Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Greenberg Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
106
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$289k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$4.0MEducation$300kEnvironment$189kCrime & Legal$150kCivil Rights$95kInternational$82kPublic Benefit$81kHealth$63kOther$0
02FY2025 · 106 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k84 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $301k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $390k
  • $250k+1 grant · $289k
$1,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$8.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO$289,000
LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART$200,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS$140,000
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION$50,000
HAMMER MUSEUM$39,850
J PAUL GETTY TRUST$33,585
CRAFT IN AMERICA$25,000
AMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM$25,000
URBAN GLASS$25,000
TURN AROUND ARTS CALIFORNIA$15,000
CRAFT CONTEMPORARY$15,000
MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION$15,000
HARRIETT BUHAI CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW$15,000
CATALYST CALIFORNIA$12,500
RETREAT$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RETREAT: $10k → 7%WORKMONEY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%PEOPLE CONCERN: $1k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $1k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $500 → 14%WORKMONEY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $500 → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $7k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $6k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $6k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $6k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $6k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $6k → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $6k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $5k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MN
WI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
AR
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of The Greenberg Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 80% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Greenberg Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 117 repeat orgs$370k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

117 repeat relationships — 89 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

117
85

Total granted

$4.7M
$305k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+14%

Still filing today

88%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthInternationalCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +31%
  • MA
    MUSEUM ASSOCIATES
    5× · 2019–2025 · $863k · revenue +89%
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $678k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • C
    CLIENTEARTH
    one grant, 2019 · $44k
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
    one grant, 2019 · $36k · revenue -17%
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $33k · revenue +76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

5
California Institute of Contemporary Art
6
Arts for La

Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.

Arts & Culture
7
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
8
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
9
American Academy of Arts & Sciences

Founded in 1780, the american academy of arts and sciences honors excellence and convenes leaders from every field of human endeavor to examine new ideas, address issues of importance to the nation and the world, and work together "to…

Social Science
10
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
11
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
12
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Autry Museum of the American West and the most unlike its peers is Unatti Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsLocal History MuseumsDomestic Violence ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersCancer Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Jewish Community Organizati…Women & Girls Leadership De…Lgbtq+ Community SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Animal Rescue and ShelterSchool District FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…Public Library OperationsEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr13%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%12%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%8%35–55yr13%45%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.6% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%1/178
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,800

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

174 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 174 of the 222 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
31
Early backer (in before they grew)
172/174
Grantees still filing
116/174
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $1,043,480 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIOMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $863,171 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATESCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS — $677,750 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTSARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $509,626 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INCSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $126,500 · Arts & Culture+38 more — $456,206 · Arts & Culture+38 moreSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTENATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY — $76,710 · OtherSMITHSONIAN I…J PAUL GETTY MUSEUM — $69,385 · OtherJ PAUL GETTY …CLIENTEARTH — $44,333 · OtherCLIENTEARTHADAT ARI EL — $30,550 · OtherTHE INVISIBLE DOG ART CENTER — $25,000 · OtherWOMEN LAWYERS ASSN OF LOS ANGELES FOUNDATION — $20,570 · OtherAPPALACHIAN PEACE EDUCATION CENTER INC — $25,000 · OtherCATALYST CALIFORNIA — $23,500 · Other+100 more — $300,783 · Other+100 moreREED INSTITUTE — $125,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY LAW LIBRARY — $97,155 · EducationCivic Nation — $40,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $25,000 · EducationICIVICS INC — $15,000 · Education+21 more — $53,450 · EducationCLIENTEARTH USA INC — $115,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND — $35,000 · Environment+4 more — $10,880 · EnvironmentTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST — $155,983 · Philanthropy+2 more — $4,750 · PhilanthropyHARRIETT BUHAI CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW — $115,000 · Crime & LegalBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE — $5,500 · Crime & Legal+5 more — $10,250 · Crime & LegalWELLS BRING HOPE — $44,000 · Human ServicesWORKMONEY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesRetreat Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $4,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER — $3,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,100 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$3,676,733Other$615,831Education$355,605Environment$160,880Philanthropy$160,733Crime & Legal$130,750Human Services$87,100

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $1,043,480 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $863,171 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS — $677,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $509,626 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST — $155,983 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $126,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREED INSTITUTE — $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLIENTEARTH USA INC — $115,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHARRIETT BUHAI CENTER FOR FAMILY LAW — $115,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY LAW LIBRARY — $97,155 over 7y, 8.3% of budgetCRAFT CONTEMPORARY — $91,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetURBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC — $55,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWELLS BRING HOPE — $44,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetCivic Nation — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $33,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNAROUND ARTS CALIFORNIA — $30,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN PEACE EDUCATION CENTER INC — $25,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetCATALYST CALIFORNIA — $23,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWORKMONEY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES INC — $17,627 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetThe Boat Company Ltd — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACCELERATE CHANGE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetICIVICS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNTAIN THEATRE — $14,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetPLAYPENN INC — $14,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN KOSOVO FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFair Elections Center — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLos Angeles River Revitalization Corporation dba River LA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATION LAW CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA44× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · The J Paul Getty Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Achieving America Family Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Greenberg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Icivics Inc13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Portland Art Museum1% of income from government
  • Reed Institute1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Greenberg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Greenberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 222 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph