· Private foundation
The Crevier Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $59k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $199k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAL STATE FULLERTON PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDA | $50,000 |
| CAMP TAMARACKON BELAY TY | $15,000 |
| Valkyrie Gives | $15,000 |
| Sea Shepherd Conservation Society | $15,000 |
| KIDS Center | $15,000 |
| Bunny's Buddies | $15,000 |
| CASA | $15,000 |
| GUARDIAN GROUP | $15,000 |
| PeaceWorks Inc | $14,000 |
| Minds Matter Colorado | $10,000 |
| Let Grace In | $10,000 |
| Someone Cares | $10,000 |
| Friendship Shelter | $10,000 |
| Associations of Fundraising Professional | $10,000 |
| Heart of Oregon Corps | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $172k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
49 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $131k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FSFRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +215%
- SSSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY5× · 2021–2025 · $80k · revenue +37%
KIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER5× · 2021–2025 · $80k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- EFEducational Foundationone grant, 2024 · $20k
- BGBoys & Girls Aid Societyone grant, 2022 · $15k
- AJARRUPE JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.
The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…
Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Friends - portland commits to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to their success. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League and the most unlike its peers is National Geographic Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds KIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEART OF OREGON CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds MARLEY'S MUTTS DOG RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds CONCERN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CAL STATE FULLERTON PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINDS MATTER COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON ↗
- Who funds GUARDIAN GROUP ↗
- Who funds VALKYRIE GIVES ↗
- Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
- Who funds ORKEESWA INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds MAX S LOVE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Doggie Bonez Inc ↗
- Who funds KOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DBA ROOTEDHOMES ↗
- Who funds FAMILY KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds DENVER TENNIS PARK ↗
- Who funds YOUTHPOWER365 ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Anjulicia Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · St Charles Health System Inc · The Ford Family Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · United Way of Deschutes County · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Denver Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Crevier Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- J Bar J Youth Services Inc — 71% of income from government
- Kor Community Land Trust Dba Rootedhomes — 63% of income from government
- Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery — 60% of income from government
- High Desert Food & Farm Alliance — 45% of income from government
- Central Oregon Veterans Ranch — 45% of income from government
- Heart of Oregon Corps Inc — 28% of income from government
- Mosaic Community Health — 8% of income from government
- Think Wild — 7% of income from government
- Casa of Central Oregon — 2% of income from government
- Central Oregon Environmental Center Inc Dba - the Environmental Center — 0% of income from government
- First Story — 0% of income from government
- Choice Adoptions — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Crevier Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Crevier Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.