN BASIN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue +28%
  • LC
    Literacy Coalition of the PB
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • PB
    PERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRARY AND HALL OF FAMEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Permian Basin Animal Advocates

Permian basin animal advocates strives to educate and help the public with spay and neuter while also rescuing abandoned or unwanted animals and finding them forever homes.

Animals
2
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
3
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
4
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
5
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
6
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
7
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
8
One Tail At a Time West Texas

One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…

Animals
9
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
10
The Sanctuary Foster Care Services

Achieving permanent sanctuary and healing homes for children and families from hard places.

Human Services
11
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
12
Fix West Texas

Fix West Texas mission is to lower the local euthanasia rate dogs and cats put to sleep in our local shelter due to lack of space and to lower intakes number of dogs and cats taken in by the local shelter and local rescues in our West…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Texas Solutions for Recovery; the most unlike its peers is Midland Polo Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

163 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 163 of the 241 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
35
Early backer (in before they grew)
160/163
Grantees still filing
111/163
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $645,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBUSH TENNIS CENTER: $368,000 · OtherBUSH TENNIS CENTERCasa de Amigos of Midland Inc: $333,000 · OtherSenior Life of Midland: $266,000 · OtherWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $238,000 · OtherMIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC: $240,000 · Other+118 more: $4,445,686 · Other+118 moreMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,402,000 · EducationMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDAT…IDEA Public Schools: $800,000 · EducationIDEA Public SchoolsUNLOCK MINISTRIES INC DBA OPPORTUNITY TRIBE: $200,500 · EducationUNLOCK MINISTRIES INC D…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE PERMIAN BA: $195,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS …APHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC: $180,000 · EducationAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST …TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · Education+9 more: $327,385 · Education+9 moreUNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC: $322,271 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF …THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $260,500 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGBOAR…The Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin Inc: $210,000 · Human ServicesThe Nonprofit …BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $186,500 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDR…MANOR PARK INC: $173,000 · Human ServicesMANOR PARK INCBASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS: $154,000 · Human ServicesBASIN DREAM CE…SAMARITAN CENTER INC: $140,500 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN CENT…Restored Hope Ministries Inc: $125,000 · Human ServicesRestored Hope …GREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $93,500 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $75,000 · Human Services+19 more: $281,011 · Human Services+19 morePERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER: $1,000,000 · HealthPERMIAN BASIN…MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $140,500 · HealthMIDLAND CHILD…MISSION HEALTH CARE INC: $131,000 · HealthMISSION HEALT…DOMUS PACIS FAMILY RESPITE INC: $116,111 · HealthDOMUS PACIS F…HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $91,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $88,334 · Health+9 more: $258,500 · Health+9 moreARCHWAY OUTREACH INC: $686,000 · PhilanthropyCROSS TIMBERS ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES INC: $140,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $60,250 · PhilanthropyThe Fields Edge: $276,500 · Housing & ShelterHELLINGHAUSEN HOPE INC: $175,000 · Housing & ShelterMIDLAND FAIR HAVENS: $28,500 · Housing & ShelterMIDLAND PARKER PLACE INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterREFLECTION MINISTRIES OF TEXAS INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC: $219,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $124,111 · Youth DevelopmentRedirectional Outreach Program Efforts for Youth: $68,000 · Youth DevelopmentMIDLAND YOUNG LIFE BUILDING FOUNDATION: $26,111 · Youth Development+1 more: $12,000 · Youth Development
Other$6,536,186Education$3,224,885Human Services$2,021,282Health$1,825,445Philanthropy$886,250Housing & Shelter$525,000Youth Development$449,222

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,402,000 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER: $1,000,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetIDEA Public Schools: $800,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARCHWAY OUTREACH INC: $686,000 over 6y, 57% of budgetBUSH TENNIS CENTER: $368,000 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC: $322,271 over 6y, 10% of budgetThe Fields Edge: $276,500 over 6y, 14% of budgetTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $260,500 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetMIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC: $240,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $238,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC: $219,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $210,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetThe Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin Inc: $210,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetUNLOCK MINISTRIES INC DBA OPPORTUNITY TRIBE: $200,500 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE PERMIAN BA: $195,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $186,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC: $180,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetHELLINGHAUSEN HOPE INC: $175,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetMANOR PARK INC: $173,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS: $154,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetCITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC: $145,342 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $140,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSAMARITAN CENTER INC: $140,500 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetCROSS TIMBERS ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES INC: $140,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetMISSION HEALTH CARE INC: $131,000 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetRestored Hope Ministries Inc: $125,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $125,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $124,111 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN FLOW YOUTH MINISTRY: $120,592 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDOMUS PACIS FAMILY RESPITE INC: $116,111 over 4y, 13% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE PERMIAN BASIN INC: $103,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL: $100,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAGAPE CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $100,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetHISPANIC CULTURAL CENTER OF MIDLAND: $95,000 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $95,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER IDEAL FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $93,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $91,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $88,334 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS: $85,000 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetAustin Wildlife Rescue: $85,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetMARC INC: $85,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSE RABBIT RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $75,250 over 5y, 11% of budgetCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $68,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRedirectional Outreach Program Efforts for Youth: $68,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetSIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN GIFTS OF HOPE INC: $51,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds IDEA Public Schools ↗
  • Who funds ARCHWAY OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds BUSH TENNIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds The Fields Edge ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
  • Who funds The Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNLOCK MINISTRIES INC DBA OPPORTUNITY TRIBE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE PERMIAN BA ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds APHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HELLINGHAUSEN HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds MANOR PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSS TIMBERS ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Restored Hope Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds TEEN FLOW YOUTH MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMUS PACIS FAMILY RESPITE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Abell-Hanger Foundati…Scharbauer Foundation…Permian Basin Area Fo…Helen Greathouse Char…Beal FoundationWayne & Jo Ann Moore …Pevehouse Family Foun…Fmh FoundationWarren Charitable Fou…The Fasken FoundationPaul and Katherine Mo…Yarborough Foundation
Abell-Hanger FoundationTX145.1× affinity71 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Beal Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Fmh Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation · Yarborough Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Henry Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Henry Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Henry Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Henry Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 241 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Henry’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home