Skip to content
The Ed and Yvonne Parish Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Ed and Yvonne Parish Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$108kHealth$94kEducation$75kEnvironment$70kAnimals$15kYouth Development$7kFood & Nutrition$6kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$384k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL COWBOY & WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM$10,000
REDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,000
REED SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$10,000
STROKE AWARENESS FOUNDATION$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
GRIZZLY & WOLF DISCOVERY CENTER$1,000
THE ALS ASSOCIATION$1,000
LUNG CANCER ALLIANCE$1,000
ANNE K TAYLOR FUND$1,000
YELLOWSTONE FOREVER$1,000
CULTIVATE INITIATIVES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$414k · 20 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
11

Total granted

$414k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+82%

Still filing today

70%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentAnimalsArts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +81%
  • MV
    MADISON VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $72k · revenue +224%
  • MR
    MADISON RIVER FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $56k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCILgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +82%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • YA
    YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jmt Wilderness Conservancy

Working to restore the watersheds, wilderness, and wildlife in the high sierra nevada following the john muir trail (est. 1915) for all life in california.

Environment
2
Teton Regional Land Trust Inc

The mission of the teton regional land trust is to conserve working farms and ranches, fish and wildlife habitat, and scenic open spaces in eastern idaho for this and future generations.

Environment
3
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
4
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
5
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
6
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
9
Bob Marshall Wilderness Foundation

The bob marshall wilderness foundation bmwf has been serving the wilderness recreation community for over twenty 20 years by organizing and leading projects that clear trails and preserve the wilderness ecosystem by restoring damaged areas…

Recreation & Sports
10
Wilderness River Foundation
Youth Development
11
Wilderness Conservation Foundation
Environment
12
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Rangeland Trust; the most unlike its peers is Grand National Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $100,500 · OtherNATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUMReed Schools Foundation: $64,000 · OtherReed Schools FoundationBELVEDERE-HAWTHORNE NURSERY SCHOOLS: $10,000 · OtherLung Cancer Alliance: $9,000 · Other+17 more: $35,526 · Other+17 moreMADISON VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $72,000 · HealthMADISON VALLEY MEDICAL…Stroke Awareness Foundation: $12,500 · HealthStroke Awareness Found…MADISON RIVER FOUNDATION: $56,200 · EnvironmentMADISON RIVER FOU…YELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $9,000 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE FOREV…REDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationGRIZZLY DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $13,500 · AnimalsANNE K TAYLOR FUND: $5,000 · AnimalsBAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $13,500 · Arts & CultureTRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureGRAND NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$219,026Health$84,500Environment$65,200Education$20,100Animals$18,500Arts & Culture$17,000Food & Nutrition$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $100,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMADISON VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $72,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetReed Schools Foundation: $64,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetMADISON RIVER FOUNDATION: $56,200 over 7y, 9.2% of budgetREDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGRIZZLY DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $13,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetStroke Awareness Foundation: $12,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLung Cancer Alliance: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetANNE K TAYLOR FUND: $5,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLIE RUSSELL RIDERS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULTIVATE INITIATIVES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUpper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MADISON VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Reed Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MADISON RIVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRIZZLY DISCOVERY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Stroke Awareness Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds Lung Cancer Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GRAND NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNE K TAYLOR FUND ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds TRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLIE RUSSELL RIDERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS MN MINNESOTANORTH DAKOTASOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CULTIVATE INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds Upper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community Found…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Marin Community FoundationCA12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ed and Yvonne Parish Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ed and Yvonne Parish Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ed and Yvonne Parish Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ed and Yvonne Parish Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ed and Yvonne Parish’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home