Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hadley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$57kHuman Services$31kPhilanthropy$22kEducation$11kMembership Benefit$8kAnimals$6kFood & Nutrition$6kEmployment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$310k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS$4,000
LAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPP$3,000
ST RAYMOND OF THE MOUNTAINS$2,500
VESTED INTEREST IN K-9S$2,000
ST VINCENT ARCHABBEY$2,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$2,000
CARMELITE MONASTERY$2,000
ANGEL'S PLACE$2,000
AMERICAN LEGION POST 181$2,000
WICHITA FALLS FOOD BANK$1,500
FRANKLIN CO VETERANS AFFAIRS$1,500
IHM SISTERS$1,500
MCHS FAMILY OF SERVICES$1,000
POPE FRANCIS CENTER$1,000
OKLAHOMAS FFA FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EMPOWERHER: $3k → 7%LAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPP: $3k → 10%LAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPP: $3k → 10%CHRISTIAN FAMILY CHILDRENS CENTER: $4k → 17%Niagara Hospice: $1k → 14%POPE FRANCIS CENTER: $1k → 21%ANGEL'S PLACE: $2k → 8%POPE FRANCIS CENTER: $1k → 21%MCHS FAMILY OF SERVICES: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
NJ
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$97k · 21 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
45

Total granted

$97k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+22%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPPORTUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +216%
  • TC
    THIS CHILD HERE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +63%
  • WS
    WESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAH Charitable Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE ALEGHEN
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
2
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
3
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
4
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
5
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
6
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
7
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
8
Willamette Vital Health

We provide comprehensive hospice care services, supportive care for pain & symptom management for those with serious illness, and grief support. through our mission, willamette vital health supports adults and children living with a…

Human Services
9
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
10
Hospice of the Piedmont Inc

To guide life's final journey with expertise and empathy.

—
11
Montgomery Hospice Inc

To gentle the journey through serious illness and loss with skill and compassion. to bring comfort by providing compassionate, professional care to community residents who are facing serious illness and loss. to provide dignity for the…

Human Services
12
Hospice of Holland Inc

The mission of hospice of holland is to provide the most compassionate and highest quality end-of-life care through physical, emotional, and spiritual support.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Renewed Hope Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Humane Society of Somerset County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST VINCENT ARCHABBEY: $13,500 · OtherST VINCENT ARCHABBEYLAH Charitable Foundation: $10,000 · OtherLAH Charitable FoundationFRANKLIN CO VETERANS AFFAIRS: $8,500 · OtherFRANKLIN CO VETERANS AFFAIRSSETON LASALLE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $8,000 · OtherSETON LASALLE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INCIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherCARMELITE MONASTERY: $6,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE ALEGHEN: $5,500 · OtherSISTERS SERVANTS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY MONROE MICHIGAN INC: $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+45 more: $80,250 · Other+45 moreLAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $5,500 · Human ServicesLAUREL HIGHLAN…THIS CHILD HERE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHIS CHILD HER…INDIAN CREEK VALLEY CHRISTIAN FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER: $4,000 · Human ServicesINDIAN CREEK V…EMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesEMPOWER GRIEVI…ANGELS' PLACE: $2,000 · Human ServicesANGELS' PLACEPOPE FRANCIS CENTER: $2,000 · Human ServicesPOPE FRANCIS C…Methodist Children's Home Society: $1,000 · Human ServicesNIAGARA HOSPICE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2,325 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTIMEDIA: $2,000 · Arts & CultureVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC: $2,000 · AnimalsACTION FOR ANIMALS INC: $1,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $500 · AnimalsWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · InternationalTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 · HealthMUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $100 · HealthFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Education
Other$148,250Human Services$23,000Arts & Culture$4,325Animals$3,500International$3,000Health$2,600Education$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHIS CHILD HERE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetINDIAN CREEK VALLEY CHRISTIAN FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 0181: $4,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2,325 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS' PLACE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOSPA MISSIONS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPOPE FRANCIS CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEASHES OF VALOR: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION RENEWED HOPE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACTION FOR ANIMALS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNIAGARA HOSPICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAUREL HIGHLANDS WORKFORCE AND OPPORTUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THIS CHILD HERE INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN CREEK VALLEY CHRISTIAN FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 0181 ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS' PLACE ↗
  • Who funds WQED MULTIMEDIA ↗
  • Who funds GOSPA MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds VESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC ↗
  • Who funds POPE FRANCIS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA16.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Allegheny Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hadley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hadley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hadley Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hadley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hadley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph