· Private foundation
The Ensign-Bickford Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k44 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $87k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC | $60,000 |
| SOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS | $30,000 |
| CONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER | $30,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $17,000 |
| SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS | $5,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC | $5,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHWEST NEW ENGLAND | $5,000 |
| COLCHESTER ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL-AGE TOTAL LEARNING EXPERIENCE INC CASTLE INC | $5,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC | $5,000 |
| SOUTH WINDSOR HIGH SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN | $5,000 |
| HEALING MEALS FOUNDATION CORP | $3,500 |
| PEDIGREE FOUNDATION | $3,150 |
| ALPHA KAPPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
139 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 118 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER INC6× · 2020–2025 · $248k · revenue +116%
- SOSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS5× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +32%
Foundation for Portland Public Schools5× · 2020–2025 · $84k · revenue +104%
Funded once
- SOSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS (CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL)one grant, 2024 · $30k
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +36%- CACOME AND DINE (FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF AURORA)one grant, 2024 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Education and Research
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children and the most unlike its peers is Simsbury Free Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
218 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 218 of the 417 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CLARKSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Portland Public Schools ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds National Society of Black Engineers ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Tuskegee University ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Simsbury Historical Society Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALING MEALS FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT WOMENS HALL OF FAME INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO WOMEN'S EDUCATION FOUNDATI ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS IN STEM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Robert & Margaret Patricelli Family Foundation · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation · Horizon Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · John T Gorman Foundation · Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ensign-Bickford Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Village for Families and Children — 50% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Three Bays Preservation Inc — 18% of income from government
- Connecticut Science Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Levo International Inc — 10% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
- New Britain Police Athletic League Inc — 9% of income from government
- Connecticut Theater Company Inc — 8% of income from government
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Huntington Theatre Co Inc — 4% of income from government
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Veterans Base Camp Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Salem Mission Inc — 4% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc — 2% of income from government
- University of Hartford — 1% of income from government
- New England Wildlife Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Goodspeed Opera House Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Healing Meals Foundation Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Hartford Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Trinity College — 0% of income from government
- Baystate Health Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Ensign-Bickford Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Ensign-Bickford Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.