Skip to content

Montana · Nonprofit

ANNE K TAYLOR FUND

ANNE K TAYLOR FUND (Montana) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $714,594 to it, the largest being NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ($144,444). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$399k
Funders on record
23
Grants received
$715k
Net assets
$366k
16/23 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 45%
01What it does

What Anne K Taylor Fund does

Mission

To encourage and assist individuals, commuinities and corporations to conserve, protect and restore biodiversity through sound economic activities

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Anne K Taylor Fund (aktf) thanks to generous support from national geographic's big cat initiative, eden wildlife trust, masai mara wildlife conservancies association, mara angama lodge, and many private donors, the aktf boma team constructs and fortifies predator-resistant stockades for maasai herders around the mara. These stockades, called bomas, protect valuable livestock from wild predators like lions, leopards and hyenas. Because losses of livestock mean loss of potential revenue for the maasai, fortified bomas directly reduce the need for herders to protect their assets by hunting and killing predators.the maasai's traditional bomas are made with wooden posts and thorns. These structures deteriorate quickly and are meant to be reconstructed every few years. Now that the maasai are not as nomadic as they used to be, there is a need for sturdier fences that can stand for longer. Aktf constructs chain link bomas wrapped around pressure treated wood posts and steel corner posts. These structures can withstand predator attacks better than traditional bomas, and they are also easier on the environment, as they use less of the mara's scarce wood.since 2014 we have built 170 of…

    $3,286 spent
    1% of program spending
  2. In 1999, aktf's very first projects were anti-poaching patrols and wildlife rescues before the mara conservancy took over management of the mara triangle. The primary responsibilities of the aktf and mara conservancy rangers currently involved in the project include patrolling key poaching hotspots around the reserve, removing snares set by poachers, and helping the kenya wildlife service/david sheldrick wildlife trust veterinarians to rescue animals with human-induced injuries. The team also collaborates with national geographic big cats initiative, eden wildlife trust, mara north conservancy, mara conservancy, oloisukut conservancy, mara elephant project, wwf, kenya forestry service - as well as many local community members - to fulfill its mission. Our work to save kenya's wildlife for future generations could not be possible without the help of these organizations, and we are extremely grateful for their collaboration.elias kamande leads, manages, and transports the anti-poaching team. The other permanent members of the aktf anti-poaching team are ole kilonga, ole saitoti, ole sirere, and oloito kinanda, all of whom are local maasai community members. We are grateful to mara…

    $206,690 spent$16,591 earned by the program
    76% of program spending
  3. Empowering local children is the key to a healthy future for maasai mara. However, most of the schools in the area are underfunded and lack even proper facilities for holding classes. As part of our mission, aktf engages in building facilities, training teachers and promoting hygiene at local schools. At oliashire primary school, aktf built a kitchen and helped parents to initiate a feeding programme. Feeding students at school is critical to their academic success because most of them walk miles and miles to school each morning with only a cup of tea in their stomachs. Nutritious meals at school not only encourage attendance, but they also help energize students to pay attention and soak up their lessons. At oliashire and oloolmongi, we completed eight new pit latrines for the students in each school. These private, clean facilities will help improve the health of the student body by reducing disease transmission in the environment.at nailepu junior academy, upon completion of new classrooms, we were proud to join nailepu families, teachers, and administrators in honoring larry and susan patrick, the generous donors who have made the construction of nailepu possible. We also…

    $60,507 spent
    22% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $270,483.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($322k) Expenses 100 ($189k) Net assets 100 ($203k)2018 Revenue 55 ($176k) Expenses 124 ($234k) Net assets 71 ($145k)2019 Revenue 71 ($227k) Expenses 129 ($244k) Net assets 63 ($128k)2020 Revenue 63 ($202k) Expenses 86 ($162k) Net assets 83 ($167k)2021 Revenue 57 ($182k) Expenses 148 ($279k) Net assets 35 ($70k)2022 Revenue 61 ($195k) Expenses 101 ($191k) Net assets 40 ($82k)2023 Revenue 90 ($290k) Expenses 102 ($194k) Net assets 119 ($241k)2024 Revenue 124 ($399k) Expenses 145 ($275k) Net assets 180 ($366k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (124)Expenses (145)Net assets (180)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $82k to $241k (+195%).

$203k
$145k
$128k
$167k
$70k
$82k
$241k
$366k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

95% of ANNE K TAYLOR FUND’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,065 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$132k
’17
−$58k
’18
−$17k
’19
$39k
’20
−$97k
’21
$4k
’22
$97k
’23
$125k
’24
13
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

201720182019202020232024
Listed555555
Joined·+0+0+0·+0
No longer listed·000·0
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 8 funders to 12 funders, grant income rose $83k → $129k.

4 of 23 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 26% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ANNE K TAYLOR FUND’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ANNE K TAYLOR FUND has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

46% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ANNE K TAYLOR FUND.

20%
largest funder
50%
top three
~9
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 89% · 2018 44% · 2019 78% · 2020 35% · 2021 38% · 2022 33% · 2023 19% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

69% of ANNE K TAYLOR FUND's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 70% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

ANNE K TAYLOR FUND draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Montana, across 13 states in all.

IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
VA
DE
NC
DC
HI
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Montana out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $186k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ANNE K TAYLOR FUND runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 6,443 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin31% · top quartile
Months of reserve13.2mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,443 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like ANNE K TAYLOR FUND

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Montana

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 2%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

61%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ANNE K TAYLOR FUND: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ANNE K TAYLOR FUND?
ANNE K TAYLOR FUND (Montana) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $714,594 to it, the largest being NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ($144,444). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ANNE K TAYLOR FUND have?
IRS filings report 23 organizations giving $714,594 in grants to ANNE K TAYLOR FUND, 16 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ANNE K TAYLOR FUND?
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY is the largest funder on record, with $144,444 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ANNE K TAYLOR FUND find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Montana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Anne K Taylor →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 23 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing