Skip to content
The Countess Moira Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Countess Moira Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$3.3MArts & Culture$2.3MPhilanthropy$1.3MInternational$1.3MHealth$1.3MYouth Development$1.0MFood & Nutrition$1.0MRecreation & Sports$525kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$37M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAST END HOSPICE INC$250,000
RETREAT INC$250,000
FAMILY CENTER INC$200,000
914 CARES INC$196,625
DELIVERING GOOD INC$150,000
NEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE$150,000
NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY$125,000
CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT$100,000
FIVER CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC$100,000
COMMUNITY-WORD PROJECT INC$90,000
WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC$76,600
CRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL$70,000
UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND$65,000
COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC$50,000
INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $5.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EAST END HOSPICE INC: $500k → 7%ASTOR SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $55k → 9%DELIVERING GOOD: $200k → 17%FAMILY CENTER INC: $200k → 20%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $250k → 14%EAST END HOSPICE INC: $250k → 7%ASTOR SERVICES FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $55k → 9%DELIVERING GOOD INC: $200k → 17%FAMILY CENTER INC: $125k → 20%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $250k → 14%EAST END HOSPICE INC: $250k → 7%ASTOR SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $55k → 9%DELIVERING GOOD: $200k → 17%FAMILY CENTER INC: $50k → 20%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $250k → 14%EAST END HOSPICE INC: $100k → 7%ASTOR SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $55k → 9%DELIVERING GOOD INC: $200k → 17%FAMILY CENTER INC: $50k → 20%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $250k → 14%EAST END HOSPICE: $75k → 7%DELIVERING GOOD INC: $150k → 17%FAMILY CENTER INC: $50k → 20%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $200k → 14%RETREAT INC: $250k → 7%DELIVERING GOOD INC: $150k → 17%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $50k → 20%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $100k → 14%RETREAT INC: $250k → 7%DELIVERING GOOD INC: $150k → 17%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $50k → 20%THE RETREAT: $100k → 7%RETREAT INC: $50k → 7%RETREAT INC: $10k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $100k → 7%YMCA OF GREATER NEW YORK: $250k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 27 repeat orgs$820k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
15

Total granted

$12M
$820k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+7%

Still filing today

93%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT
    6× · 2019–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +0%
  • EE
    East End Hospice Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +15%
  • NY
    NEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $900k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +42%
  • LI
    Long Island Cares Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +7%
  • E
    ENACT
    one grant, 2019 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
3
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
4
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
5
The Child Study Center of New York

To provide a program for children with special needs, ages three to five years by utilizing the disciplines of psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy as integral functions of the educational program.

—
6
Girls Incorporated of New York City

The mission of girls inc. of new york city is to advocate for and improve the lives of underserved girls and youth, ages 6 to 21+, in the five boroughs. we pursue this mission by providing research-based educational programs in the areas…

Civil Rights
7
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
8
Alternatives for Children

To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.

—
9
Partnership With Children Inc

Partnership with children's mission is to strengthen the emotional, social, and cognitive skills of children in new york city so they can succeed in school, society, and life.

—
10
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
11
Correctional Association of New York

Cany provides independent oversight of prisons in new york to promote transparency and accountability; safeguard the human and civil rights of incarcerated people; identify and provoke a response to harmful practices and policies;…

—
12
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Side House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp Exclamation Point Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
21/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $1,300,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICTDELIVERING GOOD INC: $1,250,000 · Human ServicesDELIVERING GOOD INCEast End Hospice Inc: $1,175,000 · Human ServicesEast End Hospice IncRetreat Inc: $660,000 · Human ServicesRetreat IncTHE FAMILY CENTER INC: $475,000 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY CENTER INCYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK: $250,000 · Human ServicesASTOR SERVICES FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $220,000 · Human Services+2 more: $200,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND: $605,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAN…ASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC: $464,600 · OtherASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUA…CRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL: $408,000 · OtherCRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH…GEMS: $125,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY-WORD PROJECT INC: $585,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY-WORD PROJECT I…ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $200,000 · OtherISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANI…+13 more: $505,260 · Other+13 moreNEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE: $900,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK HALL…Storytelling Arts Inc: $370,500 · Arts & CultureStorytelling …WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $314,240 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MO…+2 more: $37,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $825,000 · Food & NutritionFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $625,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ELM PROJECT: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentFARMS FOR CITY KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Youth Development(914) CARES INC: $644,960 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $70,000 · PhilanthropyCOUNTY HARVEST INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyEAST SIDE HOUSE INC: $350,000 · Recreation & SportsINTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED: $250,000 · Recreation & SportsWomens Sports Foundation: $100,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$5,530,000Other$2,892,860Arts & Culture$1,621,740Food & Nutrition$825,000Youth Development$825,000Philanthropy$739,960Recreation & Sports$700,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $1,300,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetDELIVERING GOOD INC: $1,250,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEast End Hospice Inc: $1,175,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetNEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE: $900,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $825,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetRetreat Inc: $660,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budget(914) CARES INC: $644,960 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $625,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND: $605,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY-WORD PROJECT INC: $585,000 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetTHE FAMILY CENTER INC: $475,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC: $464,600 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL: $408,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetStorytelling Arts Inc: $370,500 over 5y, 56% of budgetEAST SIDE HOUSE INC: $350,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $314,240 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED: $250,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASTOR SERVICES FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $220,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $200,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ELM PROJECT: $150,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWomens Sports Foundation: $100,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFARMS FOR CITY KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNEW YORK JUNIOR TENNIS LEAGUE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCAMP EXCLAMATION POINT INC: $50,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetCOUNTY HARVEST INC: $25,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Long Island Center for Arts & Sciences Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 75% of budgetFRIENDS OF MILLS MANSION: $7,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express Foun…The New York Communit…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Mother Cabrini Health…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Hyde and Watson F…National Philanthropi…Td Charitable Foundat…Jewish Communal FundMorgan Stanley Global…Charities Aid Foundat…The Pfizer Foundation…
American Express FoundationNY15.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Td Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Countess Moira Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Countess Moira Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Camp Exclamation Point Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Countess Moira’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home