Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hadley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$57kHuman Services$31kPhilanthropy$22kEducation$11kMembership Benefit$8kAnimals$6kFood & Nutrition$6kEmployment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$310k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS$4,000
LAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPP$3,000
ST RAYMOND OF THE MOUNTAINS$2,500
MEALS ON WHEELS$2,000
CARMELITE MONASTERY$2,000
VESTED INTEREST IN K-9S$2,000
ANGEL'S PLACE$2,000
AMERICAN LEGION POST 181$2,000
ST VINCENT ARCHABBEY$2,000
WICHITA FALLS FOOD BANK$1,500
FRANKLIN CO VETERANS AFFAIRS$1,500
IHM SISTERS$1,500
OKLAHOMAS FFA FOUNDATION$1,000
ST JOHN OF APOSTLE FUND$1,000
MCHS FAMILY OF SERVICES$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EMPOWERHER: $3k → 7%LAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPP: $3k → 10%LAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPP: $3k → 10%CHRISTIAN FAMILY CHILDRENS CENTER: $4k → 17%Niagara Hospice: $1k → 14%POPE FRANCIS CENTER: $1k → 21%ANGEL'S PLACE: $2k → 8%POPE FRANCIS CENTER: $1k → 21%MCHS FAMILY OF SERVICES: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
NJ
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$97k · 21 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
45

Total granted

$97k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+22%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPPORTUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +216%
  • TC
    THIS CHILD HERE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +63%
  • WS
    WESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAH Charitable Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE ALEGHEN
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
2
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
3
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
4
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

5
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

6
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

7
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

8
Willamette Vital Health

We provide comprehensive hospice care services, supportive care for pain & symptom management for those with serious illness, and grief support. through our mission, willamette vital health supports adults and children living with a…

Human Services
9
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
10
Hospice of the Piedmont Inc

To guide life's final journey with expertise and empathy.

11
Montgomery Hospice Inc

To gentle the journey through serious illness and loss with skill and compassion. to bring comfort by providing compassionate, professional care to community residents who are facing serious illness and loss. to provide dignity for the…

Human Services
12
Hospice of Holland Inc

The mission of hospice of holland is to provide the most compassionate and highest quality end-of-life care through physical, emotional, and spiritual support.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Renewed Hope Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Humane Society of Somerset County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsCommunity Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChild and Family ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsVolunteer Fire DepartmentsHospice Care ServicesGovernment Accountability R…Classical Music EnsemblesVeteran Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%7%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr17%7%20–35yr15%24%35–55yr17%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%10%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr17%4%20–35yr15%14%35–55yr17%47%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,133

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST VINCENT ARCHABBEY — $13,500 · OtherST VINCENT ARCHABBEYLAH Charitable Foundation — $10,000 · OtherLAH Charitable FoundationFRANKLIN CO VETERANS AFFAIRS — $8,500 · OtherFRANKLIN CO VETERANS AFFAIRSSETON LASALLE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC — $8,000 · OtherSETON LASALLE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INCCARMELITE MONASTERY — $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $6,000 · OtherSISTERS SERVANTS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY MONROE MICHIGAN INC — $5,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE ALEGHEN — $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · Other+45 more — $80,250 · Other+45 moreLAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPPORTUNITY CENTER — $5,500 · Human ServicesLAUREL HIGHLAN…THIS CHILD HERE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHIS CHILD HER…INDIAN CREEK VALLEY CHRISTIAN FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER — $4,000 · Human ServicesINDIAN CREEK V…EMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesEMPOWER GRIEVI…POPE FRANCIS CENTER — $2,000 · Human ServicesPOPE FRANCIS C…ANGELS' PLACE — $2,000 · Human ServicesANGELS' PLACENIAGARA HOSPICE INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesMethodist Children's Home Society — $1,000 · Human ServicesWESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $2,325 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTIMEDIA — $2,000 · Arts & CultureVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC — $2,000 · AnimalsACTION FOR ANIMALS INC — $1,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY — $500 · AnimalsWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $3,000 · InternationalTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 · HealthMUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC — $100 · HealthFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Education
Other$148,250Human Services$23,000Arts & Culture$4,325Animals$3,500International$3,000Health$2,600Education$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPPORTUNITY CENTER — $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHIS CHILD HERE INC — $5,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 0181 — $4,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetINDIAN CREEK VALLEY CHRISTIAN FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $2,325 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPOPE FRANCIS CENTER — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS' PLACE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOSPA MISSIONS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION RENEWED HOPE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNIAGARA HOSPICE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION FOR ANIMALS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEASHES OF VALOR — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPPORTUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds THIS CHILD HERE INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 0181
  • Who funds INDIAN CREEK VALLEY CHRISTIAN FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds EMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds POPE FRANCIS CENTER
  • Who funds ANGELS' PLACE
  • Who funds WQED MULTIMEDIA
  • Who funds VESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC
  • Who funds GOSPA MISSIONS
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA16.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Allegheny Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hadley Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hadley Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hadley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph