Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Good Samaritan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$253k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$255kHealth$185kInternational$148kHousing & Shelter$136kReligion$76kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kHuman Services$47k
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
$7,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$60,000
BAPTIST'S ON MISSION$50,000
GOD'S PIT CREW$50,000
THE BRIDGE MINISTRY OF NASHVILLE$10,000
HOPE HAVEN$10,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK-METROLINA$7,500
HOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES$7,500
THOMPSON CHILD FAMILY FOCUS$7,500
HARVEST CENTER OF CHARLOTTE$7,500
OPERATION HEALING FORCE$6,000
FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VA$6,000
GREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK$6,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$6,000
CARITAS$5,000
FEED MY LAMBS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OPERATION HEALING FORCE: $6k → 12%FEED MY LAMBS: $7k → 22%OPTIONS INCORPORATED: $4k → 20%OPERATION HEALING FORCE: $6k → 12%FEED MY LAMBS: $5k → 22%OPTIONS INCORPORATED: $3k → 20%OPERATION HEALING FORCE: $4k → 12%FEED MY LAMBS: $5k → 22%OPTIONS INCORPORATED: $3k → 20%OPERATION HEALING FORCE: $3k → 12%FEED MY LAMBS: $3k → 22%OPTIONS INCORPORATED: $3k → 20%OPERATION HEALING FORCE: $3k → 12%FEED MY LAMBS: $3k → 22%OPTIONS INCORPORATED: $3k → 20%OPERATION HEALING FORCE: $2k → 12%FEED MY LAMBS: $3k → 22%OPTIONS INCORPORATED: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

KY
VA
TN
NC
LA
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Good Samaritan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 57% of the giving stays in NC; by stated purpose, 53%.

The Good Samaritan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$764k · 20 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$764k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+26%

Still filing today

65%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHuman ServicesReligionPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $148k · revenue +151%
  • CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $139k · revenue +44%
  • NR
    NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $38k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • TC
    THOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +26%
  • TW
    TEAM WESTERN KENTUCKY TORNADO
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CT
    CARITAS - THE HEALING PLACE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union Mission Ministries Inc

Union mission ministries, inc. is set apart by the spirit of god to preach the gospel and meet physical and emotional needs through out west virginia through the provision of shelter, clothing, food, counseling, and structured programs for…

Human Services
2
Lexington Rescue Mission

The organization is a Christ-centered ministry that meets the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of hurting people in the greater Lexington area. Its activities are focused on rebuilding lives.

Human Services
3
The Hope Center Inc

Our mission is to provide comprehensive life-sustaining and life-rebuilding services that promote healing from substance use disorder, mental health disorders, and homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
4
Cabarrus Cooperative Christian Ministry

To respond to the growing need in our community by providing immediate assistance to residents of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County, NC who are experiencing crisis in the areas of food, shelter or finances while providing them…

—
5
Samaritan Ministries

Our mission is providing food, shelter, and hope through christian love

Housing & Shelter
6
Rescue Missions Ministries Inc

Our mission is to meet, through the power of jesus christ, the spiritual, educational, emotional, physical, social, and vocational needs of the whole person so that those who are hurting may become fully functioning members of society. the…

—
7
Feeding Charlotte Inc

Feeding Charlotte rescues surplus, freshly prepared meals to reduce food waste and feed the hungry. We believe no food should be wasted while people go hungry in our community. To make this possible, we pickup unused, excess freshly…

Food & Nutrition
8
Hope Ministries

Hope ministries is one of the largest private providers of free meals, safe shelter, and comprehensive life-recovery support for homeless, near-homeless, and hungry men, women, and children in iowa. the mission of hope ministries is to…

Human Services
9
Union Gospel Mission Association of St Paul Inc

We provide christ-centered, life-changing pathways for all people who are experiencing homelessness, hunger and addiction.

Human Services
10
Butte Rescue Mission

The Butte Rescue Mission is transforming lives in Jesus's name, offering assistance to those facing homelessness by providing food, shelter and clothing to restore individuals and reunite families, empowering them to reintegrate into…

—
11
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
12
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $68,500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKNORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST MEN: $50,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST MENGREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK: $36,500 · OtherGREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANKTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY OF NASHVILLE: $30,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY OF NASHVILLETHE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC: $26,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY INCA CHILD'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE INC: $26,000 · OtherA CHILD'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE INCMCMAINS CHILDRENS DVLPMT CENTER: $11,000 · Other+7 more: $41,000 · Other+7 moreCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $139,000 · HealthCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISS…Hope Haven Inc: $23,000 · HealthHope Haven IncTHE HEALING PLACE: $12,000 · HealthTHE HEALING PLACESAMARITAN'S PURSE: $148,300 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEThe Harvest Center of Charlotte Inc: $44,000 · Food & NutritionThe Harvest…FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $36,500 · Food & NutritionFOODBANK OF…Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $7,500 · Food & NutritionSecond Harv…HOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES INC: $44,000 · Housing & ShelterHOSKINS PA…NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $38,000 · Housing & ShelterNASHVILLE …CARITAS: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterCARITASFEED MY LAMBS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesOPTIONS INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesGODS PIT CREW INC: $50,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$289,000Health$174,000Religion$148,300Food & Nutrition$88,000Housing & Shelter$87,000Human Services$65,000Public Safety & Disaster$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $148,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $139,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGODS PIT CREW INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES INC: $44,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetThe Harvest Center of Charlotte Inc: $44,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $38,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $36,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK: $36,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA CHILD'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE INC: $26,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFEED MY LAMBS INC: $25,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetHope Haven Inc: $23,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOPTIONS INC: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEALING PLACE: $12,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds GODS PIT CREW INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Harvest Center of Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds A CHILD'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY LAMBS INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds THOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC ↗
  • Who funds Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Good Samaritan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Good Samaritan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Good Samaritan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Good Samaritan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Good Samaritan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph